Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by tubasteve (Mid Stakes)

Tubasteve Reviews Snider's Play

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Tubasteve Reviews Snider's Play by tubasteve

Tubasteve reviews a 200NL two-tabling video by DeucesCracked member 'Snider' focusing on playing OOP and representing hands.

Tags

tubasteve snider 200nlhe 6max hand reading playing oop

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 45 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Tubasteve Reviews Snider's Play

Magaca

Avatar for Magaca

186 posts
Joined 01/2008

Good to see more lowstakes 6max content, only been King for a Day this week.

Can't wait to see it, thanks.

Posted about 4 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

Hey everyone! I think this video came out really well so I hope you all enjoy it; please feel free to ask questions and provide criticism as always.

As promised in the vid, the original commentary can be found here: http://search3.idrive.com/driveway/jsp/dway_download.jsp?id=d0h7q4b5h9

Also around 11 min in, I'm not really sure what I was talking about with leading the K turn in the blind battle. I guess c/c lead is an OK bluff line, but I think flop is either a b/f or c/f.



Aaaaaand upon scanning through the video I've noticed it doesn't quite sync up...my voice comes about 10-15 seconds before the action starting around 12-15 min in or so. We'll get to work fixing it for you guys!

Posted about 4 years ago

kondor101

Avatar for kondor101

929 posts
Joined 02/2008

You fitted a ton of stuff in here tubasteve, is it going to be a season?

I really like the whole "two tables review of someone's play". Four tables is ok but sometimes I just think that there is almost so much action with four that the action takes over from the commentary. One table might not be a bit hit and miss in that it will either make a great video for commentary or there will be almost nothing to comment on.

Posted about 4 years ago

yeahgoforit

Avatar for yeahgoforit

53 posts
Joined 03/2008

I really enjoy this sessions review, keep it up!

Posted about 4 years ago

yeahgoforit

Avatar for yeahgoforit

53 posts
Joined 03/2008

I just think you should pause it sometimes so you can explain yourself better, not rushing because thare is another hand running.

Posted about 4 years ago

lewkiz

Avatar for lewkiz

92 posts
Joined 01/2008

This was a great video, good work!

What is the overall game plan when you call with SC? IP? OOP?

You mentioned that if you call with SC oop you should be very apt to check-raise the flop, what kind of boards do you want? Is it better to check-raise A/K dry, T97ss or 953? How big should you make the raise? What is a good frequency, is it better to c/r to often or to seldom?

In position I guess the plan is to make money by good implied odds so you want opponent's with tight opening ranges to call with SC? Then I guess you want some kind of hand to continue on the flop, do you rather call/float or raise if you hit a FD/TP/MP/GS on the flop? [Or are you looking for even bigger flops?]

Posted about 4 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

I just think you should pause it sometimes so you can explain yourself better, not rushing because thare is another hand running.



i tried. when the better-synced version is posted this will be more apparent and will be in better spots.

Posted about 4 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

7100 posts
Joined 11/2006

i tried. when the better-synced version is posted this will be more apparent and will be in better spots.



Better synced version is posted, btw.

Posted about 4 years ago

snider

Avatar for snider

16 posts
Joined 01/2008

my avatar isnt brian may, its acutally an old picture of Sylvester Stallone.

Really want to thank you and Deucescracked for getting this done. I think this is an amazing way to create a video. Tubasteve did an excellent job and I will nitpick this video for many days.

I agree with the JT hand, it jsut felt so dirty and weak playing it oop and check/calling trying to hit a hand.

Very interesting to get a different perspective throughout the whole video.


Thanks again,

Billy Snider aka sniderstyle

Posted about 4 years ago

sweetysven

Avatar for sweetysven

157 posts
Joined 03/2008

my avatar isnt brian may, its acutally an old picture of Sylvester Stallone.

Really want to thank you and Deucescracked for getting this done. I think this is an amazing way to create a video. Tubasteve did an excellent job and I will nitpick this video for many days.

I agree with the JT hand, it jsut felt so dirty and weak playing it oop and check/calling trying to hit a hand.

Very interesting to get a different perspective throughout the whole video.


