Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by fslexcduck (Mid Stakes)

GMandatory: Episode Four

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

GMandatory: Episode Four by fslexcduck, Gman

GMandatory takes on our own Vanessa Selbst on two tables of $2/4 HU NLHE. He reviews his play after the fact and enlightens you to his thought processes and his analysis of Vanessa's play.

About GMandatory Subscribe to

Gman’s debut heads up NL series. In each episode Garret will play a DC Executive Producer heads up. The catch? The EP must play according to certain restrictions designed to mimic player types. Featuring in-depth discussion on developing optimal counter-strategies vs obvious leaks, as well as high-level psychology and leveling. Can the EPs escape their straitjackets, or will Gman dominate?

Tags

gman nlhe heads up hu nlhe 2-tabling vanessa selbst $2/4 gmandatory

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 77 minutes long
  • Posted about 4 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for GMandatory: Episode Four

or track by Email or RSS

Deszcz

Avatar for Deszcz

17 posts
Joined 06/2008

dude: fslexcduck; something like: physlexic-duck not felix-duck Wink

Posted about 4 years ago

Boom Boom

Avatar for Boom Boom

28 posts
Joined 11/2008

uhjustmint

Avatar for uhjustmint

9 posts
Joined 07/2008

the vid is not loading for me anyone else having this problem?

edit: works now

Posted about 4 years ago

2fouroffsuit

Avatar for 2fouroffsuit

1770 posts
Joined 01/2008

This series is one of the most interesting ever put out on DC and I love that the rules aren't know ahead if time now. It creates such a great dynamic and Gman's commentary is superb.

Posted about 4 years ago

heret1k

Avatar for heret1k

7 posts
Joined 04/2008

bdc30

Avatar for bdc30

16 posts
Joined 04/2008

gmandatory, episode 4: like; the return, like, of the likes

Posted about 4 years ago

TemFriendPat

Avatar for TemFriendPat

10 posts
Joined 03/2009

Excellent commentary Gman.

However i can't help but feel that these rules are something of a distraction, and that it would be more interesting to simply see you playing against each-other. possibly separate videos from each of you would be an option.

Posted about 4 years ago

jackoneill

Avatar for jackoneill

3 posts
Joined 11/2008

Excellent video and the best one in this series so far :-)

Great play from both of you and an excellent commentary.

Btw. please, please do not post any of the rules here in the forum, it was so much fun to watch the video and try to figure them out.

Posted about 4 years ago

fslexcduck

Avatar for fslexcduck

419 posts
Joined 10/2007

Hey Garret,

thanks for all the kind words about my play! I really did have a lot of fun playing this and I wish I had more time because once I figured out how to play more optimally, the match was over!

I had a few general comments - I think the rules actually influenced my play more than you think. I fired a looooot fewer double barrels than I normally would, because I had to bluff the river and you seemed to not like to fold that much (that was my impression anyways), so I didn't want to bluff the pot and set myself up for an expensive -EV play. I wish I could have checked more flops to fully balance for the strategy of not 2nd barreling too much, but unfortunately the rules didn't allow me to do that.

I think not playing buttons has more of an effect than you think - you wind up 3betting way less, if really at all, and it just creates a much different dynamic than we're necessarily used to. I don't know who it's better for necessarily in general, but personally, I love defending light 3bettors in position, and I didn't get a chance to do it that much.

Finally, the idea about flatting all of my hands out of position - I think you did a great job of explaining some of the reasons, but I wanted to expound a little bit. Basically, I didn't stop because I was afraid you wouldn't call necessarily. I just thought that a) it would be super easy to realize I only showed up with strong hands after 3 betting and I wouldn't get paid off, b) it would make my calling OOP range very unbalanced b/c instead of all medium strength hands I would only have low and medium strength hands (and once again I thought it would be fairly easy to pick up on this), and c) I didn't want to bloat the pot OOP because of the rule where I had to bluff the river... so if I 3bet with KQ and the flop came A34r, I had to cbet and bet the river, which means I was committing my entire stack in a situation in which you are really rarely going to fold. There is an argument that you might get leveled the first time and make a big fold since "I shouldn't be bluffing," but even if that were the case (which I doubt and still think that line would be hugely -EV), if you figured out it was a rule, I would really really be screwed.

Anyway, great analysis. You definitely definitely outleveled me in many spots and I'm really looking forward to playing again.

<3
Duck (Pronounced "fyslexic duck" ;-) )

Posted about 4 years ago

Gman

Avatar for Gman

282 posts
Joined 10/2008

Excellent video and the best one in this series so far :-)

Great play from both of you and an excellent commentary.

Btw. please, please do not post any of the rules here in the forum, it was so much fun to watch the video and try to figure them out.



I agree. In all videos including this one I will include the rules at the end of the audio (don't cheat)!

Posted about 4 years ago

Gman

Avatar for Gman

282 posts
Joined 10/2008

Hey Garret,

thanks for all the kind words about my play! I really did have a lot of fun playing this and I wish I had more time because once I figured out how to play more optimally, the match was over!

I had a few general comments - I think the rules actually influenced my play more than you think. I fired a looooot fewer double barrels than I normally would, because I had to bluff the river and you seemed to not like to fold that much (that was my impression anyways), so I didn't want to bluff the pot and set myself up for an expensive -EV play. I wish I could have checked more flops to fully balance for the strategy of not 2nd barreling too much, but unfortunately the rules didn't allow me to do that.

I think not playing buttons has more of an effect than you think - you wind up 3betting way less, if really at all, and it just creates a much different dynamic than we're necessarily used to. I don't know who it's better for necessarily in general, but personally, I love defending light 3bettors in position, and I didn't get a chance to do it that much.

Finally, the idea about flatting all of my hands out of position - I think you did a great job of explaining some of the reasons, but I wanted to expound a little bit. Basically, I didn't stop because I was afraid you wouldn't call necessarily. I just thought that a) it would be super easy to realize I only showed up with strong hands after 3 betting and I wouldn't get paid off, b) it would make my calling OOP range very unbalanced b/c instead of all medium strength hands I would only have low and medium strength hands (and once again I thought it would be fairly easy to pick up on this), and c) I didn't want to bloat the pot OOP because of the rule where I had to bluff the river... so if I 3bet with KQ and the flop came A34r, I had to cbet and bet the river, which means I was committing my entire stack in a situation in which you are really rarely going to fold. There is an argument that you might get leveled the first time and make a big fold since "I shouldn't be bluffing," but even if that were the case (which I doubt and still think that line would be hugely -EV), if you figured out it was a rule, I would really really be screwed.

Anyway, great analysis. You definitely definitely outleveled me in many spots and I'm really looking forward to playing again.

<3
Duck (Pronounced "fyslexic duck" ;-) )



Not much to add, agree w/ all of this. I really appreciate you taking the time to consider all of this before/during the match. It made my life much more difficult, thus making for a more interesting video.

Posted about 4 years ago

allinriver

Avatar for allinriver

5 posts
Joined 01/2011

Vanessa did you bluff the board 6QQ6Q on the river because of the rules or because you think it is a +EV bluff?
Gman says you have complete immunity for pushing the river, but this bluff should work 2 out of 3 times. Gman doesnt have the board beat really often but I assume he will call with 77+ Qx.
By giving up the river, you share the pot quite often, So i guess its not so bad to give up. Or do you think its a mandatory bluff since your value range is wide as well?
Very interesting hand !

Posted 4 months ago



HomePoker Videos → GMandatory → Episode Four