McDoxy
79 posts
Joined 02/2009
Nice video man!
Gives me some new thoughts about crushing NL50. I'm going to move up pretty soon so this should help.
You're English was pretty good and definitely understandable. I know this because I'm German myself and spent a whole year in USA. Where do you live in Germany if I might ask? If you don't want to answer this here, just send me a PM or something 
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
samwise
28 posts
Joined 07/2008
Great video, your english was perfectly understandable.
Thought you made a great point about people not thinking the same way as you, i think thats something i need to think about while playing and should help a lot with handreading.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Snotbag
40 posts
Joined 11/2008
PokerBachelor
1 posts
Joined 05/2009
bosshafter_boss
3 posts
Joined 09/2008
z324739
Section 9
382 posts
Joined 03/2008
pkrlvr
Ship it imo
341 posts
Joined 09/2008
hopscotch
311 posts
Joined 03/2008
Time Link to 00:02:15
Possibly being results oriented here, but I think we should just pot bet bet this board (33 on QJ3. He could check behind with quite a few things like flush draws, hands which have some equity but could raise or call our bet like AK/AT. He could also call with underpairs like TT-44 or Jx.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
samwise
28 posts
Joined 07/2008
Possibly being results oriented here, but I think we should just pot bet bet this board (33 on QJ3. He could check behind with quite a few things like flush draws, hands which have some equity but could raise or call our bet like AK/AT. He could also call with underpairs like TT-44 or Jx.
I agree with this reasoning, the fact he is short-stacked and passive should also make us want to lead this flop.
Any thoughts Ambtndplyr?
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
forker
988 posts
Joined 05/2008
donkmaster
10 posts
Joined 05/2008
E A F R
192 posts
Joined 04/2009
Liked it, easy to understand, you speak more clearly than I do. Tons of interesting information/topics... excellent first vid, or any vid for that matter. Looking forward to future videos, keep 'em coming!
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Guitierez
260 posts
Joined 07/2008
tubasteve
7647 posts
Joined 11/2007
What's your reasoning in checking behind the turn? We have a ton of equity with our pair + OESD + FD. If you don't take it down immediatly we'll build a nice pot and possibly stack villain on the river.
this is an awful card to bet as it really improves his flop calling range, plus our FD isn't really worth much since it is T high.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
HonteleJ
10 posts
Joined 03/2008
Very nice video, I have a similar style, except for some things and I'd like your thoughts about it:
- I'm not even tempted to raise the limpers from the BB with 42o or 82o (you didn't raise with 82o, but it seemed you were thinking about it), but I would always isolate a limper with Q3s on the button and you didn't. Some other spots like that appeared in the video and I would like to know why you prefer opening any2 in BB versus a limp + caller instead of opening Q3s, Kx type of hands against one limper in position?
- The other hand I play differently is when you raise the 66 in CO against the MP opener. I would just call and hope some others call behind. But I also liked your raise and I'm going to experiment with that. What are your thoughts about this? Would you 3b any PP against any player that opens in MP or in what circumstances do you think 3b a PP (low, medium, high) >> calling a PP?
Looking forward to some answers and your next vid!
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
ambtndplyr
379 posts
Joined 02/2009
hey guys...
thank you for critics so far.
unfortunately im out of town atm and not too many possibilities to be online.
i will be available online from thursday night near to 24/7 and answer here and to all ur pms
thanks so far, hope things are well
cu on thursday
martin
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
shades
846 posts
Joined 06/2008
tubasteve
7647 posts
Joined 11/2007
Very nice video, I have a similar style, except for some things and I'd like your thoughts about it:
- I'm not even tempted to raise the limpers from the BB with 42o or 82o (you didn't raise with 82o, but it seemed you were thinking about it), but I would always isolate a limper with Q3s on the button and you didn't. Some other spots like that appeared in the video and I would like to know why you prefer opening any2 in BB versus a limp + caller instead of opening Q3s, Kx type of hands against one limper in position?
- The other hand I play differently is when you raise the 66 in CO against the MP opener. I would just call and hope some others call behind. But I also liked your raise and I'm going to experiment with that. What are your thoughts about this? Would you 3b any PP against any player that opens in MP or in what circumstances do you think 3b a PP (low, medium, high) >> calling a PP?
Looking forward to some answers and your next vid!
I hate to come into other coaches threads and make comments that aren't addressed to me, but I don't think 3-betting small pocket pairs IP is nearly ever a good idea. If you are worried about implied odds vs. a wide-ish range, don't be. You can outplay people postflop with position, easily making up for the times that you miss the set.
Plus hitting sets is fucking awesome.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Danny
32 posts
Joined 06/2008
Snotbag
40 posts
Joined 11/2008
I hate to come into other coaches threads and make comments that aren't addressed to me, but I don't think 3-betting small pocket pairs IP is nearly ever a good idea. If you are worried about implied odds vs. a wide-ish range, don't be. You can outplay people postflop with position, easily making up for the times that you miss the set.
Plus hitting sets is fucking awesome.
When on the button with small pocket pairs i generally call when MP open raises but 3bet if the CO open raises as i dont feel i have the implied odds for set mining.
Would you agree with any of that?
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
B00GIE
2 posts
Joined 05/2009
fishsticks
11 posts
Joined 04/2008
tubasteve
7647 posts
Joined 11/2007
When on the button with small pocket pairs i generally call when MP open raises but 3bet if the CO open raises as i dont feel i have the implied odds for set mining.
Would you agree with any of that?
reread my post
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
WhiteHeatSYD
Real Life Grinder
847 posts
Joined 09/2007
nstip1
49 posts
Joined 05/2008
When on the button with small pocket pairs i generally call when MP open raises but 3bet if the CO open raises as i dont feel i have the implied odds for set mining.
Would you agree with any of that?
Youre not setmining. Think about it...when his range isnt strong enough to setmine,u should be able to make all sorts of stuff in position postflop to get him off his hand,ducy ?
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
gsolis31
4 posts
Joined 07/2008
mattcky2876
6 posts
Joined 08/2009
Harrythedog
6 posts
Joined 09/2009
Frank rizzo
13 posts
Joined 02/2010
I hate to come into other coaches threads and make comments that aren't addressed to me, but I don't think 3-betting small pocket pairs IP is nearly ever a good idea. If you are worried about implied odds vs. a wide-ish range, don't be. You can outplay people postflop with position, easily making up for the times that you miss the set.
Plus hitting sets is fucking awesome.
I think he decided to 3bet the PP IP because the villain was a little over a half stack.
Posted about 3 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Frank rizzo
13 posts
Joined 02/2010