Poker Video: Stud/Stud 8 by blumpster (High Stakes)

Ghost: blumpster (#1) - 30/60 Stud/8

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Ghost: blumpster (#1) - 30/60 Stud/8 by blumpster

In his first DeucesCracked video, blumpster teaches the secrets of success in high stakes stud/8 games, with discussion about the importance of door cards and tight play on the early streets.

About Ghost Subscribe to

Ghost the best of DeucesCracked in the shorthanded games they play in today.

Tags

blumpster stud8 other games door cards

Video Details

  • Game: mixed
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 54 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Ghost: blumpster (#1) - 30/60 Stud/8

rusty trombone

Avatar for rusty trombone

102 posts
Joined 01/2008

im curious. how would you compare the "softness" of mid to high stakes stud and stud8 to that of todays NL holdem games of similar size?

Posted almost 4 years ago

rusty trombone

Avatar for rusty trombone

102 posts
Joined 01/2008

i like this video even tho i have never played this game before.
how important was it that you had two crappy draws for high and lo on sixth street when you made the value bet against the split 5s with 77 early on? seems like it would make that spot even better to go for thin value, especially since its a split pot game and you have a back up each way.

Posted almost 4 years ago

blumpster

Avatar for blumpster

156 posts
Joined 01/2007

im curious. how would you compare the "softness" of mid to high stakes stud and stud8 to that of todays NL holdem games of similar size?



It's tough to say in general. From my experience, nlh games are getting a little tougher these days whereas stud games are staying about the same. The problem of course is that there are tons of holdem games going and not many stud games. But personally I like to have the ability to play many games and just in the one that looks the best, or switch games if I find myself losing interest. It's also great to be able to sit in a mixed game and know that most of your opponents will have significant leaks in at least one of the games (see Joe Tall's upcoming HORSE video to see this is true even at nose bleed stakes!).

Posted almost 4 years ago

blumpster

Avatar for blumpster

156 posts
Joined 01/2007

i like this video even tho i have never played this game before.



thanks!

how important was it that you had two crappy draws for high and lo on sixth street when you made the value bet against the split 5s with 77 early on? seems like it would make that spot even better to go for thin value, especially since its a split pot game and you have a back up each way.



yes, having a hand that has a very good chance of winning either side with a moderate chance of scooping is a very favorable situation. in that hand, since he called 5th st with a 5KJ rainbow board, he should have a pair most of the time, since most of his other hands he would probably fold. split 5s makes the most sense (also he might have bet into me with a better pair in the hole), so i tentatively put him on that hand.

on 6th, in addition to picking up the draw, it's also relevant that my board now has 478 on it, so he is less likely to raise even if i am beat, and very likely to check to me on the river as well, giving me the opportunity to show down a modest pair of 7s or bet for value if i improve in either direction. honestly, against that player, i could even see making a thin value bet on the end.

Posted almost 4 years ago

rusty trombone

Avatar for rusty trombone

102 posts
Joined 01/2008


on 6th, in addition to picking up the draw, it's also relevant that my board now has 478 on it, so he is less likely to raise even if i am beat, and very likely to check to me on the river as well, giving me the opportunity to show down a modest pair of 7s or bet for value if i improve in either direction.




yeah good point. i wasnt really thinking about how your board impacts his decision.

thanks for the response.

Posted almost 4 years ago

sean

Avatar for sean

72 posts
Joined 02/2007

omg im not going to be an E fish after i watch this vid. one of the only 2 games i have no idea how to play well, no more free 30/60 gold for you

Posted almost 4 years ago

Moshmopok

Avatar for Moshmopok

87 posts
Joined 01/2008

Great to see such a good stud/8 table play video. I hope you will contribute videos frequently although you said at the beginning this was a guest video.

Posted almost 4 years ago

Keepitsimple

Avatar for Keepitsimple

8 posts
Joined 03/2008

How much do you take into account odds of some cards showing. You only mentioned it once when 2 flush cards showed. Lets say for example you have the hand 77(4) in late position. Noone has put any money except for the bring in who has a 3 showing. Would you raise this if no 7 or 4 were showing and fold if you saw a 7?

Posted almost 4 years ago

blumpster

Avatar for blumpster

156 posts
Joined 01/2007

How much do you take into account odds of some cards showing. You only mentioned it once when 2 flush cards showed. Lets say for example you have the hand 77(4) in late position. Noone has put any money except for the bring in who has a 3 showing. Would you raise this if no 7 or 4 were showing and fold if you saw a 7?



Sounds about right. Certainly the cards that are out have a huge impact on the decision of whether (and how) to play a given hand. For a great introduction to "other games" (o8, stud, stud8, razz), you should definitely watch Joe Tall's "Donk to a Stud" series.

Posted almost 4 years ago

blumpster

Avatar for blumpster

156 posts
Joined 01/2007

Great to see such a good stud/8 table play video. I hope you will contribute videos frequently although you said at the beginning this was a guest video.



