Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Ansky (High Stakes)

2 Months, 2 Million: Ansky: Episode Four

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

2 Months, 2 Million: Ansky: Episode Four by Ansky

Ansky four tables $5/10 NL and discusses his hands and situations as they occur.

About 2 Months, 2 Million Subscribe to

Two months. Two million. No problem. That's Team Israel's goal for the summer in Vegas. Watch Jay help hit it. This ongoing series is an in-depth look at his life during the shooting of whitelime, flawless_victory, Ansky and KRANTZ's forthcoming reality TV show (filming in Vegas this summer and airing on G4 in late August). Jay will play and analyze hands he's actually playing while on television, using an aggressive bankroll management strategy to climb from 5/10 and 10/20 back to the nosebleeds. Can he make it? We have faith. They don't call him pr1nnyraid for nothin'.

Tags

two months two million 2M2MM ansky high stakes nl nl holdem $5/10 nl

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 45 minutes long
  • Posted about 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for 2 Months, 2 Million: Ansky: Episode Four

basti

Avatar for basti

1 posts
Joined 04/2008

love to see Anskys videos! big point for DC

Posted over 2 years ago

freakstar

Avatar for freakstar

212 posts
Joined 05/2008

plz dont stop your random rambling about other things than the actual hands, I really really love it. Great vid.

Posted over 2 years ago

Heroin Bob

Avatar for Heroin Bob

18 posts
Joined 09/2008

oneillsurfer03

Avatar for oneillsurfer03

1397 posts
Joined 07/2008

Anksy-

I have a general theory question. The hand where u have JJ on the AQT board u check back which is very standard with sd value in a spot u cant get value. MY question is what if u had a hand like K9s or 77 that technicalyy has some SD vaue but is going to be very hard to get to sd profitably. When i learned about SD value i started to always check back SD value but lately have been checking back when im at the top of my SD value range and betting when im at the bottom of my SD value range bc of bc i get hands w/ equity to fold and some times get ppl off better hands.
When What are spots that u decide to bet w/ sd value and times u decide to check back.

Alot of times you cant get worse hands to fold but also hands w/ equity folding is good for u too. A spot that comes to mind is c betting KQ on A72. I realize u never get called by worse but its a board u are going to pick up the pot most the time and protecting ur equity in the pot. I think often matc flow and history can make these spots go either way but of ten i find myself torn. Any advice would be great.

Posted over 2 years ago

Ansky

Avatar for Ansky

Exec Producer
265 posts
Joined 08/2009

Anksy-

I have a general theory question. The hand where u have JJ on the AQT board u check back which is very standard with sd value in a spot u cant get value. MY question is what if u had a hand like K9s or 77 that technicalyy has some SD vaue but is going to be very hard to get to sd profitably. When i learned about SD value i started to always check back SD value but lately have been checking back when im at the top of my SD value range and betting when im at the bottom of my SD value range bc of bc i get hands w/ equity to fold and some times get ppl off better hands.
When What are spots that u decide to bet w/ sd value and times u decide to check back.

Alot of times you cant get worse hands to fold but also hands w/ equity folding is good for u too. A spot that comes to mind is c betting KQ on A72. I realize u never get called by worse but its a board u are going to pick up the pot most the time and protecting ur equity in the pot. I think often matc flow and history can make these spots go either way but of ten i find myself torn. Any advice would be great.



I agree that there is a lot to be said for the vulnerability of your hand in determining whether or not to bet w/ showdown value. You shouldn't consider strictly the immediate showdown value on the flop, but rather the likelihood of your hand still being best by the river. To illustrate this point, I'd say you should be far more likely to cbet a hand like 22 on TT5, than a hand like AK. 22 may be the "stronger" hand at the time, but it actually has less SD value, due to how easily you can get counterfitted.

Posted over 2 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

Founder
6970 posts
Joined 11/2006

Anksy-

I have a general theory question. The hand where u have JJ on the AQT board u check back which is very standard with sd value in a spot u cant get value. .



Please leave a time-stamp or better yet, Watch this short video, and leave a time link!

That will be much easier for the coaches to find the hand and answer your questions, thanks.

Posted over 2 years ago

oneillsurfer03

Avatar for oneillsurfer03

1397 posts
Joined 07/2008

Please leave a time-stamp or better yet, Watch this short video, and leave a time link!

