Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by whitelime (Mid Stakes)

LIME-AID 3: Episode Seven

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

LIME-AID 3: Episode Seven by whitelime

whitelime continues to teach how to dominate the $5/10 6max deepstacked games on Full Tilt.

About LIME-AID 3 Subscribe to

Whitelime returns for mid-high 6max NL action.

Tags

whitelime $5/10 $1knl deepstacked deep tables nlhe

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 49 minutes long
  • Posted over 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for LIME-AID 3: Episode Seven

moronicus

Avatar for moronicus

20 posts
Joined 04/2008

Outstanding as usual. Hoping so much for an upcoming season 4! :-)

Posted over 2 years ago

JimmyRare

Avatar for JimmyRare

9 posts
Joined 07/2008

Maybe I am missing something, but when I look at pokertableratings I see this downgoing curve with a $1,6m loss.
Is that site at all accurate?
I mean, hard to find the motivation to watch if the instructor is a losing player, no?

Posted over 2 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

Founder
7149 posts
Joined 11/2006

Hey JimmyRare,

Your question has been asked and answered a couple of times, so I'm going to summarize the answer here:

1) Sites like tableratings don't track even close to 100% accuracy. Google "tableratings accuracy" and search on sites like DeucesCracked and TwoPlusTwo to see tons of examples of hands being ignored (when their mining software misses hands) and hands being double counted.

2) whitelime has run notoriously bad at higher stakes ($200/400+) while soulcrushing normal stakes.

The combination of those two factors has left him with one hell of a graph on Tableratings. You can find other threads on DC, 2p2, and many other sites talking about this. The gist of it is that tableratings is a great site for entertainment, but it's not a site that I'd use to base judgments on players and their caliber of play.

Rob

Posted over 2 years ago

shawshank

Avatar for shawshank

101 posts
Joined 05/2008

Maybe I am missing something, but when I look at pokertableratings I see this downgoing curve with a $1,6m loss.
Is that site at all accurate?
I mean, hard to find the motivation to watch if the instructor is a losing player, no?



I'd watch his videos and base my judgement on his play and his commentary/explanations of table dynamics, his image, and his rationale for doin' what he does @ the table.

Posted over 2 years ago

danndann1

Avatar for danndann1

297 posts
Joined 05/2008

Time Link to 00:04:06

KQ table1
ive notice this on other videos - i think you give up pretty easy on most turns when you barrel - in this particular spot i see no reason to not keep betting on turn:
1) youll make a bigger pot for when you hit (also were deep)
2) you def make him fold better - the low part of his range
3) even if youre gonna be cr here i really dont mind givin the stacks...

Posted over 2 years ago

RainFall

Avatar for RainFall

103 posts
Joined 06/2008

You've spent 7 episodes saying "I can't tell you about things yet". I mean really we can use PTR and see that things aren't going as you'd like.

Posted over 2 years ago

jas

Avatar for jas

8 posts
Joined 05/2008

Outstanding as usual. Hoping so much for an upcoming season 4! :-)



+1

Posted over 2 years ago

deadtime

Avatar for deadtime

97 posts
Joined 08/2008

KQ table1
ive notice this on other videos - i think you give up pretty easy on most turns when you barrel - in this particular spot i see no reason to not keep betting on turn:
1) youll make a bigger pot for when you hit (also were deep)
2) you def make him fold better - the low part of his range
3) even if youre gonna be cr here i really dont mind givin the stacks...



I thought his explanation of why checking in these spots allows us to have it when we raise and the draw comes in on the river was pretty convincing. obv more than one way to skin a cat.

Posted over 2 years ago

danndann1

Avatar for danndann1

297 posts
Joined 05/2008

I thought his explanation of why checking in these spots allows us to have it when we raise and the draw comes in on the river was pretty convincing. obv more than one way to skin a cat.



yeah, i wrote that in real time.

also ive notice that while youre turn lines seems like a little bit passive, your river plays are godlike Smile
nice job!

Posted over 2 years ago

JimmyRare

Avatar for JimmyRare

9 posts
Joined 07/2008

Hey JimmyRare,

Your question has been asked and answered a couple of times, so I'm going to summarize the answer here:

1) Sites like tableratings don't track even close to 100% accuracy. Google "tableratings accuracy" and search on sites like DeucesCracked and TwoPlusTwo to see tons of examples of hands being ignored (when their mining software misses hands) and hands being double counted.

