love to see Anskys videos! big point for DC
Ansky four tables $5/10 NL and discusses his hands and situations as they occur.
Two months. Two million. No problem. That's Team Israel's goal for the summer in Vegas. Watch Jay help hit it. This ongoing series is an in-depth look at his life during the shooting of whitelime, flawless_victory, Ansky and KRANTZ's forthcoming reality TV show (filming in Vegas this summer and airing on G4 in late August). Jay will play and analyze hands he's actually playing while on television, using an aggressive bankroll management strategy to climb from 5/10 and 10/20 back to the nosebleeds. Can he make it? We have faith. They don't call him pr1nnyraid for nothin'.
Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.
love to see Anskys videos! big point for DC
plz dont stop your random rambling about other things than the actual hands, I really really love it. Great vid.
WTB Ansky HU vids!
Anksy-
I have a general theory question. The hand where u have JJ on the AQT board u check back which is very standard with sd value in a spot u cant get value. MY question is what if u had a hand like K9s or 77 that technicalyy has some SD vaue but is going to be very hard to get to sd profitably. When i learned about SD value i started to always check back SD value but lately have been checking back when im at the top of my SD value range and betting when im at the bottom of my SD value range bc of bc i get hands w/ equity to fold and some times get ppl off better hands.
When What are spots that u decide to bet w/ sd value and times u decide to check back.
Alot of times you cant get worse hands to fold but also hands w/ equity folding is good for u too. A spot that comes to mind is c betting KQ on A72. I realize u never get called by worse but its a board u are going to pick up the pot most the time and protecting ur equity in the pot. I think often matc flow and history can make these spots go either way but of ten i find myself torn. Any advice would be great.
Anksy-
I have a general theory question. The hand where u have JJ on the AQT board u check back which is very standard with sd value in a spot u cant get value. MY question is what if u had a hand like K9s or 77 that technicalyy has some SD vaue but is going to be very hard to get to sd profitably. When i learned about SD value i started to always check back SD value but lately have been checking back when im at the top of my SD value range and betting when im at the bottom of my SD value range bc of bc i get hands w/ equity to fold and some times get ppl off better hands.
When What are spots that u decide to bet w/ sd value and times u decide to check back.
Alot of times you cant get worse hands to fold but also hands w/ equity folding is good for u too. A spot that comes to mind is c betting KQ on A72. I realize u never get called by worse but its a board u are going to pick up the pot most the time and protecting ur equity in the pot. I think often matc flow and history can make these spots go either way but of ten i find myself torn. Any advice would be great.
I agree that there is a lot to be said for the vulnerability of your hand in determining whether or not to bet w/ showdown value. You shouldn't consider strictly the immediate showdown value on the flop, but rather the likelihood of your hand still being best by the river. To illustrate this point, I'd say you should be far more likely to cbet a hand like 22 on TT5, than a hand like AK. 22 may be the "stronger" hand at the time, but it actually has less SD value, due to how easily you can get counterfitted.
Anksy-
I have a general theory question. The hand where u have JJ on the AQT board u check back which is very standard with sd value in a spot u cant get value. .
Please leave a time-stamp or better yet, Watch this short video, and leave a time link!
That will be much easier for the coaches to find the hand and answer your questions, thanks.
Please leave a time-stamp or better yet, Watch this short video, and leave a time link!
That will be much easier for the coaches to find the hand and answer your questions, thanks.
my question was more about general spots and that was just a broad example so i didnt think it was necessary for this but in the future NP.
good video...
wait. did i said good? awesome! don`t ***king change the format or anything pls ![]()
good sweat video. You should have a discussion about 3 betting with DJ Sensei at some point, would be quite interesting!
Great vid.
Your tangents are actually of great value because, although specific hands are good, your theoretical 'tangent-talk' does, in effect, help with more specific hand situations; It's really what its all about.
Fantastic stuff.
REALLY looking forward to your hu content
Why arenæt u sitting 2k deep on the one on the top right, when there is a massive fish to youre lefT?
Dani,
Great vid as always, love your passion for coaching.....wp to Krant who has signed the equivelent to Messi / Ronaldo of poker coaching.
When you talk about double barraling with draws 150bb+ deep what would you say is good barraling cards 100bb deep? top pairs for example rather than draws?
Benny
Time Link to 00:12:57
Do you put any value on bet sizing tells vs certain passive fish? In the QJ hand on top right, when they pot flop and either pot or shove turn, or min raise flop / pot turn when you are the preflop raiser, I find it to be a highly reliable read that they have TPTK or better every time.
Difficult to quantify I guess, and harder if you literally have no reads, but just wondering how much value you give to bet sizing tells vs random fish who sit with 50bbs.
Excellent videos so far btw, first-rate content. Tangents are fine, just go with the flow.
tangents ftw! more of the same plz
Time Link to 00:28:34
Dani,
Another home run! I do have one question about the bet sizing on the Turn with this set of Tens hand. Now I know you go on about how you could check behind on this turn but assuming you do choose to bet, why do you bet $200 into $700 with effective stacks of 1200? I would be more inclined to bet like 1/2 pot $350 into $700. With your line when called the pot goes to $1100 and stacks to $1000 which sets up a pot sized river bet. If you went $350 then on the river the pot is $1400 and only $850 behind. I think your much more likely to be called for the last barrel in that situation. Do you really think people call or raise more frequently for $200 than $350 on the turn? Your bet actually looks more suspicious to me like your trying to induce action. Maybe even $500 is better since the board is a little wet with the straight possibilities and flush draws. Does it bother you that your giving odds to a flush draw? Please let me know your thought process here on the bet sizing you chose.
Thanks,
JCampbell
Very nice work. I really like the tangents and the discussion about multiway pots and manipulating situations around a fish was top notch.
hey...good vid, but what are the layout mod you are using on ftP?
That was solid. I encourage you to offer up as much of your own style as possible. Well done.
Dani,
Question on the T9o hand when you are cold 4 bet from the sb he makes it really small offering you 3:1 on a call. Is this never a situation where you call and see a flop? Would this change if you had T9s? At what point with your non-value 3 betting hands such as this one are you calling such a small 4bet with...i assume maybe QJs+ any thoughts on this?
fyi there would be about 3x pot effective stacks if you had made the call would put the pot at 600 and he had 1800 behind.
Thanks
Home → Poker Videos → 2 Months, 2 Million → Ansky: Episode Four