Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by sthief09 (Mid Stakes)

Professor Plotkin: Episode Six

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Professor Plotkin: Episode Six by sthief09

Class is in session and Professor Plotkin is addressing the topic of 3 Bets. Take a closer look at 3 Bet ranges, pushing 3 bets, calling 3 bets, and min 3 betting.

About Professor Plotkin Subscribe to

sthief09 shows us how to develop various optimal game strategies including 3-betting and 4-betting at mid-stakes 6max NLHE, using PokerStove to break down hand ranges and analyze HEM stats.

Tags

sthief09 professor plotkin 3-betting hand ranges powerpoint ipod friendly

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 53 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Professor Plotkin: Episode Six

TheBeloved

Avatar for TheBeloved

77 posts
Joined 01/2008

shyturtle27

Avatar for shyturtle27

394 posts
Joined 02/2008

Calling 3-bets? I LOVE to call 3-bets!!!

Posted over 3 years ago

temper

Avatar for temper

21 posts
Joined 08/2008

I don't get why gutshots have a much higher equity than over cards.
There are 6 outs to overcards, but only 4 with a gutter.
Any idea why a gutter has more equity?

Posted over 3 years ago

vtpokerleague

Avatar for vtpokerleague

120 posts
Joined 05/2008

I don't get why gutshots have a much higher equity than over cards.
There are 6 outs to overcards, but only 4 with a gutter.
Any idea why a gutter has more equity?



Overcard outs aren't "clean", you can hit them and still be behind, also they may kill further action if you do hit.

Gutshots are more deceptive.

Posted over 3 years ago

sriverfx19

Avatar for sriverfx19

16 posts
Joined 09/2008

I don't get why gutshots have a much higher equity than over cards.
There are 6 outs to overcards, but only 4 with a gutter.
Any idea why a gutter has more equity?



Overcards have almost zero equity vs. sets and AA, and 3 outs vs. KK/QQ/AK. Gutshot can have up to 10 outs vs. AK, etc and always has 4 outs.

Posted over 3 years ago

sagehens

Avatar for sagehens

22 posts
Joined 07/2008

awesome video. i found the charts very helpful and easy to understand. Any way you can post the charts or the excel sheets? i love the chart with the need hand equities in order for a shove to be profitable.

Posted over 3 years ago

yobbo

Avatar for yobbo

190 posts
Joined 12/2007

Interesting discussion of the scenario with 87 vs 99 on t72. If we had T9 in that spot it'd be difficult to figure out the best line as if 87 is a profitable shove then "semibluffing" top pair with say 23% equity would be. I guess it's just a situation where the difficulty of calling and seeing later streets comes into play to determine which is the most +EV play.

Posted over 3 years ago

RobsonFan

Avatar for RobsonFan

255 posts
Joined 09/2008

awesome video. i found the charts very helpful and easy to understand. Any way you can post the charts or the excel sheets? i love the chart with the need hand equities in order for a shove to be profitable.



yea all the charts would be very cool

Posted over 3 years ago

JJack

Avatar for JJack

284 posts
Joined 10/2007

35 min

KQ at Q72r flop

we have more EV of pushing
352*0.39*0.628 = (-86) {at example was -91} so difrence between push or min raise is not so small

Posted over 3 years ago

Trix

Avatar for Trix

149 posts
Joined 01/2008

It seems easier to get people to fold on the high boards in my experience. Think the reason is that they have less outs if they are wrong, so they are less likely to push light vs a small raise.

Posted over 3 years ago

dwightschrute

Avatar for dwightschrute

70 posts
Joined 06/2008

hey great vid, sthief. clearly u have a put a lot of work into these. Lots of good info... Here are a couple questions-

1) You say that as the high card gets lower, we should be more inclined to fight back (ie 10 7 2) regardless of 3 bet range. But a little later, u say that once he cbets, he will generally have a lot more strong hands in his range (which would make me think we shouldn't play back much). How can these two pieces of info be reconciled?

