Poker Video: Misc/Other by Joe Tall (High Stakes)

Thoroughbred: Joe Tall plays 500/1K HORSE Part One

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Thoroughbred: Joe Tall plays 500/1K HORSE Part One by Joe Tall

Our own Joe Tall puts his skill set to the test as he plays nosebleed stakes with some of the best players in the world. Watch him analyze his play and their play with equity calcs in all the games in this two part video.

Tags

joetall joe tall high stakes horse limit omaha omaha8 stud stud8 hi/low matusow dagastino ipod friendly

Video Details

  • Game: other
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 54 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Thoroughbred: Joe Tall plays 500/1K HORSE Part One

thac

Avatar for thac

154 posts
Joined 01/2008

wow, 2 parts? can't wait to watch this!

Posted about 4 years ago

Raist0000

Avatar for Raist0000

168 posts
Joined 07/2007

Wow looking forward to see this probably awesome video.

Before looking at the video i'm interested in some things. I thought you didn't play that high. It was only for making the video or you play that stakes now? or taking a shot? do you plan to play in that games again?

Thanks (I really hope there is more series about horse games!)

Posted about 4 years ago

bottomset

Avatar for bottomset

168 posts
Joined 02/2007

very good video, boo on the spoilers

Posted about 4 years ago

kyotoisok

Avatar for kyotoisok

41 posts
Joined 01/2008

this is awesome

anyone have the math behind the two x's showing makes it more likely that one of them has another x? did i repeat that right?

Posted about 4 years ago

eastern motors

Avatar for eastern motors

16 posts
Joined 03/2008

Very entertaining video.

Where is the BBV hand? Is there a reason that FTP scrambles the cards in stud games?

Posted about 4 years ago

blumpster

Avatar for blumpster

156 posts
Joined 01/2007

Is there a reason that FTP scrambles the cards in stud games?



The reason is to simulate what it's like in a live game, where at showdown a player can turn over his hand without revealing which of the 3 down cards was the river card. So, on FTP the cards are shuffled in the sense that there is a 1 in 3 chance of each of the 3 down cards being displayed as the "river" card. Contrary to what viewers might think Joe was saying, this does not mean: if card X is shown as the river card, then X is NOT the river. Instead, it just means there is no way to know 100% which down card was the river card (although hand reading can usually give you an idea which was the more likely holding).

Posted about 4 years ago

blumpster

Avatar for blumpster

156 posts
Joined 01/2007

anyone have the math behind the two x's showing makes it more likely that one of them has another x? did i repeat that right?



1. Given one player with K door, what is the probability he has split kings?

This is [1 - (48/51)(47/50)], which is approximately 11.5%.

2. Given two players with K doors, what is the probability at least one of them has split kings?

This is [1 - (48/50)(47/49)(46/48)(45/47)] = [1 - (207/245)], which is approximately 15%.

However, when you take 3 players with the same door card, the probability at least one of them has that split pair now becomes less than case 1 above.

Posted about 4 years ago

SiCKa

Avatar for SiCKa

40 posts
Joined 02/2008

woah this is really high stakes , it'd be scary to play that kind of dough lol

Posted about 4 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6642 posts
Joined 11/2006

Wow looking forward to see this probably awesome video.

Before looking at the video i'm interested in some things. I thought you didn't play that high. It was only for making the video or you play that stakes now? or taking a shot? do you plan to play in that games again?

Thanks (I really hope there is more series about horse games!)



I have played a few times since and made another 50m video where I have to do the audio. It's a good game and selling off my action to get in it has been totally worth it (as you'll see whenever we get that next video up).

Posted about 4 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6642 posts
Joined 11/2006

1. Given one player with K door, what is the probability he has split kings?

This is [1 - (48/51)(47/50)], which is approximately 11.5%.

2. Given two players with K doors, what is the probability at least one of them has split kings?

This is [1 - (48/50)(47/49)(46/48)(45/47)] = [1 - (207/245)], which is approximately 15%.

However, when you take 3 players with the same door card, the probability at least one of them has that split pair now becomes less than case 1 above.



Nothing like having a UCLA math graduate TA on you side...

Holla to Blump, thanks!

