---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by whitelime (Mid Stakes)

Always wanted to do this...first!

Great as always. Is there some way though to sync the audio and video?

It's a nice video but one thing bothers me big time. The sound is way ahead of the image, so we hear: I'm just gonna repop this, before the other guy even bets. We hear: I'll just fold nine-seven offsuit, even before we see the hand. It's quite annoying, but otherwise great video.

wtf @ shoving 2k over villains $50 bet on river at 13 min, wouldnt a raise to 200 accomplish the same thing?

wtf @ shoving 2k over villains $50 bet on river at 13 min, wouldnt a raise to 200 accomplish the same thing?

Agreed, big bet to win 100 bucks?

It's a nice video but one thing bothers me big time. The sound is way ahead of the image, so we hear: I'm just gonna repop this, before the other guy even bets. We hear: I'll just fold nine-seven offsuit, even before we see the hand. It's quite annoying, but otherwise great video.

I'll take a look at this ASAP and get a new version up today for you guys w/better sync.

Rob

nice, however maybe you could do a couple of 100bb videos in the future ?
I understand that a lot of players have trouble adjusting to 200bb's but majority of the tables are still 100bb and it would be cool to watch you play on them as well (less room for 3-betting and splashing around in general, basically minimized toolbox), thanks

Really unwatchable with the sound, checking the videos before making them public isnt to much to ask is it?

Really unwatchable with the sound, checking the videos before making them public isnt to much to ask is it?

No, it's definitely not too much to ask. The problem with catching these (in this case) is that our video guy Rusty watched the first part of it to check but not the entire hour vid, and this type of sync issue is progressive so it gets worse over the course of the vid (seems fine when you watch the first part but get off by more and more). Somehow the framerate of the videos is off by about .09% which is enough to cause pretty drastic changes down the road.

That said I've talked with Rusty and he'll be checking Emil's vids out in the future throughout the video (taking samples from the first 5min, middle 5min, last 5min for example) at the same time as I'm trying to figure out what on Emil's computer is causing this to happen.

Thanks for the patience,
Rob

There is a new mp4 version up and running, I will get the new wmv up as soon as it is done producing. Thanks for your patience.
-Rusty

Ok something got crossed. I have now put up LIME-AID EP7 mp4 and wmv.
-Rusty

Ok something got crossed. I have now put up LIME-AID EP7 mp4 and wmv.
-Rusty

thanks, rusty.

good job dc on always being the best site for fixing problems straight away and listening to your customers. dling this one now!

dude, you are crazy

I am so happy that i joined this site.. Love to see MANY video's of whitelime and KRANTZ. Cardrunners became a big joke. Releasing maybe 1 or 2 good video's (Containing something you can learn when you play nl200 and higher) a month.

Wouldn't a smaller river check raise w the 77 be more believable?

Hello White Lime great vid I have a question about the hand you played at 31:35. When you float with AQ on the 897 board and then hit an A on the turn, you say you expect him to call because of your crazy image. If he's unable to fold to an A turn do you think he will really fold to any other cards besides perhaps a 10? Also it seems there might be some reverse implied odds considering his range is pretty strong in that spot, if you hit a Q on the turn theres a decent chance its not good. Obviously it worked out well for you but in a vacuum do you think that is a good spot to float, if so why?

Agreed, big bet to win 100 bucks?

People are dumb and will call smaller raises not understanding two pair is a bluff catcher. They'll fold one pair Ax and call w/ two pair which makes no sense. So I'll put them to the test for their whole stack...

Hello White Lime great vid I have a question about the hand you played at 31:35. When you float with AQ on the 897 board and then hit an A on the turn, you say you expect him to call because of your crazy image. If he's unable to fold to an A turn do you think he will really fold to any other cards besides perhaps a 10? Also it seems there might be some reverse implied odds considering his range is pretty strong in that spot, if you hit a Q on the turn theres a decent chance its not good. Obviously it worked out well for you but in a vacuum do you think that is a good spot to float, if so why?

They are different cards. The T connects hard w/ the range of hands i call the flop with whereas the A doesn't.

They are different cards. The T connects hard w/ the range of hands i call the flop with whereas the A doesn't.

True which is why I said i expected him to fold to a 10/J turn. What was your plan for if the turn was a queen? and would you have tried to steal if the turn was a 6?

People are dumb and will call smaller raises not understanding two pair is a bluff catcher. They'll fold one pair Ax and call w/ two pair which makes no sense. So I'll put them to the test for their whole stack...

I agree this bet WILL accomplish making the guy fold a whoooole lot, but how often does he need to fold to this in order for it to be +EV? I'm too lazy to do the exact, exact math but shoving $2102 to win $117, doesn't this require him folding I don't know, 95% of the time or something? I mean even if the guy hasn't even looked at his cards yet and has a random 2 cards, he will have better than 2nd set (JJJ) here a staggering 5.152% of the time. So you are hoping that he NEVER hero calls top set or a non-nut straight here, EVER, in order for this raise to BREAK EVEN.

I mean it's hard to put this guy on a set or straight too obviously, but it's also going to be pretty hard for him to put YOU on a nut hand here I'd think, which should increase his frequency of hero calling. And I mean if he hero calls even a TEENY TINY amount here, and I'm talking about hero calls with like a set or two pair, you're losing money. If this guy ever assumes your range is super polarized to nuts or air and starts making hero calls with like aces up here, you are totally screwed.

So I mean I do think this is going to make him fold non-nut hands a huge percentage of the time, but like 100%? Cause even if he hero calls like 5% of the time and has huge hands some other percentage you're already losing money and man, this play just seems weird.

Also I mean is raising to $800 or $1000 going to make much difference? Is this guy going to suddenly call way looser than for $2100? Or make some sick minraise bluffshove with a hand he would have folded for the full $2100?

Anyway one nice thing is after this video, Whitelime is going to get paid with the nuts a lot more on rivers like this where people remember this wacky, wacky hand

Enjoying this series Emil, not going to go into a bunch of specific hands but overall I am def getting a feel for how to play more loose aggressive. Keep the live play videos coming, but maybe take it a step farther with explanation of your image, I find that about 10 times per video you bring up your image, your maniacal image etc, maybe extend that to 'I have x image, so opponent is putting me on this range of hands rather than these hands he might put a standard TAG on' etc. That is my only minor suggestion but this series is prob my 2nd favorite atm to Coaching Tree.

nice video, but that check-shove with 77 kinda confused me... you risk so much to win so little.. :-\

oh i have a question, in the hand 40mins in where you have 75 on K63ss 4 J and you overbet the river for $750 in a $477 pot. i wondered how you chose your overbet size, im kind of experimenting with overbetting, but i think i make it too big sometimes.

anyway, loving this series

i let DC down with my terrible play
get u next time emil!!!!!