Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by jk3a (Mid Stakes)

Ghost: jk3a (#2)

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Ghost: jk3a (#2) by jk3a

Jk3a continues his previous ghost video playing 200NL on 4-tables. Listen as he walks us through his thought processes and learn what goes through his head.

About Ghost Subscribe to

Ghost the best of DeucesCracked in the shorthanded games they play in today.

Tags

jk3a ghost $1/2 nlhe 6max 4-tabling video review

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 48 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Ghost: jk3a (#2)

Alexandre

Avatar for Alexandre

114 posts
Joined 08/2008

I watched jk3a's first ghost session this friday, perfect timing! Grin

Posted over 3 years ago

caderousse

Avatar for caderousse

60 posts
Joined 01/2008

evan

Avatar for evan

17 posts
Joined 06/2008

1/2 is midstakes now? sweet, i'm a midstakes player!

Posted over 3 years ago

Joliq

Avatar for Joliq

377 posts
Joined 01/2008

Enjoyed this, some good discussion of ranges etc. keep up the good work!

Posted over 3 years ago

mchristo

Avatar for mchristo

2 posts
Joined 10/2008

thanks ghost, I am getting used to the concept of actually paying attention to board textures, this was really helpful. Also enjoyed the overbetting discussion in the As2s hand. If you can put your opponent on a flush specifically there, do you think it is okay to just shove that river or is the slight overbet the most profitable play there?

Posted over 3 years ago

chomp

Avatar for chomp

145 posts
Joined 03/2008

Very solid. Like the unfussy, gentle style of play.

Posted over 3 years ago

sh1p the ch1ps

Avatar for sh1p the ch1ps

20 posts
Joined 07/2008

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

thanks ghost, I am getting used to the concept of actually paying attention to board textures, this was really helpful. Also enjoyed the overbetting discussion in the As2s hand. If you can put your opponent on a flush specifically there, do you think it is okay to just shove that river or is the slight overbet the most profitable play there?



While I think he can have a flush, I don't think it's enough of his range to justify a shove with those stacks.

Posted over 3 years ago

Hielko

Avatar for Hielko

4402 posts
Joined 07/2008

1/2 is midstakes now? sweet, i'm a midstakes player!


Pokerstars thinks that it's midstakes, it's under the midstakes tab. But personally I think 1/2 is still small stakes, 2/4-5/10 is midstakes.

Posted over 3 years ago

alexhandros

Avatar for alexhandros

86 posts
Joined 01/2008

When you have KQ and just call his $20 bet on the river, I think that is a clear spot to CRAI. You have to ask yourself if he's ever betting so small with a big hand. If he had a 3 or something he would undoubtedly just shove. It really doesn't make sense for him to have you beat, so once you check you should just put him in and hope he calls with his ten, or his weak king, thinking YOU are trying a desparation bluff

Posted over 3 years ago

mogwai316

Avatar for mogwai316

719 posts
Joined 07/2008

Around the 26-minute mark, DeepMindz raises utg and you call from the bb with 33, and it gets checked down. You are super deep with him here, like 365 bb's. Should you be more likely to stab at that pot on the turn and/or river, since he is a thinking player and will be wary of getting too involved with those stacks? If he had a big hand I don't think he would've checked the flop behind because you can't afford to miss a street of value when you're that deep. I might be way off though, just a thought I had when I was watching the hand.

Posted over 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

When you have KQ and just call his $20 bet on the river, I think that is a clear spot to CRAI. You have to ask yourself if he's ever betting so small with a big hand. If he had a 3 or something he would undoubtedly just shove. It really doesn't make sense for him to have you beat, so once you check you should just put him in and hope he calls with his ten, or his weak king, thinking YOU are trying a desparation bluff



I think crai there is fine. I tend to think it's not clear because we don't have reads but in general I would agree that he's calling anything he's vbetting there that's worse.

Posted over 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

Around the 26-minute mark, DeepMindz raises utg and you call from the bb with 33, and it gets checked down. You are super deep with him here, like 365 bb's. Should you be more likely to stab at that pot on the turn and/or river, since he is a thinking player and will be wary of getting too involved with those stacks? If he had a big hand I don't think he would've checked the flop behind because you can't afford to miss a street of value when you're that deep. I might be way off though, just a thought I had when I was watching the hand.



I wouldn't think the stacks there should affect our bluffing frequency since we don't have the ability to really use any of the depth unless we overbet huge Smile I just don't think there's much need to bet there since we have the best hand quite often.

Posted over 3 years ago

novles

Avatar for novles

4 posts
Joined 01/2008

jk3a,

I heard you are a professional live shortstacker. Confirm/deny?

Posted over 3 years ago

Asgrow13

Avatar for Asgrow13

12 posts
Joined 01/2008

Nice vid. Someone get this man a series.

Posted over 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

jk3a,

I heard you are a professional live shortstacker. Confirm/deny?



That might come true today Smile Glad you enjoyed the vid.

Posted over 3 years ago

ohjoy

Avatar for ohjoy

432 posts
Joined 07/2008

Around ~18 minutes, you play that KQ pot vs. the swedish juiceball. You check the river to him, which I definitely approve. However, when he bets $20, shouldn't this be a shove almost always? Considering that you crush his range and he is so committed, isn't it reasonable to think that he might call worse hands considering he's getting a gazillion-1 if you shove?

When I look at the hand, the river leaves me thinking you're missing a ton of value. He has like $60 behind, and the pot will be like ~$260 if you shove. That gives him like 4,5-1 pot odds or something, and he might come up with some dumb excuse to call. You say you assume he is a live one, and those people will make up excuses to call.

Do you agree?

Posted over 3 years ago

Eusebio

Avatar for Eusebio

4 posts
Joined 08/2009

At the 29:30 mark when you are SQing w/ 96s:

Isn't this a bad spot to do so since the overcalling is running at 52/0 w/ a very low fold to cbet % (over just 25 hands but still..) and only has 50BB left..?!
Even though we do have position on him, I just expect a player like this to call SQs very light and then possibly fold to way to little cbets which most of the time leaves us in an awkward spot w/ 96s with weird stacksizes left.

Posted over 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

At the 29:30 mark when you are SQing w/ 96s:

Isn't this a bad spot to do so since the overcalling is running at 52/0 w/ a very low fold to cbet % (over just 25 hands but still..) and only has 50BB left..?!
Even though we do have position on him, I just expect a player like this to call SQs very light and then possibly fold to way to little cbets which most of the time leaves us in an awkward spot w/ 96s with weird stacksizes left.



could you find the hand again, I don't see it at that time?

Posted over 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

Around ~18 minutes, you play that KQ pot vs. the swedish juiceball. You check the river to him, which I definitely approve. However, when he bets $20, shouldn't this be a shove almost always? Considering that you crush his range and he is so committed, isn't it reasonable to think that he might call worse hands considering he's getting a gazillion-1 if you shove?

When I look at the hand, the river leaves me thinking you're missing a ton of value. He has like $60 behind, and the pot will be like ~$260 if you shove. That gives him like 4,5-1 pot odds or something, and he might come up with some dumb excuse to call. You say you assume he is a live one, and those people will make up excuses to call.

Do you agree?




I do think c/r there would be better than what I did.

Posted over 2 years ago

MergingRanges

Avatar for MergingRanges

116 posts
Joined 11/2009

Time Link to 00:00:00

Hi jk3a, great video, if the river was a 9 of spades, or a 2 of spades would you think it would be too thin to value bet the river with your KQ?

-Thanks.

Posted over 2 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

Coach
903 posts
Joined 01/2008

Hi jk3a, great video, if the river was a 9 of spades, or a 2 of spades would you think it would be too thin to value bet the river with your KQ?

-Thanks.



need a diff timelink?

Posted over 2 years ago

MergingRanges

Avatar for MergingRanges

116 posts
Joined 11/2009

need a diff timelink?



oh, the timelink didn't work, I'm sorry,the video and try to time link it for you when I get a chance. Thanks.

Posted over 2 years ago



HomePoker Videos → Ghost → jk3a (#2)