Posted about 4 years ago

TeeJayOrTj

Avatar for TeeJayOrTj

6 posts
Joined 02/2007

Joe...in that first holdem hand were you not going to defend A4o? It looked like you were ready to fold before the sb called. I mean im a fish and all but I defend that with or without the SB calling.

Posted about 4 years ago

Raist0000

Avatar for Raist0000

168 posts
Joined 07/2007

Hi, i have a couple of questions!

-In 36:30 you say that in Omaha8, the stealing range is very wide and can be any 4 cards. It's typical to steal very very wide? What % of the hands do you think you usually try to steal in CO or BU? I know it depends on the big blind tightness, but I would like to know more or less what do you think about stealing ranges.

-In 47:30, playing stud hi, you open (Kh6h)3h UTG and a Td reraises you. You catch Kc on 4th street and you checkraise against a Td8h board. I would like to know what would you do if, instead of catching Kc on fourth, you catch:
1) Ah
2) 2h
3) 6c
4) 3c
5) Ac

Thank you very much for this great video!

Posted about 4 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6642 posts
Joined 11/2006

Very entertaining video.

Where is the BBV hand? Is there a reason that FTP scrambles the cards in stud games?



You find the recent hand I played and put in BBV here: http://joetall.com/blog/. FTP shuffles the hole cards to mimic what could happen in a live game. Players get that card down and have the freedom to shuffle them.

Posted about 4 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6642 posts
Joined 11/2006

Joe...in that first holdem hand were you not going to defend A4o? It looked like you were ready to fold before the sb called. I mean im a fish and all but I defend that with or without the SB calling.



It's a clear fold with the SB calling and I'm going to say without a strong read vs an EMP raise, it's a fold there as well. Vs a steal range, I call for sure.

Posted about 4 years ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6642 posts
Joined 11/2006

Hi, i have a couple of questions!

-In 36:30 you say that in Omaha8, the stealing range is very wide and can be any 4 cards. It's typical to steal very very wide? What % of the hands do you think you usually try to steal in CO or BU? I know it depends on the big blind tightness, but I would like to know more or less what do you think about stealing ranges.



This really depends on the game conditions but when a new game at high stakes forms, you'll find the aggro players in LP testing the ranges of the blinds by pounding on them.


-In 47:30, playing stud hi, you open (Kh6h)3h UTG and a Td reraises you. You catch Kc on 4th street and you checkraise against a Td8h board. I would like to know what would you do if, instead of catching Kc on fourth, you catch:
1) Ah
2) 2h
3) 6c
4) 3c
5) Ac



1) Ah - bet
2) 2h - call
3) 6c - I was prepared to c/r and stick to my "over represent" plan.
4) 3c - same as a 6, imo
5) Ac - I might bet as it will make my hand easier to play if I catch well on 5th (my bet on 4th increases my FE later on), plus the chances I get raised on 4th are really slim, Dags has to have a big hand to raise there.

Posted about 4 years ago

*TT*

Avatar for *TT*

582 posts
Joined 01/2007

AA9sxs O8 hand - AAxx or A234, 2 low pair or a set were more likely with that flop when he raised, I'm actually kind of shocked that he played Jxxx that way because your hand screams of the same range I placed him on after the flop like A234 or AAxx - he is splitting or behind every time. Therefore I don't 3-ball, keep the pot size controlled or you will be forced to pay off an extra bet on the river if the pot gets bloated on the next street (of course this is what happened but this is not results oriented).

On the turn thats an check-call or bet fold - both lines are fine if you feel the opponent is very agro (I don't think you did) but based on your read IIRC the best line would be bet-fold. He is never raising here without a monster.

O8b is probably my weakest limit game, I hope some others can add feedback about this hand; I reserve the right to be wrong.

Posted about 4 years ago

DeathDonkey

Avatar for DeathDonkey

5229 posts
Joined 11/2006

Just wanted to chime in to say Joe folding A4o vs an EP raiser is 100% standard no matter how many people call. Reverse implied odds up the wazoooo!!

-DeathDonkey

Posted about 4 years ago

Moshmopok

Avatar for Moshmopok

87 posts
Joined 01/2008

Regarding the QQ vs. KJ hand: Why did you think he couldn't bet the river with a better hand? Did I understand this right? I'm totally clueless there. Smile

Posted about 4 years ago



HomePoker Videos → Thoroughbred: Joe Tall plays 500/1K HORSE Part One