Time Link to 00:11:57
if he plays fit or fold, why not cbet about 50% pot or even less, don't see his calling range change that much.
FenderJaguar prepares to move to high stakes as he and KRANTZ finish off the last hour of their review of FenderJaguar's play at 4 tables of mid-stakes 6max NLHE.
Get a look inside KRANTZ's coaching program. How do you take a mid-stakes grinder and turn him into a high stakes juggernaut? Watch FenderJaguar's poker world get turned upside down.
Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.
Time Link to 00:11:57
if he plays fit or fold, why not cbet about 50% pot or even less, don't see his calling range change that much.
Is it wrong that I get excited every time I see a new NTMTO vid come up?
I gotta say that this series has turned into a big favorite of mine. Prob cuz the games are directly relevant and the talk/analysis is great. Fender is a great candidate for this series cuz he backs up his play with solid logic, but is also obv open for criticism...better than when the student just nods along with everything the coach says.
I hope u guys keep these coming....looking forward to NL1k.
Time Link to 00:18:11
If the river doesn't give us a pair, would betting be better since we could fold out his missed A-hi FD's?
If the river doesn't give us a pair, would betting be better since we could fold out his missed A-hi FD's?
Yes if the river was a brick house we would definitely be bluffing.
Hi,
I would like to know which chips u use on FT? Something from tiltbuster or sth else? Thanks for your help.
Hi,
I would like to know which chips u use on FT? Something from tiltbuster or sth else? Thanks for your help.
the wsop 2009 tiltbuster chips.
actually I got another question
. Did you change the bet amounts to bold letters somehow or do u have a very big flatscreen.
actually I got another question. Did you change the bet amounts to bold letters somehow or do u have a very big flatscreen.
edited the xml file ![]()
could u maybe send me the file, I wanna have that too, small betsizes suck ![]()
Skype: bastian.meinig
would be really nice ![]()
could u maybe send me the file, I wanna have that too, small betsizes suck
Skype: bastian.meinig
would be really nice
2p2 has all the info in the ftp mods thread, just search for XML within the thread. you're gold.
Time Link to 00:05:15
when he bets what ever it was 1/6 pot with trip aces on the river, what are you calling that you have beat. I understand that you don't want to get bluffed but you really don't have anything, isn't he betting the perfect amount to get you to call, extracting value from you.
Thing is he can call the river and expect to be beat 4 out of 5 times and it's still +ev. It's close between a call and fold but I agree with the analysis in the video and I think most people would agree with hating life and clicking call.
Time Link to 00:06:54
Reason a) is a good reason to not put ourselves in this situation, but it is not a good reason to actually go ahead and call.
Time Link to 00:20:42
With the QJs on table 1, if we think we might move him off weak hands by bombing the turn & river, is there a better line we could take such as check turn/overbet river or other unorthodox bet-sizing such as pot+ on turn/underbet river, that might get more value for our legitimate range? I am aware that there are balance issues with this, but versus a 50/12 we aren't concerned about that.
Time Link to 00:29:37
AQ on table 4 looks like a possible turn call for me and you don't even mention it.
With the QJs on table 1, if we think we might move him off weak hands by bombing the turn & river, is there a better line we could take such as check turn/overbet river or other unorthodox bet-sizing such as pot+ on turn/underbet river, that might get more value for our legitimate range? I am aware that there are balance issues with this, but versus a 50/12 we aren't concerned about that.
I'd start with just betting 3/4 pot on the turn and then see how the river shakes out. If he's a real drooler, then I'd overbet the river, if it's unclear I'd just bet 3/4 pot again and see what he calls with.
AQ on table 4 looks like a possible turn call for me and you don't even mention it.
you're a station. :-p
Is it wrong that I get excited every time I see a new NTMTO vid come up?
No, you should run to the bell tower, ring that mother and let the whole town know. Shout it far and wide!!!
Maybe we should get FenderJaguar action figures made...
No, you should run to the bell tower, ring that mother and let the whole town know. Shout it far and wide!!!
Maybe we should get FenderJaguar action figures made...
As long as I can get accessories and the Kung Fu Grip imo!
you're a station. :-p
In a good or bad way, though?
Time Link to 00:14:28
What are your thoughts about the betsize on the 4b oop here with AKs?
You make it the same size as in position?
I feel that people really likes to call 4bets if they are in postion when we makes it this small, do we don't mind that or what? It's definately a lot harder to play 4b pots oop then in ip imo.
A bigger betsize would make villain more likely to jam or fold. However it would be more more expensive for us to 4b bluff. Can't decide which is better ![]()
I guess a smaller size like this is better when villain's 4b range is very polarized? Would you make it the same size on CO vs a LAG on the BTN?
What are your thoughts about the betsize on the 4b oop here with AKs?
You make it the same size as in position?
I feel that people really likes to call 4bets if they are in postion when we makes it this small, do we don't mind that or what? It's definately a lot harder to play 4b pots oop then in ip imo.
A bigger betsize would make villain more likely to jam or fold. However it would be more more expensive for us to 4b bluff. Can't decide which is better
I guess a smaller size like this is better when villain's 4b range is very polarized? Would you make it the same size on CO vs a LAG on the BTN?
I think a guy that's playing so tight is usually jamming or folding when I 4b so I don't think I need to bomb it or anything. That may be different vs. a different guy or if we had deeper stacks. If you expect your specific opponent to flat a lot of 4b's, then yeah 4b bigger and less often as a bluff.
As for your 2nd question, depends on the LAG and how he responds to 4b's. I wouldn't start increasing my 4b size unless I had a reason to.
The intro to the video is brutal, but the rest is great. It's just like watching entourage.
Home → Poker Videos → Never Tell Me the Odds → Episode Twelve