September 13, 2011
The mental game of poker
Lately there has been a lot going on and I like the way everything is developing around me.
At the moment I am playing 20nl, both because of goals I have been setting about my learning process but also bankroll management. Things have been going rough since I am playing Ipoker. Downswinging and playing bad + tilt. Had a pretty big roll for 50nl, but now I am at the point where I don't feel comfortable anymore playing that level, so I decided to play 20nl. Not to gain back confidence, just because of brm and goal settings.
One of my biggest changes is that I am playing without a HUD. I made my decisions based on stats, and not on gameflow and dynamics. The hud is doing more harm then good in my game, so I decided to ditch it. I might bring it back in the future, but so far I like what it's doing to my game. If I bring it back, it will probably only have VPIP/PFR in there. It's the only 2 stats I really miss so far. I have trouble recognizning if the regular is a nit, a tag or a lag. I do think this might be an observing skill that gets better over time.
Getting forced to think deeper about situations is great for my game which has slipped into a weird form of auto-piloting. Check raising from the blinds because somebody has a high c-bet %, or calling a 3-bet because of stats... it has all come to the consious incompetence level (for the Jared Tendler freaks among us).
I think I played with a system while thinking I was not. Not sure how I got into that, but at this point its not really important. More important is to see how everything has developed in my game so far, and why I have been a break even/slightly winner at low stakes for a relative long time (compared too other players on DC who sky rocket the stakes while I joined earlier then them). I have to do this for myself, and I want to be open about it.
I was eager to learn and I was eager to get better. I wanted to be the best regular at my stakes and I worked really hard on my game. The way I was learning was by adding new knowledge. I learned more and more about the game, and never really worked on 1 particulair part of my game. If i decided to focus on 1 part, it would be for a week and I would go to the next thing to focus on (adhd). After reading 'the mental game of poker', I can tell you I am a typical example of somebody that plays really well when I am on my a-game (where things are on consious competence level), but plays really bad when I am on my B-game or C-game (unconsious competence). I am not solid, I have not build a solid foundation.
I have some parts in my poker house where it's solid, but there a lot of parts in my poker house where it is shaky.
I kept adding stuff to my poker knowledge, which all ends up in consious competence. Which means that I needed to be completely focussed and full of energy to play well to be able to think about all those things I was adding to the CC level. Once I was not on my a-game anymore (this could be for 20 minutes, days, or weeks), I would fall back into my b-game or c-game, and since my game was not solid on the Onconsious Competence level and since it's really hard to be on your a-game all the time it makes sense that I never have been a big winning player. Add that to my ADHD which made it really hard to concentrate well, and other side-effects + my tilt issues... Its a wonder I am still alive as a poker player. I have been running really well, so in a way, this 'downswing' is the best thing that happened to my game. I had to face facts.
Tilt always has been an issue, and the way I tilt is because of mistakes I make. If I make a mistake, I tilt. Especially if it's an mistake I think I should not be making because I know its stupid. I would tilt, and make 10 more. What I never really understood till now, was that the fact I make the mistake means that its not in my unconsious competence level. Its still on consious level, so its not integrated in my game yet. A mistake is a sign of a part of my game that is not solid yet. I never gave myself the change of learning from my mistakes because I would keep tilting about it. Never looked at mistakes with a clear view, but always fully loaded with emotion.
If I made a "terrible mistake" and started tilting after that, I always ended up being down on myself, asking myself things like "how can I be so fucking stupid" or "If I keep making mistakes like this I will never become a winning player". After the fire of aggression I would end up feeling terrible, then It would turn into inspiration by talking myself out of the 'feeling terrible'. Then I would come to DC to start a poker video to learn more poker, because the inspiration made me eager to get better. So more was added to the consious competence and incompetence level, and I never gave myself a shot to really correct the flaws in my game. Atleast way way slower then possible.
