Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by DOGISHEAD (High Stakes)

first

first

Doesn't matter, both of today's videos don't work.

hyachahcshxchachachacahch cmon guys

such cruelty !

and on the sabbath too

lol serious question

team isreal doesnt play on sundays? that would be pretty cruel lol

lol serious question

team isreal doesnt play on sundays? that would be pretty cruel lol

Lol no, Their Sabbath is from sundown friday till sundown saturday - so they've probably been playing all night ;p

wowowoow epic vidoes today, cant wait to watch!

I can't download this video, I keep getting this error (and on whitelime's too):

This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.

oh, lord. after about 4 weeks a new non-railbird NL HU Vid and it does not work...

Hey Guys, all just relax a bit, they will get it up when the boys wake up. It's 7AM, and I just sent Rob a text, I'll call him in the next 30 mins (not sure how happy his wife will be with that...) Anyway, USA vs China, men's basketball is about to start, so just chill out and watch that for a bit!

i sold my TV to get money i can loose at HU NL

i sold my TV to get money i can loose at HU NL

Baller TV or microNL ?

i sold my TV to get money i can loose at HU NL

i played u, your good

i played u, your good

what did you spend his money on ?

best vids of the week ...I can't waiiiiiiiiiit ZOMG

Hey guys,

Sorry for the delay in getting these videos up. I wish there was something I could do about it, but I'm afraid that I'm just as powerless as the lot of you.

Also, once the video gets up I'd appreciate if you guys could offer some comments as to what you thought of the format and whether you want to see the rest of this video sequence (this video was about 1/3 of the complete match). I'll admit that regrettably this video wasn't an excellent showcase of this format because I wasn't very good at integrating my friend SweetCow into a lot of the analysis, as this is my first time doing this, but I hope you guys will still be able to appreciate and learn from what we made.

Edit: I have received update that DeathDonkey has gotten to his computer and so hopefully this problem will be resolved soon.

Ok, the videos are working now.

Sorry guys, looks like we've got some bugs in our new code that need to be fixed. I've logged the bugs (fortunately for me, unfortunately for you, didn't have my phone next to me last night) and we'll make sure it doesn't happen again -- the filenames had characters in them that Amazon S3 apparently doesn't like (parenthesis).

Rob

Hey guys,

I hope you enjoyed the video. Dogishead and I weren't so sure how to make a video with this specific format. At first you'll notice that it was mainly him that discussed hands, but throughout the video the interaction between us improved. It was very hard for me to chime in when dogishead explained each hand with such detail, but occasionally I found spots in which he didn't mention something that was on my mind. It's a very strange format and we would love to hear your thoughts about it.

Sincerely,
SweetCow

Another amazing Dogishead video. I learn something new everytime I watch one

THE DOG

So, 9 minutes in and you played 2 hands and talked 7 min about why u bet 66 on K7xK board. Please dont let this be a similar epic fail as the menlo DC vid. *resumes*

U ROCk

I think the added point of view of a not similiar skilled player really improves the educational aspect of the video. A concept that in my opinion already worked well at series like Late night Coaching (or King of the Day).
So I hope, we will be able to see more of the session...

Great video, but you should really calm down a little bit...
Take some time to breath in, or you'll be risking death due to lack of oxygen if the video exceeds 70 mins

I really enjoyed the video, and I definitely would be interested in seeing more of this match.

I think the commentary of whether or not to call a river shove with 97o was pretty interesting. While you are saying that it is a terrible spot for him to bluff, if you're going to fold everything but a flush on that board, and you'll be raising a 7 there pretty much always, wouldn't it be a great spot since there are either more, or equal 7x hands than flushes? Add in the (few, few) times that you are bluffing there, and he could possibly get the 50% fold equity needed in order to make that play profitable.

Obviously he doesn't know that you're going to fold a 7 there and he'd have to risk 50bb or so to find out. Given that he was so passive, it's a clear fold for you. With that said though, at what point do you give your opponent credence for thinking on the next "level" so to speak? What would you need to see from your opponent in order to make a call there. Other than having a tendency to spew, that is.

sweet vid, though if you want to do vids together it would be more interesting to see a session from sweetcow where dogishead asks questions, instead of the other way around, simply because sweetcow didn't really add to the discussion imo

ya, def release the rest of the match plz and not too late if possible so we still have a feel for the match or w/e

Your friend asking the questions was really helpful. His questions were pitched at just the right level, getting you to explain some of the fundamentals. Good job.

Hey dogishead, in the T9o hand where we flat the flop and ship the turn, if we are villain with the KT are you generally folding to hero's turn raise? Or shipping it as villain played it.

I really enjoyed the video, and I definitely would be interested in seeing more of this match.

I think the commentary of whether or not to call a river shove with 97o was pretty interesting. While you are saying that it is a terrible spot for him to bluff, if you're going to fold everything but a flush on that board, and you'll be raising a 7 there pretty much always, wouldn't it be a great spot since there are either more, or equal 7x hands than flushes? Add in the (few, few) times that you are bluffing there, and he could possibly get the 50% fold equity needed in order to make that play profitable.