2) You said that against the loose 3 bet range, we can play back at more ace hi boards, which definitely makes sense. I'd like to know a good threshold for what type of hands are appropriate to play back with. (i.e. perhaps the semi bluff push w/ 87 is a good example) How often is good to make the small bluff raise here w/ total air? (for example, doing this 100% of the time w/ our air is way too much...)

So basically just kind of curious about exactly which hands, and how often, it is optimal to play back on the various flops.


3) As for calling 3 bets in position, what would u suggest as a good starting point for learning exactly what hands to defend against different 3 bet ranges? (can't remember if any of ur vids in this series addressed this specifically). When I watch vids, guys are always defending slightly different types of hands. When I play, I just basically am guessing, and don't really have a great handle on what to defend against whom.


Guess that's enough questions for now! I think this type of analysis definitely serves to raise a lot of questions (which is good if u know how to solve them!). Nice work on this.

Posted over 3 years ago

JJack

Avatar for JJack

284 posts
Joined 10/2007

Also last 3 min ...

how big is our profit by calling with 87
at video is profit about 40$ but 0.54*158-046*60 = 52.7$
Am I right?

Posted over 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

I don't get why gutshots have a much higher equity than over cards.
There are 6 outs to overcards, but only 4 with a gutter.
Any idea why a gutter has more equity?




like the other person said, when you have overcards, there's a chance you run into AA, a set, or a hand that has you reverse dominated (AT vs AQ on Txy). in all this cases, the gutter is still clean, because for the most part, it's drawing to the nuts.

Posted over 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

35 min

KQ at Q72r flop

we have more EV of pushing
352*0.39*0.628 = (-86) {at example was -91} so difrence between push or min raise is not so small




hey, looks like i made a couple of mistakes. i'm going to go back and fix these up in a week or two, and have it re-posted. sorry about that

Posted over 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

It seems easier to get people to fold on the high boards in my experience. Think the reason is that they have less outs if they are wrong, so they are less likely to push light vs a small raise.




i think i accounted for this in my numbers, making it more likely that someone would push with AK or AQ over a small raise on a T high board, than on a Q or J high board. it still shows that you'll have more success on low boards.

Posted over 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007


1) You say that as the high card gets lower, we should be more inclined to fight back (ie 10 7 2) regardless of 3 bet range. But a little later, u say that once he cbets, he will generally have a lot more strong hands in his range (which would make me think we shouldn't play back much). How can these two pieces of info be reconciled?



they are both true. the second statement is just relative to his old range. the charts after the c-bet reflect this. you should factor in both effects, because sometimes one will be stronger than the other.


2) You said that against the loose 3 bet range, we can play back at more ace hi boards, which definitely makes sense. I'd like to know a good threshold for what type of hands are appropriate to play back with. (i.e. perhaps the semi bluff push w/ 87 is a good example) How often is good to make the small bluff raise here w/ total air? (for example, doing this 100% of the time w/ our air is way too much...)



asking how often you should do something is more a matter of metagame than anything else. in a vacuum, if you're getting laid the correct price to bluffraise, you should do it 100% of the time. in reality, if you keep doing it, your opponent will adjust and c-bet less, or call your push more, and conversely if you have a snug image, you should absolutely do it. as far as whether or not you should do it in a vacuum, that's the focus of the video.


