Micro/Small Stakes, 2 tables, 52 minutes.
Joe brings two tables Stud Hi and Stud Hi/Low on BoDog, starting short handed and plays some HU before he ends up in great full ring games.
Micro/Small Stakes, 2 tables, 58 minutes.
Dj Sensei and Andrew pickup where they left off with the last video review session and get right into the action.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 49 minutes.
Terp show hand examples from the theoretical topic of linking two decisions together without treating them as separate decisions.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 52 minutes.
Bellatrix is talking about tournaments and the correlation or lack of correlation between cash payouts and chip values. Homework for the week can be found <a href="http://d2jl7hdveqsyxg.cloudfront.net/Math%20Attacks/homework27.pdf">here.</a>
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 43 minutes.
Terp talks about villian's that play unbalanced and the common responses we make, using hand histories to illustrate his points.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 12 minutes.
For the next theory installment Terp talks about situations where we say "My opponent does X too often so....".
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 52 minutes.
Bellatrix moves from cash games to tournament theory with a chapter on All-In and coin-flips. Homework for this week can be found <a href="http://d2jl7hdveqsyxg.cloudfront.net/Math%20Attacks/homework26.pdf">here.</a>
Micro/Small Stakes, 2 tables, 40 minutes.
Joe Tall bring two tables of live play, Stud Hi and Stud8 on BoDog with focus on how to play vs loose players.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 45 minutes.
Bellatrix is discussing the topic of backing agreements with a look at portfolio theory. Homework for the week can be found <a href="http://d2jl7hdveqsyxg.cloudfront.net/Math%20Attacks/homework25.pdf">here.</a>
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 32 minutes.
KasinoKrime reviews some key concepts he finds that many of his students are over-looking across all stakes they play.
Micro/Small Stakes, 6 tables, 51 minutes.
Goldseraph returns with his first video on the Merge network, where he 6-tables full ring NL live and discusses his strategies.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 60 minutes.
Jjyykk recalls what it was like in the early days of his tournament career as he reviews hands from as way back as 2009.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 39 minutes.
Bellatrix talks about growing bankrolls and rational game selection. Here is the <a href="http://d2jl7hdveqsyxg.cloudfront.net/Math%20Attacks/homework24.pdf">homework for the week.</a>
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 91 minutes.
Upon the request of the DC subscribers, OMGClayDol shows you how to partner SNGWiz with HH reviews to get the most out of your post session reviews.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 40 minutes.
Bellatrix covers Risk of Ruin with Uncertain Win Rates, outside influences that can affect our play and bankroll. Homework for this week can be found <a href="http://d2jl7hdveqsyxg.cloudfront.net/Math%20Attacks/homework23.pdf">here.</a>
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 37 minutes.
Saibot is talking about mindsets and developing new habits, then reviews some NLHE concepts with a HH review.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 53 minutes.
Belltrix reviews the Staying in Action: Risk of Ruin. Homework for the week can be found <a href="http://d2jl7hdveqsyxg.cloudfront.net/Math%20Attacks/homework22.pdf"> here.</a>
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 46 minutes.
Orestto's topic of the week is paired boards and as always he approaches it both from a theoretical and HH review standpoint.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 47 minutes.
Bellatrix wraps up section 3 of the book with her own thoughts and notes. Since this is not an actual book section there is no homework.
Micro/Small Stakes, 4 tables, 50 minutes.
Slowlane123 is playing 4-tables, live, or 50NL full-ring while focusing on bet sizing by himself and his opponents.
Micro/Small Stakes, 4 tables, 60 minutes.
BalugaWhale and Kristy review a video submission from a US player, and DC user, on Hero Poker with 4-tables split at 400nl, 200nl, and 100nl.
Micro/Small Stakes, 1 tables, 55 minutes.
Bellatrix talks about a case study in game theory with a fairly philosophical chapter that includes no homework.