Because of all the learning, and because I worked so hard on my game, every time I had a (big) winning session it would feel normal (i am learning hard so I should be winning), and every time I was losing because of those obv. mistakes, it felt completely gross. I could not believe I was making that mistake again, I could not believe I was still not a better player etc.
I also felt like variance was not fair to me, guys like illbetyoudie who moved up in stakes like it was nothing while I was working so hard felt like such an unfair thing. I was entilteld to win. I earned it. I worked so hard on poker, and I was still this break even player while others where playing way higher that were not even that much better then me.
Most regulars at my stakes sucked, I could never admit i got out played and I was the best at my tables. Guys that move up in stakes deal with good variance, but besides that, they do things very well that I am not doing. They also deal with bad variance, just like me. There is also no way in telling how hard somebody is working, and I just wanted to believe I worked harder or atleast as hard. They might also already have known how to use DC and how to learn poker the right way. I just didnt want to face the reality of me not being the player I think I was.
I was over condifent. I needed a reality check which would show me that I am not as good as I think I am when I am winning, and not as terrible as I think I am when losing. I got that reality check this summer.
I am still eager to learn, but I want to do it the right way. I want to pay my dues. I have some great people on skype and have some great discussions with them. My dreams in poker have made place for goals. Goals that can be achieved, and goals I can work on right away.
My mental game was my weak link in poker and it prevented me from achieving my potential.
I highly suggest to buy Jared Tendler - The mental game of poker. It might be that one thing you really need.

5 Comments:
PaulWIlson posted on September 13, 2011 at 20:07 PM
I read your post and thought that it could have been me writing this. Especially the parts about not moving up in stakes for ages and learning everything while nothing seems to get to the unconscious competence level.
I got "The mental game of poker" last Tuesday and I´m reading it since then. Allthough I brought it to fix some motivational issues I think there may also be some fear/confidence problems (and some little tilt issues^^).
Good luck!
SnappieVouz posted on September 13, 2011 at 20:16 PM
Thank u for your respond. Confidence has def. been an issue for me. Fear, idk, maybe I am a bit in denial about that :)
Acombfosho posted on September 13, 2011 at 21:44 PM
hey snap, writing just before i head to SK... id like to say man, wow, great blog post, i see some stuff in there too i relate to. i think that the ealry part of the book talks about the 'range' of your skills. We spend so much time learning new skills, new skills, new skills, without getting ONE skill down to the UC (unconscious competence) level that our 'range' of play from A-game to C-game is really wide, and when we look back at it we are like, wtf i cant believe how stupid i played because logically I know this. What this is telling us that we havent got our learned skills to the point of UC, we are still able to make those skills play when we are in A-game (aka Conscious Competence), but when we tilt all that goes out of the window, so the spread in our range from UC to CC to CI to UI is MASSIVE. SO in essence I think you are tottally right for going back to basics and focusing on ONE THING, until it is totally UC level.
Interestingly, there is a coach called TRD23 who spoke about this a lot, focusing on ONE LEARNING skill at a time. I found out about this in 2009 but never really applied it properly, so he was definately on to something HUGE. I made a blog post about it http://www.deucescracked.com/blogs/acombfosho/707-My-current-learning-focus-quitting-well and I still struggle with it! Shows how far the 'range spread' can get between UC CC CI and UI..
Good luck and speak to u as soon as im set up over in SK
SnappieVouz posted on September 14, 2011 at 05:30 AM
I can't agree more. Its also learning the wrong things for your stakes, while not having build that foundation.
Everything is build on that solid foundation. So if the foundation is shaky, your never going to make a house that will last a big storm
And if there is a lot of storm, your very lucky to still have a bit of a standing house.
Miserry posted on October 01, 2011 at 22:56 PM
Great post m8.
I feel that's exactly my story in poker and im so happy to write this.
I just want to thank you for this post :)
I am gonna buy this book ASAP and mby i will thank you again.
I'm working on my B/C game in past simple and i feel better than crap (like it was a last few months).
Log in or sign up to leave a comment!