3) As for calling 3 bets in position, what would u suggest as a good starting point for learning exactly what hands to defend against different 3 bet ranges? (can't remember if any of ur vids in this series addressed this specifically). When I watch vids, guys are always defending slightly different types of hands. When I play, I just basically am guessing, and don't really have a great handle on what to defend against whom.



in position, AA-88 (depending which you 4-bet), AQ, AJs, KQs is a pretty solid and balanced range. make sure you call AA and KK sometimes and don't always 4-bet. the looser the range, the more you want to call with AA and KK

Posted over 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

awesome video. i found the charts very helpful and easy to understand. Any way you can post the charts or the excel sheets? i love the chart with the need hand equities in order for a shove to be profitable.



here you go: https://www.yousendit.com/download/Y2ovRE9wMGt3NUpjR0E9PQ

Posted over 3 years ago

simonpoker

Avatar for simonpoker

1215 posts
Joined 02/2008

Just a question: I should shove T72r flop with J9 like 100% time ? and with 22 I should make a small raise?If its that easy, its printing money lol

Posted over 3 years ago

dwightschrute

Avatar for dwightschrute

70 posts
Joined 06/2008

cool, thanks for the nice, clear respoonses.

Posted over 3 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

Just a question: I should shove T72r flop with J9 like 100% time ? and with 22 I should make a small raise?If its that easy, its printing money lol



its not my video, but i would just say keep in mind calling is an option when we have hands like a set as well.

Posted over 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

its not my video, but i would just say keep in mind calling is an option when we have hands like a set as well.



yeah i think the conclusion was basically you need to really mix up the way you play your big hands, because there are many effective ways to bluff depending on your hand

Posted over 3 years ago

MissTaken79

Avatar for MissTaken79

5 posts
Joined 10/2008

Really enjoying this series some interesting things to think about, would like to do this myself. Any chance of getting some links to your spreadsheets , the above link has expired.

Posted over 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

IRLsucks

Avatar for IRLsucks

3 posts
Joined 03/2008

Please post this link again. Or find another way to post them Smile

Posted over 3 years ago

Patjeto

Avatar for Patjeto

191 posts
Joined 09/2008

Im also very very interested in downloading the excel file. Any change the file can be reposted? Many thanx in advance.

Posted over 3 years ago

udownwithvpp

Avatar for udownwithvpp

1114 posts
Joined 04/2008

JhnGC

Avatar for JhnGC

52 posts
Joined 09/2008

bump for excel sheet


what he said tia

Posted about 3 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

the link below is all of the spreadsheets. if anyone needs these in the future, please PM me. I don't have a permanent link to these, but I kind of like it that way.

http://www.yousendit.com/download/U0d6Zm1SZ1BlM1R2Wmc9PQ

Posted about 3 years ago

JhnGC

Avatar for JhnGC

52 posts
Joined 09/2008

the link below is all of the spreadsheets. if anyone needs these in the future, please PM me. I don't have a permanent link to these, but I kind of like it that way.

http://www.yousendit.com/download/U0d6Zm1SZ1BlM1R2Wmc9PQ



Thank you! Excellent series!

Posted about 3 years ago

Jimbo McJohnson

Avatar for Jimbo McJohnson

13 posts
Joined 06/2009

Does anyone have a link to the spreadsheets? The link posted above has expired.

Posted almost 3 years ago

cubaner

Avatar for cubaner

161 posts
Joined 07/2009

shaggy

Avatar for shaggy

193 posts
Joined 10/2009

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

http://www.yousendit.com/download/Z01OeVdxa0QrV3hFQlE9PQ

if i don't respond right away, feel free to PM me. that goes for anyone. i remember a couple of the people above doing that, so i guess i don't need to keep saying this Smile

Posted over 2 years ago

svrs007

Avatar for svrs007

1 posts
Joined 11/2009

the link has expired again.. Frown

It would be great if you can get a DC admin to upload to DC server. Smile

Posted over 2 years ago

sthief09

Avatar for sthief09

1297 posts
Joined 07/2007

the link has expired again.. Frown

It would be great if you can get a DC admin to upload to DC server. Smile



I like to do it individually. For fastest response, anyone can feel free to PM me. Sorry it's been a couple of days. Had a very long trip home from Australia.


https://www.yousendit.com/download/S1VEeEVhZy84aU5MWEE9PQ

Posted over 2 years ago

cath555

Avatar for cath555

2 posts
Joined 02/2010



HomePoker Videos → Professor Plotkin → Episode Six