Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by jk3a (Mid Stakes)

Ghost: Jk3a (#10) - Exploitable Part 2

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Ghost: Jk3a (#10) - Exploitable Part 2 by jk3a

Jk3a continues to explore the exploitable and un-exploitable play at $2/4 NLHE and how it affects the play of his opponents.

About Ghost Subscribe to

Ghost the best of DeucesCracked in the shorthanded games they play in today.

Tags

jk3a ghost hh review hand replayer ipod friendly

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 50 minutes long
  • Posted almost 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Ghost: Jk3a (#10) - Exploitable Part 2

Icehockeyplyr

Avatar for Icehockeyplyr

279 posts
Joined 08/2009

You know your addicted to DC video content when your in before the downloads are even ready!

Posted about 2 years ago

nihil251

Avatar for nihil251

28 posts
Joined 01/2009

Time Link to 00:17:51

given the fishy stats i prefer making a bet he can both call with worse pairs and bluff raise with missed draws (even though fish don't do that too often on the river). it probably takes some math to show whether bet small/call or ck/call is best, but i think there are really a lot of worse pairs that can call compared to only a moderate amount of draws that get to the river. so i think i like betting ~$60 here.

edit: shoving or betting big might be best.

Posted about 2 years ago

Skleice

Avatar for Skleice

14 posts
Joined 06/2008

Any thought to shoving the K2s hand @ the 8:00 min mark if his range is mostly draws and pot controlled Kx? Since your hand looks so much like a 9x here, I'd think he can bet/fold a K and save you from being value-towned. Or did you prefer the call just cuz draws/floats are a bigger part of his range than Kx?

Posted about 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

given the fishy stats i prefer making a bet he can both call with worse pairs and bluff raise with missed draws (even though fish don't do that too often on the river). it probably takes some math to show whether bet small/call or ck/call is best, but i think there are really a lot of worse pairs that can call compared to only a moderate amount of draws that get to the river. so i think i like betting ~$60 here.

edit: shoving or betting big might be best.



there are def lots of combos of worse pairs but a 31/8 also loves his suited cards as well. Both plays obv have merit and I couldn't really fault either.

Posted about 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

Any thought to shoving the K2s hand @ the 8:00 min mark if his range is mostly draws and pot controlled Kx? Since your hand looks so much like a 9x here, I'd think he can bet/fold a K and save you from being value-towned. Or did you prefer the call just cuz draws/floats are a bigger part of his range than Kx?



you say floats, but remember that we checked the flop. so air/draws are a big enough portion of our range that I don't think turning our hand into a bluff better or necessary.

Posted about 2 years ago

GooberCMYK

Avatar for GooberCMYK

3 posts
Joined 02/2010

chomp

Avatar for chomp

145 posts
Joined 03/2008

Jared, your recent vids have been really top drawer. Good job.

Posted about 2 years ago

halvadron

Avatar for halvadron

255 posts
Joined 06/2009

Googolplexx

Avatar for Googolplexx

6 posts
Joined 11/2009

sick vid. the hand analysis was second to none, as per usual.

Posted about 2 years ago

halvadron

Avatar for halvadron

255 posts
Joined 06/2009

god, your vids are some awesome. Sick work PLS MOAR

Posted about 2 years ago

DiggerTheDog

Avatar for DiggerTheDog

697 posts
Joined 09/2008

Sneakers

Avatar for Sneakers

1904 posts
Joined 09/2009

Time Link to 00:40:33

Why didn't we shove the rest of the stack ($78)? Were we afraid of a 78 for a straight?

I'm curious, because we called off most of our stack. Why not make him pay completely?

Posted about 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

Why didn't we shove the rest of the stack ($78)? Were we afraid of a 78 for a straight?

I'm curious, because we called off most of our stack. Why not make him pay completely?



we have a bluffcatcher against too much of his c/r range to make 3betting +ev

Posted about 2 years ago

Sneakers

Avatar for Sneakers

1904 posts
Joined 09/2009

we have a bluffcatcher against too much of his c/r range to make 3betting +ev


This is how I would have played it (I'm sure). I always just call the river, and accept whatever winnings are there. I was thinking I have a leak, being "safer than sorry".

Is the +EV equation really important at this point? We called off a huge amount of our stack. What is $78 more? Either you have it or you don't. Close your eyes and get all in (I'm thinking..or maybe I'm leaking).

Sorry for my persistence with this. I'm just trying to get my mindset correct on this.

Thanks. Really do enjoy these videos.

Posted about 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

This is how I would have played it (I'm sure). I always just call the river, and accept whatever winnings are there. I was thinking I have a leak, being "safer than sorry".

Is the +EV equation really important at this point? We called off a huge amount of our stack. What is $78 more? Either you have it or you don't. Close your eyes and get all in (I'm thinking..or maybe I'm leaking).

Sorry for my persistence with this. I'm just trying to get my mindset correct on this.

Thanks. Really do enjoy these videos.



yes, it matters, ALOT. the ev involved is identical to making a thin value bet. we need to get called by worse >50% for the 3bet to be profitable. it's very unlikely that will happen

Posted about 2 years ago

Pokerfarm

Avatar for Pokerfarm

60 posts
Joined 04/2009

48/40, Is that really your 6 max stats? I know you play a lot of HU. Are there possibly some HU hands in there that have diluted your stats. I can't imagine those stats being profitable at 6-max. Am I wrong?

Posted about 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

48/40, Is that really your 6 max stats? I know you play a lot of HU. Are there possibly some HU hands in there that have diluted your stats. I can't imagine those stats being profitable at 6-max. Am I wrong?



mix of hu and 6max, mostly hu

Posted about 2 years ago

rohan68

Avatar for rohan68

480 posts
Joined 12/2008

Time Link to 00:34:24

why not 2 barrel (we have lot of equity)
why not raise his weak bet ,you says he's got weak hands + we got a lot of equity....if we don't improve river it seems a wast of equity and fold equity

Posted about 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

why not 2 barrel (we have lot of equity)
why not raise his weak bet ,you says he's got weak hands + we got a lot of equity....if we don't improve river it seems a wast of equity and fold equity



i think betting turn is better than what i did

Posted about 2 years ago

Delirious Bacon

Avatar for Delirious Bacon

84 posts
Joined 10/2010

Awesome video, that analysis was very clear and decent. Good job. Would like to see some more vids

Posted over 1 year ago



HomePoker Videos → Ghost → Jk3a (#10) - Exploitable Part 2