Im not your buddy, guy!

This is madness.

Fantastic video - I'm surprised at how weaktight these players are at 1000PLO.. would you say that this is pretty par for the course for these stakes?

Also, Dan runs on permanent GodMode in this video. :D

funny and informative stuff - enjoyed it very much!

Yes the videos are entertaining, but I don't think they are every informative.

Many of your preflop decisions are really bad. For example, raising Ah4h7s3c first to act 5 handed is really bad.

I have a question about the A Q J 9 hand. Why do you think shoving is more profitable than just calling? We have a slight edge (52-55%) vs most run hands that are in svenns range, but we are only 31% in the main pot vs AA** and a run hand like svenns.

I did some quick math, we have to commit 260 extra dollars to the main pot with 31% equity vs AA and a run. (260 * 3) * .31 = 241.8 expectation. so we lose 18 dollars in the main pot. We commit 856 to the side pot with 53% equity. (856 * 2) * .53 = 907. we make 51 dollars in the side pot. 51-18 = net gain of 33 dollars. So shoving is profitable, but is obviously high variance. Let me know if I made a math error.

We are getting 3.3-1 to call and see the flop with relative position. Does anyone know how to compute our expectation for this situation? It seems considerably much more complicated. My intuition (whatever thats worth in omaha) tells me that it will be lower variance as we will often have a greater edge when we commit the rest of our stack post flop.

This commentary is hilarious. More dual commentary videos please!

great jorbe guys, liked it very much

"58J nothing" :)

Awesome video.

I have a question about the A Q J 9 hand. Why do you think shoving is more profitable than just calling? We have a slight edge (52-55%) vs most run hands that are in svenns range, but we are only 31% in the main pot vs AA** and a run hand like svenns.

I did some quick math, we have to commit 260 extra dollars to the main pot with 31% equity vs AA and a run. (260 * 3) * .31 = 241.8 expectation. so we lose 18 dollars in the main pot. We commit 856 to the side pot with 53% equity. (856 * 2) * .53 = 907. we make 51 dollars in the side pot. 51-18 = net gain of 33 dollars. So shoving is profitable, but is obviously high variance. Let me know if I made a math error.

We are getting 3.3-1 to call and see the flop with relative position. Does anyone know how to compute our expectation for this situation? It seems considerably much more complicated. My intuition (whatever thats worth in omaha) tells me that it will be lower variance as we will often have a greater edge when we commit the rest of our stack post flop.

I think the best reason to just call preflop is that we can see a flop and decide whether to commit the rest of our stack. Obviously we only need to hit a little piece of it to continue since the pot will be so big and we have all these live cards, but the times it comes down 654r we can bail out. It kinda sucks to have to lay down our hand with that much money already in the pot, but so it goes.

I haven't done any math on this situation, but I think it would be tough to do since our equity varies so much from flop to flop, but I think it makes sense to be able to do that.

I had this great idea while watching this video. With all the talk about prop-betting, it came to me, and this certainly isn't an orginal idea, that poker sites should implement prop-betting inside the software. What would be more comforting than to get money from the prop-bet on a all flop when you have red aces in your hand! And in any place, a nice way to keep the games exciting. Any Full Tilt executives out there, are you hearing me?

great vid, very funny