Thanks again,

Billy Snider aka sniderstyle



Wow Sylvester Stalone was such a sexy stud!

Great video! Lots of usefull information and didn´t even finish it yet. Awesome!

Posted about 4 years ago

ybother

Avatar for ybother

239 posts
Joined 01/2008

I watched the original with sniders comments which were interesting too (atleast for this microgrinder looking up a couple levels). Maybe you two should do a review session live, some point counter point with Tubasteve would be a plus.

Posted about 4 years ago

SlimboKarvell

Avatar for SlimboKarvell

213 posts
Joined 01/2008

Some things I don't like in this video. Most importantly you seem to miss the action quite often! This is somewhat frustrating because then you base your analysis on wrong facts. Also it should be possible to 2 table without overlap. Apart from that an ok video!

Posted about 4 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

Some things I don't like in this video. Most importantly you seem to miss the action quite often! This is somewhat frustrating because then you base your analysis on wrong facts. Also it should be possible to 2 table without overlap. Apart from that an ok video!



Thanks for this comment, I realize that the hands overlap a bit and I missed some action, but I have rewatched the video and it wouldn't have affected any serious decisions we made in the video IIRC. This was my first session review vid and I think I know how to make the next one a lot better. Smile

Posted about 4 years ago

SlimboKarvell

Avatar for SlimboKarvell

213 posts
Joined 01/2008

Thanks for this comment, I realize that the hands overlap a bit and I missed some action, but I have rewatched the video and it wouldn't have affected any serious decisions we made in the video IIRC. This was my first session review vid and I think I know how to make the next one a lot better. Smile



That's why I made the comment, looking forward to the next vid!

Posted about 4 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

slimbo: can you point out some of the spots where misreading the action may have changed my thoughts on a hand? if so i'll be happy to address it.

Posted about 4 years ago

eastern motors

Avatar for eastern motors

16 posts
Joined 03/2008

DC should do a poll of members to figure out what stakes we actually play. I think a lot of people are more interested in seeing 50NL-200NL than seeing a 20th 5/10 or 10/20 video. I mean how many member here actually play those stakes?

Posted about 4 years ago

Wayne Lively

Avatar for Wayne Lively

581 posts
Joined 05/2007

I strongly suggest not doing videos where the tables overlap. Very difficult to watch with all the flipping back and forth. It really hurts the continuity.

Posted about 4 years ago

DonMB

Avatar for DonMB

2 posts
Joined 05/2008

12:00 right table:
I would rather bet the TT ip for free showdown - if we check and he donks the river, do we call any bet?

Posted about 4 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

I strongly suggest not doing videos where the tables overlap. Very difficult to watch with all the flipping back and forth. It really hurts the continuity.



Yea, its obviously not our SOP, this was originally a member video posted in our forum that I thought would make a good DC video.

Posted about 4 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

DC should do a poll of members to figure out what stakes we actually play. I think a lot of people are more interested in seeing 50NL-200NL than seeing a 20th 5/10 or 10/20 video. I mean how many member here actually play those stakes?



Don't worry, your job's your credit! What more do you need? (lol eastern motors commercials)

Seriously though, I should have more content comin out pretty soon so stay tuned!

Posted about 4 years ago

tubasteve

Avatar for tubasteve

7697 posts
Joined 11/2007

12:00 right table:
I would rather bet the TT ip for free showdown - if we check and he donks the river, do we call any bet?



This is a big reason why we don't bet the flop. Then we have to check turn and have a difficult river decision if he bets; by checking the flop we exercise pot control and let him bluff, plus we get more information based on his turn action.

When IP, you can generally slow down a lot more with marginal hands without the risk of getting outplayed as badly as when OOP.

It's also worth noting that jpsnow is a decent reg, so against that type of player you won't get much action from worse hands on Kxx when he is OOP. He'll probably call one street with his pairs, so you can get a flop bet out of them, but unless he's really good, your flop check may induce bluffs on later streets, making a check overall our best option to get value. I say unless he's really good because a really solid reg will often realize your range is somewhat polarized to stuff with showdown value such as a midpair or complete air.

Posted about 4 years ago



HomePoker Videos → Tubasteve Reviews Snider's Play