Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Joe Tall (Micro/Small Stakes)

Nice Video

6:05 both Joe & bosox were surprised that casper folded the turn w/ a backdoor NFD + BP + A overcard deep. Bosox, you said that if you were 100bb deep, you would lean toward a fold even though casper had 9 flush + 5 2 pair outs [you discounted the A as 2 pair outs]. Can you explain why this is a standard call deep but not a clear cut/snap call on the turn 100bb deep?

I know there are better implied odds w/ a deeper stack, but I would snap call that turn w/ so much equity w/ 100bb because (I would tell myself): (1) most of my outs are hidden & I will get paid off if i hit on the river; (2) it will be difficult for villain to put us on a FD (let alone backdoor NFD)that are implied odds are goot; and (3) dry flop + 2 barrels on flop & turn from villain means that villain most likely has a TP hand that may get stubborn on the river.

6:05 both Joe & bosox were surprised that casper folded the turn w/ a backdoor NFD + BP + A overcard deep. Bosox, you said that if you were 100bb deep, you would lean toward a fold even though casper had 9 flush + 5 2 pair outs [you discounted the A as 2 pair outs]. Can you explain why this is a standard call deep but not a clear cut/snap call on the turn 100bb deep?

I know there are better implied odds w/ a deeper stack, but I would snap call that turn w/ so much equity w/ 100bb because (I would tell myself): (1) most of my outs are hidden & I will get paid off if i hit on the river; (2) it will be difficult for villain to put us on a FD (let alone backdoor NFD)that are implied odds are goot; and (3) dry flop + 2 barrels on flop & turn from villain means that villain most likely has a TP hand that may get stubborn on the river.

Yeah I tend to agree. In my videos I think out loud a lot and some things may sound weird and this one was of them. I listened to it 2 or 3 times just to make sure. I completely agree with your analysis, and I can't really add anything to it. Nice job.

Thanks,
Mike