This video was made before I became a Deucescracked coach. Now, I expect you will see more of these "ghost" videos from me in the near future.

Posted almost 4 years ago

Raist0000

Avatar for Raist0000

168 posts
Joined 07/2007

Very good video! I'm trying to learn other non-holdem games, so I hope you are making more mid-high stakes videos thanks.

Posted over 3 years ago

MickeyWins

Avatar for MickeyWins

1555 posts
Joined 07/2007

Isenheim

Avatar for Isenheim

1 posts
Joined 08/2008

cyber

Avatar for cyber

12 posts
Joined 12/2009

Time Link to 00:08:35

how about a valuebet here with 77?
he seems to me like the kind of player who will call with just 55...
or is it not a good idea because all his kickers were live, meaning you would more likely do it if say 2 kings and a jack were dead? (as he would imo c/c with a rivered 2pair)

Posted over 1 year ago

cyber

Avatar for cyber

12 posts
Joined 12/2009

Time Link to 00:26:23

I'm not quite sure I understand this call.
Isn't this hand pretty razzy?
Also by just calling you're turning your hand face up imo.
There is at least one better 3Card Low out there and if you catch another ace it will be hard to keep it a secret what you have...Wink

Posted over 1 year ago

ceegee

Avatar for ceegee

637 posts
Joined 05/2008

Time Link to 00:17:34

do you ever limp in early position to balance those kind of hands with your really good hands, as you hate getting 2 bet by a card behind with a bad pair in the hole? This way you can just limp call or limp raise your good hands.

Posted over 1 year ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

Founder
6970 posts
Joined 11/2006

how about a valuebet here with 77?
he seems to me like the kind of player who will call with just 55...
or is it not a good idea because all his kickers were live, meaning you would more likely do it if say 2 kings and a jack were dead? (as he would imo c/c with a rivered 2pair)



I agree somewhat with a valuebet there vs uh_oh, obv its very thin but our hand could be a low-only in his eyes, there is some vale w/5 and 6 on his board to call us with one of those pairs.

Posted over 1 year ago

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

Founder
6970 posts
Joined 11/2006

I'm not quite sure I understand this call.
Isn't this hand pretty razzy?
Also by just calling you're turning your hand face up imo.
There is at least one better 3Card Low out there and if you catch another ace it will be hard to keep it a secret what you have...Wink



It's razzy yes, and I'm sure blump folds if he does not have an Ace up. Not sure if you noticed but uh_oh brought it in for full, this is often a sign up weakness and the player is trying to 'protect' his hand. Mostly junky-razz hands, baby pairs, and mid-pairs (say like (99) (TT) in the hole). We fair decent against those hands.

It is close and blump does mention that in the video.

Posted over 1 year ago

Easy Squeezy

Avatar for Easy Squeezy

994 posts
Joined 07/2009

This video was made before I became a Deucescracked coach. Now, I expect you will see more of these "ghost" videos from me in the near future.


I noticed that this guy is still listed as a DC coach, but hasn't made any vids for a while. Any reason for this?

Posted about 1 year ago

777group

Avatar for 777group

137 posts
Joined 10/2009

Time Link to 00:23:29

is this a standard fold? his range could be wider than that.
even if his range is as tight as you said, is it stil a fold?

Posted 12 months ago

777group

Avatar for 777group

137 posts
Joined 10/2009

Time Link to 00:33:09

is limping here profitable? vs lose opponents? two 4s are dead...

Posted 12 months ago

777group

Avatar for 777group

137 posts
Joined 10/2009

Time Link to 00:37:09

I guess I know why you make the completion on 3rd but I know that it would generate any money for me because when I brick and one of them is going to hit, which is likely to happen, I guess I have to peal once because they only limped?

meh,,, Im just confused Undecided could you elaborate on why completing is way better than just calling?

one benefit for just calling is that they make larger mistakes on 4th when you catch well and they don't because they get worse pot odds.

Posted 12 months ago

777group

Avatar for 777group

137 posts
Joined 10/2009

Time Link to 00:39:32

seems like burning money here completing 3rd. isnt it?

Posted 12 months ago

777group

Avatar for 777group

137 posts
Joined 10/2009

777group

Avatar for 777group

137 posts
Joined 10/2009

Time Link to 00:48:44

isn't raising better here? you don't want to get lowcards in the pot even though your hand looks obvious? it ll look obvious at some point anyway+ people might stil call?

Posted 12 months ago

777group

Avatar for 777group

137 posts
Joined 10/2009

Time Link to 00:50:16

he ll bet for sure when you check, won't he? so c/r might be better. I know he isn't folding but just for balancing blabla

Posted 12 months ago



HomePoker Videos → Ghost → blumpster (#1) - 30/60 Stud/8