---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Ansky (High Stakes)

sick

I really like the objectivity you bring to your own hands. normally i really like to watch recent sessions but i really like the concept of looking at your past hands and how youd play them better today.

great job, 5 stars, etc

nice series

Time Link to 00:42:26

Dani,

You say Tom's bluff isn't that bad considering you tanked. But it looks like his bluff needs to work about 40.8/(40.8+64.6)=38.7% of the time to break even. Can't imagine that's going to be true...

Great vids, keep up the good work!

Ethan

Time Link to 00:14:28

what do you mean by 1 1/2 streets of value?

what do you mean by 1 1/2 streets of value?

either 1 or 2 streets, avg 1.5

Great video & feedback....Ty! Much appreciated.

OMG the threetime win the flop on the flop segment is just hilarious

Maybe I am a masochist but I loved Dani getting enraged at his own play............Sorry man but its pretty funny to listen to.

Time Link to 00:25:28

Would you call it off with AJ, no draw ? (so far Tom was not seen/caught doing and crazy turn bluffing)

Would you call it off with AJ, no draw ? (so far Tom was not seen/caught doing and crazy turn bluffing)

of course, he can have worse for value

Thanks!

Do you think he could do it with KJ or QJ ?

What the hell is Ansky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fjd64jk83WU

Time Link to 00:07:43

In the AJs hand
if you have the ace of hearts in your hand are you leading or CR the 4th heart on the river?
leading i assume because tom isnt likely to call a CR and will check back a ton of hands on a 4 flush river, correct?

Time Link to 00:10:28

"if your not then your probably a fish "
lol!

really enjoyed the vid Dani, I like how you're capable and willing to point out your past weaknesses and bad plays. one minor suggestion would be showing more pots where or Tom make moves with air, or very weak semibluffing hands.

really enjoyed the vid Dani, I like how you're capable and willing to point out your past weaknesses and bad plays. one minor suggestion would be showing more pots where or Tom make moves with air, or very weak semibluffing hands.

I am reviewing every single >10bb pot.

Just wanted to say I thoroughly enjoyed the rage at the conclusion of this video.

Time Link to 00:36:21

I am very confused at why 4 betting the flop is good? I would think calling his flop 3 bet is the far superior play because the pot is getting big already and he almost always has to bet the turn. Thanks and great great series so far, I am a brand new member to this site and it is by far my FAV great work everyone who puts out vids!

Time Link to 00:04:00

You say it is not good to c/r this board because there are so many bad ways the board can run out. But how does leading solve that problem? Isn't it better to get as much money in now as possible, before those bad cards come out? Our hand is so strong here I don't understand how the best line is not also the one that gets the most money in on the flop. Aside from balancing and deception purposes, isn't the general goal to get the most money in when we're the farthest ahead?

How are we not strong enough to check raise? Are we waiting to flop a straight? We almost cannot have a set here since we didn't 3bet pre so our value c/r range is almost non existant if this isn't in it. Is jacks up strong enough to c/r? If so, why? It's harder to get called when we have a jack in our hand.

I understand lead > c/r because he will check behind. But I don't get that if we had checked we would only call and somehow not consider that slowplaying on a super wet flop aka bad.

Also at 51:54 when we try to value bet a set of 7s on a 4 flush board aren't we then also deciding to value bet the 2 of diamonds? So what would our bluff catching range be here? If we're bluff catching with one pair hands then aren't we opening ourselves up to be value bet into ridiculously light?

You say it is not good to c/r this board because there are so many bad ways the board can run out. But how does leading solve that problem? Isn't it better to get as much money in now as possible, before those bad cards come out? Our hand is so strong here I don't understand how the best line is not also the one that gets the most money in on the flop. Aside from balancing and deception purposes, isn't the general goal to get the most money in when we're the farthest ahead?

How are we not strong enough to check raise? Are we waiting to flop a straight? We almost cannot have a set here since we didn't 3bet pre so our value c/r range is almost non existant if this isn't in it. Is jacks up strong enough to c/r? If so, why? It's harder to get called when we have a jack in our hand.

I understand lead > c/r because he will check behind. But I don't get that if we had checked we would only call and somehow not consider that slowplaying on a super wet flop aka bad.

Also at 51:54 when we try to value bet a set of 7s on a 4 flush board aren't we then also deciding to value bet the 2 of diamonds? So what would our bluff catching range be here? If we're bluff catching with one pair hands then aren't we opening ourselves up to be value bet into ridiculously light?

You are mostly right, but leading leaves the option of bet/3betting, and getting the money in before the board gets disastrous, whereas if you c/r, he might just call and play very well versus our hand.

You are mostly right, but leading leaves the option of bet/3betting, and getting the money in before the board gets disastrous, whereas if you c/r, he might just call and play very well versus our hand.

Ditto he might just call our lead right? But you would be familiar enough with his play that you would think he'd raise your lead a good amount of the time, so you'd get the opportunity to b/3b quite often, right?

Time Link to 00:44:12

I actually think the river shove is pretty creative because you would never think he is bluffing here giving you such great odds. Of course the other side of it is when people get those odds + it's Tom Dwan I think they call lol.

Time Link to 00:29:05

Hmm, he would rather be calling 3x, 6x then bet those with himself right ? so like don't you actually get kinda more value here by betting yourself? as what I think it looks as a scary board to Always be betting it in Dwans position ? so like despite what you say here, that play would actually be correct ?