Obviously he doesn't know that you're going to fold a 7 there and he'd have to risk 50bb or so to find out. Given that he was so passive, it's a clear fold for you. With that said though, at what point do you give your opponent credence for thinking on the next "level" so to speak? What would you need to see from your opponent in order to make a call there. Other than having a tendency to spew, that is.

I think c/r'ing just the one card straight in that spot is terrible. The reason to c/r is because you hope he bets the 7 and then cant fold against a c/r. He isn't going to bet/call worse. So since you're only c/r'ing when you have his straight beat the probability of you having a flush that is never folding is high, or you must be a total sicko to has air here a ton.

I liked it - it's actually one of the best video's i've watched...however, i'd rather see you focus on fewer concepts...for example, this first video could be about developing reads, and outline a process for doing that.

i understood what you guys were saying, but it was too much for me to really digest in just an hour...i think most ppl watching haven't thought through this stuff nearly as much as you guys have. DC seems to be pioneering "concept" videos, and i'd love to see more of that style, instead of seeing a session and discussing every random situation.

DOGISHEAD,

I really liked your previous videos. I prefer HU videos and I think yours were both entertaining and informative. However, I didn't like this one. I don't think sweetcow added much to the discussion and it didn't have much flow. I got pretty stressed out just watching it. I seem to be the only on that feels this way, but I rather see the next part without sweetcow.

/Setcho

DOGISHEAD commentary is pretty much the nuts. I think Sweetcow realized this and took a backseat approach that I appreciated. Usually dual commentary sucks because the other guy feels compelled to talk even when he doesn't have much to say. But Sweetcow was mostly asking for elaboration on concepts that Dog takes for granted, so I liked the format and would be interested in seeing the rest of this match done in a similar manner.

One question: early in the video Dog raises with 83ss from the small blind. Flop is J98 rainbow, he checks behind on flop because he can't withstand a checkraise. Turn is a rag, Villian bets, Dog instasnapfolds because he 'obviously can't call a bet on that board.' Would you mind explaining your logic here? Sometimes I feel compelled to call here after showing weakness on the flop. Thanks....

I think that all of your videos are sick. I did like this format as well because, like pkmurphys said, he did ask for some more detail on some concepts. Like murphy said, duel commentary often sucks because one person is on such a higher level than the other person, but since you commentary is the nuts, i like how sweetcow kinda sat back and ask questions every now an then. Keep em coming

Excellent enjoyed this one a lot. more plz!

Awesome - get the next one up asap

really like DOGISHEAD videos great format solid vid well done!

88 hand was sick - i liked vid, format, commentary its all top notch.

23:12 - KQQK2 board & villain donk bets river for abt 2/3 psb. your analysis is that J hi is no good & earlier you said that villain was playing fit or fold so you give him a stronger range of hands on flop. however, villain could also have a counterfeited pair (bluff) or A hi (for value?)

my question: if you had an A in that hand, how often would you call the river vs this type of fit or fold villain...esp early in the match b-4 you know how much abt their river betting range?

Haha, I totally forgot to reply to any of these comments. I'll go ahead and reply to this one since I feel a little guilty.

23:12 - KQQK2 board & villain donk bets river for abt 2/3 psb. your analysis is that J hi is no good & earlier you said that villain was playing fit or fold so you give him a stronger range of hands on flop. however, villain could also have a counterfeited pair (bluff) or A hi (for value?)

my question: if you had an A in that hand, how often would you call the river vs this type of fit or fold villain...esp early in the match b-4 you know how much abt their river betting range?

To be honest, I'd probably call almost always but it could quite easily be a -EV call over teh window of this hand. Splitting sometimes and of course being able to discount a few of his ace highs helps, but also at this point in the match calling for information is quite valuable. Knowing whether or not he can 1) valuebet a bluff, 2) slowplay a queen here, or 3) bluff a semi-obvious hand (33, etc.) is pretty valuable information that could net me more EV in the future if I gain some information now.

Superb video, keep them coming!

One question: During the hand 28 minutes in on the right hand table, you open T9cc and call his 3bet. Flop comes As8c5c so you have the flush draw. He continuation bets and you call. He then proceeds to check the turn 3h and the 9s river. When you find out afterwards that he has AQ here you say that he was getting far too fancy and should be betting all 3 streets into you rather than trying to check-raise the turn and checking the river to get you to bet busted draws. However the way he played it is identical to how I would have played it given the draws on the board. I would have gone for a check-raise on the turn because if I bet the turn and you call, you will have so many bluff outs on the river. Given the draws on the board, I won't know where I am.

This line to protect against bluff outs was preached heavily by Foucault of 2+2 in his videos and I always thought it had great merit. What can you tell me in response to this? I'm really confused now and would like clarification as to the best line (although I guess both can be used).

Many thanks.