Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by bosoxx34 (Micro/Small Stakes)

Time Link to 00:27:50

I know you said you probably could have done better opening a narrower range. That said, are we better off mucking the 56o pre? We're rarely going to flop well enough to value bet, most of the time we're going to be checking back 6 high or 3rd pair a lot.

Time Link to 00:30:29

In a spot like this, where a guy like this makes a polarising bet and we know he doesn't bluff much at all, isn't his range going to be weighted far more in favour of value hands than bluffs?
Especially when the turn and river complete most draws and we're only getting ~2:1 on a call I imagine (results oriented) that calling here's going to be pretty -EV.

(I guess the same concept you were talking about with respect to his 3 barrelling range a few hands later)

Nice video! Enjoyed it greatly.

I know you said you probably could have done better opening a narrower range. That said, are we better off mucking the 56o pre? We're rarely going to flop well enough to value bet, most of the time we're going to be checking back 6 high or 3rd pair a lot.

Yeah this is right on the edge, we're probably better off mucking. Like you mentioned and I said in the video, I didn't do a really good job of making that adjustment this session.

In a spot like this, where a guy like this makes a polarising bet and we know he doesn't bluff much at all, isn't his range going to be weighted far more in favour of value hands than bluffs?
Especially when the turn and river complete most draws and we're only getting ~2:1 on a call I imagine (results oriented) that calling here's going to be pretty -EV.

(I guess the same concept you were talking about with respect to his 3 barrelling range a few hands later)

Yeah I agree with everything you said here, however this was the first time I've seen him make a bet like that on the river in >1k hands and really wanted to know what he was doing it with.

Cheers for responses, video was solid - seeing play vs guys like this is probably more relevant to a 100hu player than seeing sick Q high hero calls anyway.

Time Link to 00:26:00

How is the experiment with betting rivers smaller going in general?

Time Link to 00:27:58

You said it wasn't a great cbet on the right, but (and maybe this doesn't apply to this guy specifically) versus opponents who don't fold to many cbets, I do find that it's the case that we can still "one and done" ace-high flops pretty often. Does that seem flawed in your experience?

I liked the video, but I already mentioned that I thought videos like this filled an important niche. I will probably rewatch this later this week.

How is the experiment with betting rivers smaller going in general?

So far I've pretty much noticed no difference.

You said it wasn't a great cbet on the right, but (and maybe this doesn't apply to this guy specifically) versus opponents who don't fold to many cbets, I do find that it's the case that we can still "one and done" ace-high flops pretty often. Does that seem flawed in your experience?

No, that's a good point and one I neglected to make. It just seemed against this particular opponent he wasn't folding to cbets regardless which is why I made the statement.

But yeah A high flops are great to c-bet against these types of opponents simply because they can't call with their overs.

Time Link to 00:08:26

When the straight is on the board on the river, and you overbet almost twice the pot, what do you do if he shoves there? Or had you completely taken out any 9x hands in his range?

When the straight is on the board on the river, and you overbet almost twice the pot, what do you do if he shoves there? Or had you completely taken out any 9x hands in his range?

I'm folding and kicking myself if he shoves. An overbet bluff on this board isn't working enough about this type of opponent.

I really like this video. It is 100x more useful for me to see how you play against non-regs. In previous episodes you said that making a video against non-regs is boring. To me it's not boring at all, it really helps my game. I often have a problem that I become very spewy after playing a lot and not watching any videos. A video like this helps me to go back in the zone. Also, I think that it shouldn't be boring to you either, becouse I saw that you often disagree with your plays. Until that happens there is no reson to be bored IMO.

Btw, nice series.

I really like this video. It is 100x more useful for me to see how you play against non-regs. In previous episodes you said that making a video against non-regs is boring. To me it's not boring at all, it really helps my game. I often have a problem that I become very spewy after playing a lot and not watching any videos. A video like this helps me to go back in the zone. Also, I think that it shouldn't be boring to you either, becouse I saw that you often disagree with your plays. Until that happens there is no reson to be bored IMO.

Btw, nice series.

I may have mispoke, playing non-regs isn't boring for me but figured it may be boring for you guys since solid ABC poker can beat them 99% of the time. However after reading the comments over the last few videos i realize this isn't the case. I'll continue to mix it up for the rest of the series since playing non-regs seems to have a lot of educational value.