Poker Video: Limit Hold'Em by BigBadBabar (High Stakes)

The More the Merrier: Episode Eight

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

The More the Merrier: Episode Eight by BigBadBabar, DosXX

DosXX brings in LHE friend BigBadBabar to review hands from the $5/10 fullring games of their mutual past.

About The More the Merrier Subscribe to

DosXX improves and expands your game selection skills in the LHE world by expanding on the finer points of moving between Mid-stakes 6max and Full Ring games.

Tags

dosxx the more the merrier ipod friendly hh review hand replayer frlhe full ring lhe bigbadbabar

Video Details

  • Game: lhe
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 69 minutes long
  • Posted about 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for The More the Merrier: Episode Eight

or track by Email or RSS

musclepro

Avatar for musclepro

16 posts
Joined 09/2010

Time Link to 00:15:41

at pokerstars now the table volume has gone right down and diff to get more than 2/3 tables of 2/4 or 3/6 and only one table of 5/10 or higher now.

Posted about 2 years ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4439 posts
Joined 03/2007

Time Link to 00:10:50

I think if I'd cap J9 combos on this flop that I should also cap 98 - what do you think?

Upon looking at the hand again I don't think flopcapping QJ would be bad honestly against some players, with free card intentions, although this is not a play I commonly make, and I think vs you it wouldn't be great because there's a reasonable chance you just donk a monster on the turn anyway...?

Maybe a lot of players in those games would just donk the turn anyway with a big hand into a flop cap.

Posted about 2 years ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4439 posts
Joined 03/2007

Time Link to 00:19:03

fun range discussion - I think it's a board texture where it's definitely hard to find a good approach.

Posted about 2 years ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4439 posts
Joined 03/2007

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4439 posts
Joined 03/2007

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4439 posts
Joined 03/2007

Juice

Avatar for Juice

431 posts
Joined 02/2010

good grief Frown




had i paid you yet when you were playing these hands??

Poke Tongue

Posted about 2 years ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4439 posts
Joined 03/2007

I don't think so! IMO DosXX only chose old ones so he could repeatedly own me on camera Smile

Posted about 2 years ago

DosXX

Avatar for DosXX

384 posts
Joined 01/2008

I don't think so! IMO DosXX only chose ones so he could repeatedly own me on camera Smile



New/Old doesn't matter.

Posted about 2 years ago

JaneTheHot

Avatar for JaneTheHot

129 posts
Joined 07/2007

Time Link to 00:05:40

I do not agree that we should call /w 88-99 on this board. You said you would call /w a 7-8s type hand because you think you are drawing to 5 outs. 88 and 99 in this spot is virtually the same hand except for the fact that you are now only drawing to 2 outs vs. 5 potential outs.

Posted about 2 years ago

DosXX

Avatar for DosXX

384 posts
Joined 01/2008

I do not agree that we should call /w 88-99 on this board. You said you would call /w a 7-8s type hand because you think you are drawing to 5 outs. 88 and 99 in this spot is virtually the same hand except for the fact that you are now only drawing to 2 outs vs. 5 potential outs.



I think you are under estimating how nice it is to have 3 more outs and 78 has a backdoor straight draw.

Posted about 2 years ago

JaneTheHot

Avatar for JaneTheHot

129 posts
Joined 07/2007

Explain to me how I am underestimating this.

Posted about 2 years ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4439 posts
Joined 03/2007

the difference between 5 outs and 2 outs is a reasonably large one especially given the pot size? maybe i am not interpreting your question right?

Posted about 2 years ago

JaneTheHot

Avatar for JaneTheHot

129 posts
Joined 07/2007

Right, my point is that this is why we should fold drawing to only two outs vs. drawing to 5 potential outs.

Posted about 2 years ago

JaneTheHot

Avatar for JaneTheHot

129 posts
Joined 07/2007

Time Link to 00:20:36

I am not sure that the bet on the river is super standard. What do you want him to call you with that you are beating? If he slowplayed a K, he can now easily C/R for value, if he had something like 10s he is likely to fold on the turn. With any other ace you are chopping and not really getting any value either.

Posted about 2 years ago

DosXX

Avatar for DosXX

384 posts
Joined 01/2008

I think I was confused as to what you are arguing vs. what was said in the video. I think we should probably fold 88/99 on the flop and call 78s. Does that sound reasonable to you?

Posted about 2 years ago

DosXX

Avatar for DosXX

384 posts
Joined 01/2008

I am not sure that the bet on the river is super standard. What do you want him to call you with that you are beating? If he slowplayed a K, he can now easily C/R for value, if he had something like 10s he is likely to fold on the turn. With any other ace you are chopping and not really getting any value either.



In my experience people call wider than an ace minimum in this spot. Lots of people won't cap and then they take this flop/turn and end up on the river with QQ/JJ/99/88 and don't want to fold since part of not capping preflop is under-repping their hand. Sure we chop with aces and now lose to a king that was waiting for the turn, but we also don't lose to any ace and how likely is it somebody shows up here with a king, given 2 on board and the post flop action?

Posted about 2 years ago

JaneTheHot

Avatar for JaneTheHot

129 posts
Joined 07/2007

I agree with underrepresenting your hand range, but Todd is not just any player and he realizes that if you bet on flop and turn on this board that you will usually have a strong hand and not bluffing all that much. I think you would check back QQ-88 on this board with intention of giving or calling on certain rivers. In other words, your range when you bet on the turn is quite value oriented and hence he should probably fold his 3rd pair hands.

Posted about 2 years ago

JaneTheHot

Avatar for JaneTheHot

129 posts
Joined 07/2007

I think I was confused as to what you are arguing vs. what was said in the video. I think we should probably fold 88/99 on the flop and call 78s. Does that sound reasonable to you?



Yes, I am glad we are on the same page.

Posted about 2 years ago



HomePoker Videos → The More the Merrier → Episode Eight