November 15, 2009

Breaking it down

My poker career has sort of reached a standstill recently, mostly because of the low amounts of volume that I put in, but also because I’m having trouble finding sure footing in terms. I decided to break down a bunch of different poker games I play or could play.

NLHE MTTs

Pros:
- I have a lot of MTT experience and have developed a pretty solid strategy over the years.
- MTTs are easiest to multi-table
- A lot of tournaments are soft where players play straightforwardly and weak.
- Most of my best results are from tournaments, by far

Cons:
- High variance and relies on big scores to maintain a good profit
- Takes up a lot of time and commitment, which creates a motivation issue
- Hard to move up

NLHE 6-max cash

Pros:
- Quite experienced at NL with plenty of material to improve with
- Plenty of games

Cons:
- Games are relatively tough: too much material out there to learn NL and players are fairly aggressive/good hand readers
- Gets really tough once you move up
- Can be boring

PLO cash

Pros:
- Plenty of good games filled with weak players

Cons:
- High variance, can be frustrating
- Still learning the ins and outs of the game

Triple-draw

Pros:
- Very strong 2-7 game
- A lot of bad players

Cons:
- Only a few games going at once, if any
- Very swingy (especially when I take shots at 15/30 or play heads up)

Mixed games (7-game, 8-game)

Pros:
- Very weak tables where people play like at least two stake levels lower
- I’m a good all-rounder and can play all the games pretty well, especially relative to the field

Cons:
- Multiple games make it tougher to multi-table, especially with the stud games
- Sometimes only a couple games running at a time
- Unbalance of the games can be quite frustrating (PLO plays too big)

HU NL cash

Pros:
- High winrates in HU
- Can bumhunt pretty easily

Cons:
- High variance
- Need to become proficient at HU
- The nature of HU is too personal for me

There you have it: my entire range of options. The problem right now is I keep mixing them all and I think I should have a clear idea of what my primary game is and then concentrate on it instead of playing a billion different things at once.

Having listed everything in such a fashion, it seems like tournament poker is the best way to go for now, but I really need to sit down and commit myself to some full days. Having said that, I have a really busy week next week so I probably won’t get into the full swing of things for a while.

Posted By Schweig at 10:07 PM

2 Comments

2 Comments:

OnTheCome posted on November 17, 2009 at 05:17 AM

Trip

You did a good job of breaking down each game. What game do you think you have the biggest edge in? and which game do you enjoy playing most?


Schweig posted on November 17, 2009 at 05:34 AM

Qztbp

I think my biggest edge is probably in the 8-game/7-game mix. I play $4/$8 regularly and the players definitely play very poorly compared to the equivalent stakes in each game. For example, the 1/2 NL portion plays nowhere near as aggressive or as good as regular 200NL and probably doesn't play much differently from 50NL.

Within the mix though, I think a lot of my edge comes from the PLO because it plays so huge (4/8 stud is not anywhere near equivalent to 200PLO, probably closer to 100PLO) and I think a lot of people make huge mistakes for their stacks. Generally though, I think I have a decent edge in most of the games, just because the player field is weak.

The game I enjoy the most is Triple draw. I think the game strikes a good balance to being a good mathematical game, but at the same time providing many interesting situations to analyse, with room to make moves or mix up your play.


 

Log in or to leave a comment!

About Me

Qztbp

Schweig

Archive