Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by shuttle (Micro/Small Stakes)

Nice vid, but actually looking forward to the next episode where you are going to talk about 4bets being called and 4bet pots.
I believe that one of the standard counteradjustment to a (wide) depolarized 3bet is to 4bet bluff and flat the dominating hands, but at the micros I really often see the people who 3bet depolarized ranges are willing to flat 4bets in and out of position (probably because they just cant fold a strong hand and don't believe my 4bet).

As for your exercises, opponent1 is not profitable to 4bet and opponent2 is profitable to 4bet (just simple math).
The last example I guess K2s is better, b/c K2s doesn't block villain's bluffs (don't think I even need to calculate). I actually made a thread on "negative" blocking effect which is what you called "blocking the bluffs" in your vid, but only one person seemed interested Guess everyone knows this stuff!

I believe that one of the standard counteradjustment to a (wide) depolarized 3bet is to 4bet bluff and flat the dominating hands, but at the micros I really often see the people who 3bet depolarized ranges are willing to flat 4bets in and out of position (probably because they just cant fold a strong hand and don't believe my 4bet).

Flatting strong hands vs players with high 3bet% depolarized ranges who cbet too much is a good adjustment. I think you always need to have good reads and a plan to be able to flat 3bets vs players, especially when out of position.

However consider the following opponent:
3bets too much, 3bets deploarized, doesn't fold to 4bets that much.
Vs this opponent I think it is better to 4bet nut hands because you will "cooler" a large amount of their range and get a lot of money in ahead. You can get a lot of money in good both pre and postflop here as opposed to just preflop.

To put it simply, if you have a good hand and your opponent is not going to fold then you can valuebet.

These sort of adjustments will be the topic of a future video.

Exercice 1
Against opponent 1
3bet combos = 120 / 5bet combos=56
-> Ev(4-bet bluff)=-2.53bb

Against opponent 2
3bet combos = 198/ 5bet combos=70
-> Ev(4-bet bluff)=1.60 bb
*********************************
Exercice 2
without blockers: 216 3-bet combos / 56 5-bet combos
with A2: 162 3-bet combos / 45 5-bet combos => EV(4-bet bluff)=4.36bb
with K2: 205 3-bet combos / 49 5-bet combos => EV(4-bet bluff)=5.78bb

amirite?