Episode Three

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Episode Three

sthief09 reviews a video submission from mksteal, focusing on trapping your opponents and playing your draws.

tags: sthief09 video review $200nl 4-tabling trapping

This Series: King For a Day Part Deux

It’s back by popularity for a second season! Ever wonder what it would be like to have an Executive Producer review your play? Stop wondering. sthief09 lets you sit on the throne for a day as he analyzes member videos.

Previous Video: Episode Two | Next Video: Episode Four

Subscribe to Subscribe to this series Subscribe to this series



Comments for Episode Three

volition
Deuce High
45 posts
Joined 06/08

Nice video Josh, I found your comments and suggestions on the plays to make to be pretty informative

Posted Jul 19, 2008 5:24am

nakke
Deuce High
46 posts
Joined 04/08

re: only buying in enough to cover fish

Interesting idea. That might also make it seem like you're in for your whole bankroll to the other regs/tags, that is if you buy in for something like 86.4 bb.

Posted Jul 19, 2008 7:48pm

egraul
Deuce High
20 posts
Joined 04/08

re: only buying in enough to cover fish

Interesting idea. That might also make it seem like you're in for your whole bankroll to the other regs/tags, that is if you buy in for something like 86.4 bb.




I also thought this was an interesting idea, it would probably help with reducing varience when you get into cooler situations vs other tags. I also think that if you are adjusting your buyin at each table you would really have to think about the players you're going after and that might make you more aware of where your money should be comming from. In turn making you play better.

Nice vid!

Posted Jul 22, 2008 6:58pm

Paracelse
Deuce High
18 posts
Joined 03/08

At 39.30 on the river AA 7856J you advocate check/calling ?
I think if we check we should fold, because he will check back all hand with showdown value so we only beat a random flush draw on the flop which don't catch a pair, and this is not even sure he will bet those whereas he will bet 100% of his straight.
So for me c/f>c/c. I'd like hear your thoughts about that.

Posted Jul 30, 2008 3:46am