wow its not on party

anyone having problems with video around 8-9 minutes? it starts fastforwarding like crazy.

Me too.

Problems with Fastforwarding/etc are just MP4 version, right?

I'm updating the MP4/Flash version right now -- looks like something went wrong in the transcoding/conversion of it. WMV seems to work fine from what I can tell, please confirm if you get a chance. Conversion should be done in about 45min.

Rob

I have the fast forwarding problem in the flash version and the wmv download doesn't work either (get an error message during the download).

I have the fast forwarding problem in the flash version and the wmv download doesn't work either (get an error message during the download).

Flash version has been re-uploaded and works fine (I'm watching it now FTW).

Rob

Oink,
Excellent as always.

1) I use PT's filters to make a default starting hand charts,
I actually go so far as to have slightly different charts for different limits.
This way I am confident in playing hands I have a history of profit with.
Should I discard this idea altogether?

2) Are you gifted mentally?
I notice you are able to do combo calculations in your head,
and some time ago I asked you about hand ranges, and you seem to have them memorized.
is this something a mere mortal like myself can do?
is it important, etc?

3) When I watch you or DD play. I am always amazed at your optimism in villains range.
by that I mean, I see folds when you see easy peel/calls etc.
My question seems obscure but, how can I see things more optimistically as to not fold so much?

We miss you at the forums! Transform all of us into megalags!

Heh, that kramer27 (or whatever) dude is spot-on example of a player that has a lowish aggression factor (0.7), but against whom you just cannot fold anything made. I can imagine completely sensibly people advising (well at least used to be advising) folding top pair against this guy's raises, because "OMG his AF is 0.7". His VPIP is high, for sure, which makes the AF a bit skewed anyhow, but even then most of his actions don't make any sense at all.

But he's just the type to cap with 45o preflop and just go crazy in general. There was this wonderful hand (at around 39 minutes) where he had A8o on QQ4r board and he went call/3-bet on the flop which is about the strongest line you can take and makes the least sense with the hand he had. :-)

06:15 Hero has Ah Qc in CO.
Player reads, SB unknown, HJ big fish. Read on HJ obtained from previous hand where he called an UTG open raise pf in the CO with K6 o/s.

Pre flop
HJ limps, hero raises, both blinds call.

Flop
Jc 8d 2s
Checked to hero who bets, all three opponents call.

Turn
Jc 8d 2s Qh
Again checked to hero who bets, SB raises, BB folds, HJ calls two cold and hero calls.

River
Jc 8d 2s Qh Kh
SB bets, HJ calls, hero folds.

Is it a big mistake to over call here. The HJ is a big fish and can easily have a hand that hero beats. I doubt that the SB has T9 because I think he would have bet out on the turn with that holding, rather than risk having his nut hand checked through. He could easily have two pair, but are there some hands he could play like this that hero is beating, well how about, QT, Q9, 98 do you think those holdings are possible.

Oink, any chance of another eight part series in the future? I've gotten so much out of My Danish Luckbox and now this. I think these type of vids that make you think outside the box are very educational. The Doughnutz vids have this same quality.

The Doughnutz vids have this same quality.

sry, but lol. I really can´t watch his videos, he doesnt explain it in the right way. And after i saw his videos i just played like a little maniac. Oink is so much better as coach.

Hey Oink good work!

Just two thing on the hands in the end you went trough in pokertracker.

About the JT hand, it felt a bit optimistic to cound AK and AQ for the full 16combos, he may bet them but as the board is now bad for him I feel he is as likely or more to chk. More likely he bets KQ then as a bluff. Also if we raise he may acctually fold some of the weaker hands with a nonzero probability. Just that 40/20 calc felt a bit optimistic?

On the 99 hand. At the point we had been raising alot of hands in a row. And even though the stats indicated he would have a very narrow range I feel like we had to widen it more becouse of our image at the point. Also if thats the case he will want to get a showdown vs us so a c/r bet down for value would be my prefered line. But I agree with u if we give him the tight range or we dont think he is adjusting even though we have been raising alot of hands in a row.