2) whitelime has run notoriously bad at higher stakes ($200/400+) while soulcrushing normal stakes.

The combination of those two factors has left him with one hell of a graph on Tableratings. You can find other threads on DC, 2p2, and many other sites talking about this. The gist of it is that tableratings is a great site for entertainment, but it's not a site that I'd use to base judgments on players and their caliber of play.

Rob



Thanks for the good answer.

Posted over 2 years ago

HonteleJ

Avatar for HonteleJ

10 posts
Joined 03/2008

FYI: DrGiggy is a crazy (in a very solid / LAG way) bluefirepoker instructor.

Posted over 2 years ago

whitelime

Avatar for whitelime

Exec Producer
506 posts
Joined 01/2008

You've spent 7 episodes saying "I can't tell you about things yet". I mean really we can use PTR and see that things aren't going as you'd like.



Well considering only 20% or so of my play is on FTP, even less than 20% has been straight NLHE, and 90% of the cool parts of the show is non-poker related, I think you'll be in for a pleasant treat.

Posted over 2 years ago

whitelime

Avatar for whitelime

Exec Producer
506 posts
Joined 01/2008

Thanks for the good answer.



Tableratings is missing some big pots I won. I'm still down like 900-1000k according to my PT but the vast majority of that was at rail heaven and not even 200/400. I don't know of a single good poker player who hasn't had a 10-15 buying downswing in their career. Check some of the old hh's and you'll cringe.

Posted over 2 years ago

oneillsurfer03

Avatar for oneillsurfer03

1397 posts
Joined 07/2008

Tableratings is missing some big pots I won. I'm still down like 900-1000k according to my PT but the vast majority of that was at rail heaven and not even 200/400. I don't know of a single good poker player who hasn't had a 10-15 buying downswing in their career. Check some of the old hh's and you'll cringe.


i know they have me down 2k at 2/4 but they missed a couple sessions when i took like 3 and 4 buy ins off ppl so i know they miss hands at times so i dont really go buy it.

Posted over 2 years ago

reXne

Avatar for reXne

15 posts
Joined 01/2008

Emil, I really like your videos, but I think 200bb deep with antes is not something that most people play, actually just ftp have those tables. I know its anoying to have to play with shortstackers sometimes but I think it would be better to emulate the real enviroment of a 6max table.

Posted over 2 years ago

DonkHero

Avatar for DonkHero

1160 posts
Joined 07/2008

Maybe I am missing something, but when I look at pokertableratings I see this downgoing curve with a $1,6m loss.
Is that site at all accurate?
I mean, hard to find the motivation to watch if the instructor is a losing player, no?



Challenge Whitelime to HU4ROLLZ then? Or just talk @#$% from the rail...

Posted over 2 years ago

terp

Avatar for terp

Coach
1521 posts
Joined 01/2008

jimmy - of course results matter - they're the only yardstick we have. nobody asks at the end of the year: 'how many people did you outplay?'

that said, results are a pretty extensive composite flattened into a single number. sure, take a look, but go a bit further and try to evaluate how well someone thinks about and approaches the game

Posted over 2 years ago

mikhaylo

Avatar for mikhaylo

1 posts
Joined 05/2009

dangerfish

Avatar for dangerfish

39 posts
Joined 02/2007

One of the best videos I have seen. Well done, you played extremely well imo and explained your thought process for each hand very clear. Very impressive.

Posted over 2 years ago

Wesen

Avatar for Wesen

24 posts
Joined 08/2008

Time Link to 00:29:14

How much more worried are you about a heart on the river if you don't have the JHeart ? Enough to change a QHeart or KHeart river into a check/fold?

Also are there any hands in your range that you would bet/call instead of bet/fold or just shove on a bad rivercard? From your commentary it sounds like it would be a great spot for him to turn a lot of his hands into bluffs if the river hits any part of his range. Or is it just that unlikely that he will read your handrange correctly and also be able to pull the trigger giving you such great odds?

Posted over 2 years ago

hereandnow

Avatar for hereandnow

2 posts
Joined 04/2008

Time Link to 00:43:00

in that J9s hand where you said that your hand looks pretty strong on the turn when the flop gets checked through and you did not expect to get bluffraised there very often.

i actually think in Tim0thee's spot this is a pretty good spot to bluffraise, just because giggy could not have much of a hand here and you could be leading with your whole range (i disagree with you saying your hand looks pretty strong on the turn)...

Posted over 2 years ago



HomePoker Videos → LIME-AID 3 → Episode Seven