MickeyWins
1555 posts
Joined 07/2007
the read on commandermubray(close but wrong), I dont get it.
You both agreed he should be called down on the hand
we had QQ board was K77xx.
Can you explain how you got that read?
seems to me he was playing straight forward vs you DD.
he is a 20/10 who 3 bets the UG+1 player(us).
Isnt his range very small like TT+ AK AQs, with the K on flop making things even worse?
I think I could have found a fold here, course I am too weak tight...lol.
is our decision made on the flop, barring a ace?
I was just confused by this hand and the read of this player.
its full ring not 6 max, the hands get stronger.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
JacksonTran
48 posts
Joined 02/2008
I remember playing CommanderMcBrag when I used to mulitable them games on stars before the doomswitch was flipped on me. Seriously, pokerstars is a big fat joke. Anyways, McBrag is like a 12-tabling solid TAG. He never,ever,ever,ever has less than a K here.
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
DeathDonkey
5229 posts
Joined 11/2006
Hey Mickey,
I thought a bit to come up with a good explanation but its pretty damn close and in retrospect I don't hate folding. If we give him TT+, AK then its pretty close if we think he'll really bet all those on every street, but I think its a fine call down. I'm quite sure Chuck and I both felt people tend to do silly things on paired boards and that was affecting our read. We were not all that certain of his straightforwardness or solidness at this point, though with the additional info of later sessions and things you guys mention here it might have been a clear cut fold, narrowing his range to basically KK, AA, AK, which is possibly for some people when they give action on this flop.
-DeathDonkey
Posted about 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote