whitelime (#2)

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

whitelime (#2)

In his second Ghost, whitelime 2-tables the $3/6 games on FTP and sheds a bit of light on how to navigate more difficult games.

tags: whitelime ghost 2 tables 3/6 nl hold'em tough games

This Series: Ghost

Ghost the best of DeucesCracked in the shorthanded games they play in today.

Previous Video: whitelime (#1) | Next Video: mdm13 (#2)

Subscribe to Subscribe to this series Subscribe to this series



Comments for whitelime (#2)

damanrico
Deuce High
23 posts
Joined 05/08

Yay, another whitelime video.
First of all, aren't you playing a bit too loose? You keep trying to 3/4-bet people while you're running at 44/40 stats with marginal to very bad hands. I know you made the comment that because you're deep it's not all that bad, and that you want to get into interesting spots for the video, but how interesting are those spots for us when most of us don't 3/4-bet light while running at 44/40? Maybe it's better to play a bit tighter, but still loose (30/26, etc) so the spots you get in are more interesting, since a lot of the members get into these spots themselves when they play.

On to a specific hand, at around minute 37:00 you say you do call his minraise with A10/AJ of spades and only continue when you hit. Could you explain this concept a little further? Is it profitable enough to do so, and what if you only hit a 10 or a J, making you third pair, will you still continue (and probably stack off cause the opponent is so short) with the hand?

Overall I enjoyed the video and can't wait for more.

Posted Aug 17, 2008 1:26pm

Azraettii
Deuce High
18 posts
Joined 06/08

Nice video, wouldnt it be fun playing 44/40 and be huge winner. 24/20 is pretty boring at times.

Posted Aug 17, 2008 5:03pm

fnx99
Deuce High
18 posts
Joined 05/08

Yay, another whitelime video.
First of all, aren't you playing a bit too loose? You keep trying to 3/4-bet people while you're running at 44/40 stats with marginal to very bad hands. I know you made the comment that because you're deep it's not all that bad, and that you want to get into interesting spots for the video, but how interesting are those spots for us when most of us don't 3/4-bet light while running at 44/40? Maybe it's better to play a bit tighter, but still loose (30/26, etc) so the spots you get in are more interesting, since a lot of the members get into these spots themselves when they play.

yeah this

Posted Aug 17, 2008 7:07pm

Nielsio
Deuce High
5 posts
Joined 01/08

Nice 1-outer on the right hand side of the screenshot

Posted Aug 17, 2008 8:06pm

reXne
Deuce High
4 posts
Joined 01/08

Really enjoy watching whitelime playing. Good one.

Posted Aug 17, 2008 10:14pm

whitelime
Exec Producer
Pair of Deuces
153 posts
Joined 01/08

Yay, another whitelime video.
First of all, aren't you playing a bit too loose? You keep trying to 3/4-bet people while you're running at 44/40 stats with marginal to very bad hands. I know you made the comment that because you're deep it's not all that bad, and that you want to get into interesting spots for the video, but how interesting are those spots for us when most of us don't 3/4-bet light while running at 44/40? Maybe it's better to play a bit tighter, but still loose (30/26, etc) so the spots you get in are more interesting, since a lot of the members get into these spots themselves when they play.

On to a specific hand, at around minute 37:00 you say you do call his minraise with A10/AJ of spades and only continue when you hit. Could you explain this concept a little further? Is it profitable enough to do so, and what if you only hit a 10 or a J, making you third pair, will you still continue (and probably stack off cause the opponent is so short) with the hand?

Overall I enjoyed the video and can't wait for more.



I'm pretty sure you can win playing 44/40 at these deep tables. I also don't think I run THAT loose. Probably just picked up some more 59s type hands instead of the J5o crap. I'd say something like 37/30 is more about what I'd play. Furthermore, I think I only play ever so slightly looser in these videos than I would actually play if I wasn't recording. For the future, I'll try to point those spots out where I would otherwise take the tight route but I end up taking the looser less +EV one for the purposes of the video.

What's the HH at 37:00? I'm on a computer that can't view the video right now...

Posted Aug 17, 2008 11:18pm

damanrico
Deuce High
23 posts
Joined 05/08


What's the HH at 37:00? I'm on a computer that can't view the video right now...



You open A9 of spades UTG 4-handed, so basicly from the CO.
SB calls with a $213 starting stack.
Flop is Qc6hKs.
SB checks, you cbet $34 in $46, he minraises you pretty quick to $68, you fold.

Posted Aug 17, 2008 11:47pm

Losingdonkey
Deuce High
14 posts
Joined 04/08

simple question, are you opening pot from every position because its deep or as a default ?
just can't recall from previous vids if you opened to 3x or pot usually, thanks

Posted Aug 18, 2008 12:13am

Losingdonkey
Deuce High
14 posts
Joined 04/08

also another thing i've been thinking about / struggling with is that if we're 3betting a very wide range and constantly applying pressure on others, how much does it change our felting range preflop, after we've 3bet someone a ton and he finally 4bets us and we have like TT or something similar do we automatically assume that he is finally taking a stand and still felt or just let it go thinking he finally picked something up (which in a nutshell i guess means that should we adjust our ranges for getting it in preflop according to our own 3betting and 4betting frequencies or to the hands that we see villain showdown in similar spots?)
I am probably explaining this really poorly but i hope you understand and can give me some thoughts, thanks

Posted Aug 18, 2008 12:56am

bombjack
Deuce High
6 posts
Joined 06/08

Hi Emil
You clearly have a very loose 3-betting range pre-flop. Just wondering whether you find this is profitable per se, or whether it contributes more in metagame, i.e. creating an image and getting you paid off with your real hands?

I suppose you could check in Poker Tracker/HM to see if these suited connectors are profitable for you. I'm sure big pairs will be much more profitable for you than for tight players.

Posted Aug 18, 2008 1:17am

5150
Deuce High
8 posts
Joined 07/08

great video.

Posted Aug 18, 2008 7:51am

vancouverspecial
Deuce High
8 posts
Joined 03/08

Hi Emil,

Quick question...

When you called the 3bet with 22 OOP, you decided to c/c the Kxx rainbow. From what I could tell you were readless other than from the few hands you'd been at the table.

I would think that the c/c with 22 isn't a profitable play unless we have the read that villain is always shutting down after making the initial c-bet. Do you feel you can c/c there because villain is often going to read you to having a King, and not bet turn or river?

I feel like once I see an opponent c/c 22 on any board in a 3bet pot, I'm going to be barelling with a ridiculous frequency.

Could you give any further thoughts on that hand please.

Thanks,
Mark

Posted Aug 18, 2008 10:28am

Sir_TiltALOT
Deuce High
1 post
Joined 08/08

Why cant I see this vid? Just stopping after 30 sec, whats the problem????

Posted Aug 18, 2008 1:43pm

whitelime
Exec Producer
Pair of Deuces
153 posts
Joined 01/08

Hi Emil
You clearly have a very loose 3-betting range pre-flop. Just wondering whether you find this is profitable per se, or whether it contributes more in metagame, i.e. creating an image and getting you paid off with your real hands?

I suppose you could check in Poker Tracker/HM to see if these suited connectors are profitable for you. I'm sure big pairs will be much more profitable for you than for tight players.



Both, but mostly metagame.

Posted Aug 18, 2008 6:28pm

whitelime
Exec Producer
Pair of Deuces
153 posts
Joined 01/08

Hi Emil,

Quick question...

When you called the 3bet with 22 OOP, you decided to c/c the Kxx rainbow. From what I could tell you were readless other than from the few hands you'd been at the table.

I would think that the c/c with 22 isn't a profitable play unless we have the read that villain is always shutting down after making the initial c-bet. Do you feel you can c/c there because villain is often going to read you to having a King, and not bet turn or river?

I feel like once I see an opponent c/c 22 on any board in a 3bet pot, I'm going to be barelling with a ridiculous frequency.

Could you give any further thoughts on that hand please.

Thanks,
Mark



Why does villain have to shut down on the turn to make it profitable? If he's firing the turn with some frequency, we can c-c again w/ some frequency...

Posted Aug 18, 2008 6:29pm

Colonel Mustard
Deuce High
12 posts
Joined 03/08

iirc he explains that the villain is firing a lot of hands that the 22 is still ahead of. AQ, AJ type hands etc. That being said, I would like a little more reasoning behind this call. I guess people are less likely to barrel once called in a 3bet pot.

Posted Aug 18, 2008 7:21pm

icehawk
Deuce High
28 posts
Joined 04/08

When you type on your keyboard it sounds like African folk music.

Posted Aug 19, 2008 2:35am

damanrico
Deuce High
23 posts
Joined 05/08

Emil, could you please respond to my question (first post in this thread, and I even posted the HH a little later in this thread)?

Posted Aug 19, 2008 8:21pm

zuutroy
Deuce High
2 posts
Joined 06/08

When you type on your keyboard it sounds like African folk music.



I wasn't the only one that thought it sounded cool then!

Emil, Just wanted to say that I think you continuation bet too much in this video. When you're playing so loose, I think you cant get away with cbetting 80%. Also just wondering what your 3bet% is at MSNL, and if you think its a huge leak to only have it at ~4%.
TY.

Posted Aug 19, 2008 8:56pm

whitelime
Exec Producer
Pair of Deuces
153 posts
Joined 01/08

You open A9 of spades UTG 4-handed, so basicly from the CO.
SB calls with a $213 starting stack.
Flop is Qc6hKs.
SB checks, you cbet $34 in $46, he minraises you pretty quick to $68, you fold.



If you hit a J or T w/ AJ/AT and he bets, I'd still fold. It's close between just folding or calling the minraise to begin with but we have a backdoor FD and a gutshot and an overcard and theres some chance the turn gets checked through. There's also a very small chance he's bluffing and A high is the best hand. It still might be -EV but folding to minraises is generally bad for metagame. I don't think you'd be making a big mistake folding or calling in that spot.

Posted Aug 20, 2008 7:16pm

whitelime
Exec Producer
Pair of Deuces
153 posts
Joined 01/08

I wasn't the only one that thought it sounded cool then!

Emil, Just wanted to say that I think you continuation bet too much in this video. When you're playing so loose, I think you cant get away with cbetting 80%. Also just wondering what your 3bet% is at MSNL, and if you think its a huge leak to only have it at ~4%.
TY.



I don't have enough hands at 6 max to get an accurate 3-bet % stat and I just recently started using HEM, but off the top of my head I'd say 4% is a bit low but I wouldn't call it a leak. It's more of a way that you can make your game even more profitable.

Posted Aug 20, 2008 7:17pm

shark_fishin
Deuce High
65 posts
Joined 03/08

love you vids whitelime

Posted Aug 20, 2008 11:20pm

audikid
Deuce High
11 posts
Joined 04/08

emil-
i understand you think this really lagish style is profitable, but how? Is this more profitable from a non-showdown winnings standpoint, or do you just expect to get your big hands double stacked more?

Posted Aug 21, 2008 9:08pm

Losingdonkey
Deuce High
14 posts
Joined 04/08

just for someone who asked about 3-bet %, i tried playing similar to what emil played in with when it came to 3betting and my 3bet % for the session was 13.6, but on another note i won like 11 buy-ins at 2/4 so i don't know : D

Posted Aug 21, 2008 9:53pm

whitelime
Exec Producer
Pair of Deuces
153 posts
Joined 01/08

emil-
i understand you think this really lagish style is profitable, but how? Is this more profitable from a non-showdown winnings standpoint, or do you just expect to get your big hands double stacked more?



Moreso the latter but against weaker opponents you can win a lot of pots without getting to showdown.

Posted Aug 25, 2008 1:43am

People_Mover
Deuce High
64 posts
Joined 03/08

im curious what u would do on various board textures when you 3 bet 66 to 75.00 then bet out 85 into 150 on the 77x flop?

Posted Aug 25, 2008 10:00pm

whitelime
Exec Producer
Pair of Deuces
153 posts
Joined 01/08

im curious what u would do on various board textures when you 3 bet 66 to 75.00 then bet out 85 into 150 on the 77x flop?



I'd bet most of them with 66 b/c it's almost always going to be a vulnerable hand. If the flop is very ugly like J98, I might give up right there.

Posted Aug 26, 2008 7:40am

tubasteve
Quad Deuces
1994 posts
Joined 11/07

I don't have enough hands at 6 max to get an accurate 3-bet % stat and I just recently started using HEM, but off the top of my head I'd say 4% is a bit low but I wouldn't call it a leak. It's more of a way that you can make your game even more profitable.



i would say its a leak at MSNL. its so low, even at micro-stakes most tags 3-bet 3-4%. you could probably throw in only pure +EV 3-bet spots based on frequencies and throw meta out the window, and get it up to 5.5 or so.

Posted Aug 26, 2008 8:50am

deuces_wild
Pair of Deuces
162 posts
Joined 07/08

I'd like to know why so many people r confused as to how a LAG player such as whitelime can win...?
Maybe because not all are loose fish and can actually read ranges and board textures...
Why dont some of u drop down a couple stakes and see if ur experience over lower staked nwbs can run them over at much higher Vpip/PFR? I've found my PT BB has increased significantly with opening my range up and playing position like a speedfreak.
On a site such as full tilt where many players are 20/18 TAGS, players such as Whitelime and MDM13 are crushing because they take advantage of the such standard tendencies which many TAG's habitually employ. These standard players are playing the same hands and lines, whilst the strong LAG is bedazzling them with flamboyance and creativity, matched with solid fundamentals and experience.

(abit of a rant but i think its nice , hopefully it fuels a HAPPY debate)

Posted Aug 26, 2008 10:09am