That will be much easier for the coaches to find the hand and answer your questions, thanks.


my question was more about general spots and that was just a broad example so i didnt think it was necessary for this but in the future NP.

Posted over 2 years ago

halvadron

Avatar for halvadron

255 posts
Joined 06/2009

good video...


wait. did i said good? awesome! don`t ***king change the format or anything pls Smile

Posted over 2 years ago

HiT0Mi

Avatar for HiT0Mi

85 posts
Joined 09/2009

good sweat video. You should have a discussion about 3 betting with DJ Sensei at some point, would be quite interesting!

Posted over 2 years ago

Tonto

Avatar for Tonto

101 posts
Joined 04/2008

Great vid.

Your tangents are actually of great value because, although specific hands are good, your theoretical 'tangent-talk' does, in effect, help with more specific hand situations; It's really what its all about.

Fantastic stuff.

REALLY looking forward to your hu content

Posted over 2 years ago

MArkusG

Avatar for MArkusG

2 posts
Joined 09/2009

Why arenæt u sitting 2k deep on the one on the top right, when there is a massive fish to youre lefT?

Posted over 2 years ago

benny1978

Avatar for benny1978

32 posts
Joined 08/2009

Dani,

Great vid as always, love your passion for coaching.....wp to Krant who has signed the equivelent to Messi / Ronaldo of poker coaching.

When you talk about double barraling with draws 150bb+ deep what would you say is good barraling cards 100bb deep? top pairs for example rather than draws?

Benny

Posted over 2 years ago

Choparno

Avatar for Choparno

66 posts
Joined 08/2008

Time Link to 00:12:57

Do you put any value on bet sizing tells vs certain passive fish? In the QJ hand on top right, when they pot flop and either pot or shove turn, or min raise flop / pot turn when you are the preflop raiser, I find it to be a highly reliable read that they have TPTK or better every time.

Difficult to quantify I guess, and harder if you literally have no reads, but just wondering how much value you give to bet sizing tells vs random fish who sit with 50bbs.

Posted over 2 years ago

Choparno

Avatar for Choparno

66 posts
Joined 08/2008

Excellent videos so far btw, first-rate content. Tangents are fine, just go with the flow.

Posted over 2 years ago

mocky

Avatar for mocky

49 posts
Joined 11/2008

J_Camp

Avatar for J_Camp

4 posts
Joined 12/2008

Time Link to 00:28:34

Dani,

Another home run! I do have one question about the bet sizing on the Turn with this set of Tens hand. Now I know you go on about how you could check behind on this turn but assuming you do choose to bet, why do you bet $200 into $700 with effective stacks of 1200? I would be more inclined to bet like 1/2 pot $350 into $700. With your line when called the pot goes to $1100 and stacks to $1000 which sets up a pot sized river bet. If you went $350 then on the river the pot is $1400 and only $850 behind. I think your much more likely to be called for the last barrel in that situation. Do you really think people call or raise more frequently for $200 than $350 on the turn? Your bet actually looks more suspicious to me like your trying to induce action. Maybe even $500 is better since the board is a little wet with the straight possibilities and flush draws. Does it bother you that your giving odds to a flush draw? Please let me know your thought process here on the bet sizing you chose.

Thanks,

JCampbell

Posted over 2 years ago

surfdoc

Avatar for surfdoc

Coach
170 posts
Joined 02/2007

Very nice work. I really like the tangents and the discussion about multiway pots and manipulating situations around a fish was top notch.

Posted over 2 years ago

SpidsDK

Avatar for SpidsDK

1 posts
Joined 08/2008

hey...good vid, but what are the layout mod you are using on ftP?

Posted about 2 years ago

dangerfish

Avatar for dangerfish

39 posts
Joined 02/2007

That was solid. I encourage you to offer up as much of your own style as possible. Well done.

Posted about 2 years ago

ssslipnssslide

Avatar for ssslipnssslide

12 posts
Joined 04/2010

Dani,

Question on the T9o hand when you are cold 4 bet from the sb he makes it really small offering you 3:1 on a call. Is this never a situation where you call and see a flop? Would this change if you had T9s? At what point with your non-value 3 betting hands such as this one are you calling such a small 4bet with...i assume maybe QJs+ any thoughts on this?

fyi there would be about 3x pot effective stacks if you had made the call would put the pot at 600 and he had 1800 behind.

Thanks

Posted almost 2 years ago



HomePoker Videos → 2 Months, 2 Million → Ansky: Episode Four