Poker Video: MTT/SNG by bones (Mid Stakes)

Time Link to 00:22:11

what would be wrong with c/r with the A10? If you are bet calling then you are getting it in one way or another so why not give him a chance to bluff?

Time Link to 00:44:53

Im not sure how much he had been raising at the 50/100 lvl but his btn raise is 61%. You said something about your 3-bet shoving range being 77+ but wouldn't it be profitable to be shoving all PP's if he is still 3xing and raising 61% of hands? With you both at around starting stacks he cant call it off that wide and I think you get enough folds from shoving to more than make up for the times that he has you dominated with another PP. Also that might loosen his calling range up a bit so when you do have a good hand he will be more likely to call you with a QJs hand or something like that.

what would be wrong with c/r with the A10? If you are bet calling then you are getting it in one way or another so why not give him a chance to bluff?

I didn't mean to imply that I would c/f if I checked. If I had like 725 behind, I'd c/f before I c/r. I think checking is bad because you give him the option of taking a free card, which is pretty disastrous vs. a hand that could have 6+ outs when the pot is this big compared to your stack. I think that is a greater concern than inducing bluffs which still have tons of equity vs your hand.

Im not sure how much he had been raising at the 50/100 lvl but his btn raise is 61%. You said something about your 3-bet shoving range being 77+ but wouldn't it be profitable to be shoving all PP's if he is still 3xing and raising 61% of hands? With you both at around starting stacks he cant call it off that wide and I think you get enough folds from shoving to more than make up for the times that he has you dominated with another PP. Also that might loosen his calling range up a bit so when you do have a good hand he will be more likely to call you with a QJs hand or something like that.

Yeah all pairs are prob profitable jams in this spot. I would add in some Axs stuff if I felt like his range had widened sufficiently. As for loosening up his calling range, the wider my jamming range gets (especially when adding pairs and Ax), the less I want him calling with QJs so I don't think I'd view that as a benefit.

Time Link to 00:47:21

I remember hearing something about this feature for the HUD, but I don't think they ever implemented it. This appears to be the UserVoice entry, but it's pretty unloved. Maybe we can go saturate it (except that I already used my 10 votes).

We should also all go post in the Calling All Tournament Regs thread; tourneys appear to be a major point of emphasis for their development in early 2010.

From the official blog:

We do have plans to add more HUD filters for stack size and a few other HUD filters so that’s already a done deal.

So now we know.

Time Link to 00:30:45

Do you ever donk lead on flops like this with overpairs?

Or is the board to wet here to play oop comfortably?

Time Link to 00:24:22

Shouldn't this be a pretty standard jam with A4o?