Poker Video: Pot-Limit Omaha by DJ Sensei (High Stakes)

Mad Potters: Episode Five

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Mad Potters: Episode Five by DJ Sensei, riverboatking

DJ Sensei and RBK mix in a little cap action to their PLO series, discussing the differences in action and adjustments you should make in capped games.

About Mad Potters Subscribe to

DJ Sensei gets a top of the line coach as he sits with riverboatking to learn mid and high stakes PLO. Watch the live play of each player with dual-audio and watch them dive deep into equity calculations as they prop-bet on the results! The Mad Potters show you how to take the next step to dominating PLO games with their unique styles of play.

Tags

dj sensei riverboatking cap plo $25/50 omaha $5kplo 6-max 2-tabling live play

Video Details

  • Game: plo
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 50 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Mad Potters: Episode Five

action_jp

Avatar for action_jp

1395 posts
Joined 02/2008

Excellent video.. btw this cap game business looks like it'll involve even more variance than the regular kind of PLO, is that right?

Also DJ & RBK need to set up some sort of a travelling stand-up routine...

Posted almost 4 years ago

rusty trombone

Avatar for rusty trombone

102 posts
Joined 01/2008

haha the cap games are awesome. stay outta my fish pond, donks.

Posted almost 4 years ago

Meleren

Avatar for Meleren

1 posts
Joined 02/2008

Great video guys. One of my favourite series. Funny, teaching ect. Keep up the good work.

Posted almost 4 years ago

Jeff W

Avatar for Jeff W

45 posts
Joined 01/2008

At 15:50, we totally have 6 clean outs!

Also, at 19:22 I think you guys overestimate the equity you had(with cards face up). You actually only had 30%.

Posted almost 4 years ago

sonarym

Avatar for sonarym

18 posts
Joined 11/2007

Also DJ & RBK need to set up some sort of a travelling stand-up routine...



+1

Posted almost 4 years ago

violtu

Avatar for violtu

120 posts
Joined 07/2008

Can you explain why do you preffer one gapers over no gapers?
No gapers have better equity than one gapers at least vs hands like aces and kings?
Also why do you preffer gap at the upper side, like 4568 over 3567? Isnt you make straights with bigger redraws more often with a gap at the lower end?

Posted almost 4 years ago

DJ Sensei

Avatar for DJ Sensei

3025 posts
Joined 10/2007

Can you explain why do you preffer one gapers over no gapers?
No gapers have better equity than one gapers at least vs hands like aces and kings?
Also why do you preffer gap at the upper side, like 4568 over 3567? Isnt you make straights with bigger redraws more often with a gap at the lower end?



Well with one gappers you have a card to root for on the flop! Heh I'm not sure actually if one is superior to the other, but both are very playable and in omaha there are rarely situations where your hand being a one-gapper versus a no-gapper will make a difference.

As far as where the gap goes, you definitely want it on the lower end of your hand's range (8764 > 8754 > 8654) so you can make more nut straights. I dunno if we said otherwise in the video, but thats the truf.

Posted almost 4 years ago

ZwerG_Orca

Avatar for ZwerG_Orca

74 posts
Joined 07/2008

Im pretty sure violtu is right about this. Hands with no gaps are way better than one gappers (not saying they are bad or anything). With One gappers especially if the gap is on the high side you have often problems that many of your drawing cards arent to the nuts. Thus I think it does make a big differnce, that is if you play somewhat deepstacked. In capped PLO I agree it doesnt matter much because you get it in anyway with any sort of wrap. However the commentarys in the video might be a bit misleading especially for beginners, because someone who didnt know before will think a hand like 9765 is better than 9876 in general which is just plain wrong.

Posted over 3 years ago



HomePoker Videos → Mad Potters → Episode Five