Ever wonder why you can't break into that higher limit you're always taking shots at? FoxwoodsFiend moves up through different stakes of No-Limit, starting off at .5/1 and playing gradually higher stakes. He illustrates the different types of gameplay at each limit while explaining the adjustments players from one level to the next must make in order to be successful in their ascent. FWF talks about the different types of fish and regulars at the varied stakes, plays he would make at one level but not at the next, and touches on which playing styles are more suitable for which stakes. DeucesCracked is going to show you how to make the leap.
Subscribe to this Series
FoxwoodsFiend plays 3/6 NL 6-max. While talking about the overall dynamics of the games, he adjusts to a table of tougher regs than one normally finds at 3-6 to try explaining how to beat all kinds of players at 3-6 NL.
Posted 9 months ago
tags: foxwoodsfiend $600nl 3/6nl table dynamics adjustments tough tables beating tough regulars
Mid Stakes,
55 min long
Comments for Episode Five
derosnec
99 hand. you were utg raiser and the lag was in CO, with a loose guy on the button. doesn't that change things abit regarding his 3betting range?
Posted 9 months ago
Lewto
Why are you so good, Dr. Foxwoods?
Posted 9 months ago
terp
love your thought process and detailed explanations
Posted 9 months ago
kyotoisok
cool video.. this is what i like
Posted 9 months ago
FoxwoodsFiend
Exec Producerjust a little. LAGs aren't exactly shy in regards to reraising other laggy UTG raisers and the loose button doesn't matter too much because it's not like he's cold-calling the reraise too often.
Posted 9 months ago
hq7878
"bifurcated"
lol
great vid
Posted 9 months ago
FoxwoodsFiend
Exec Producernow you got me all self-conscious because i don't remember saying that. i didn't misuse it did i?
Posted 9 months ago
beachbum
Ugh, I hate the QT hand. First of all, on the river if you raise AI you only have $80 or so more for him to call giving him like 12:1. It was probably just a brain fart by you since the near time bank expiration probably flustered you. Second, I wouldn't have played it as "slow" as you did. Between your LAGgro image and his willingness to stack off light (TPWK earlier), you should be able to get his stack here every time he's got a decent piece. I'd probably bet bigger on the flop to build a pot. On the turn, I don't think mediocre players bluff c/r turns hardly at all. If you shove, he's probably calling about 90% of his c/r'ing range. Even with hands like AsXs, AQ/QJ/JT/possibly even KQ, he'll crying call your shove getting ~3:1. You're crushed by a small percentage of his range here on the turn, but you're getting it in on the river anyway. Thoughts?
Posted 9 months ago
beachbum
I've watched every vid in your series so far. I'm definitely enjoying them and learning a bit. A couple general questions though:
Open-minraising on the button - I know if you do this, you should be doing it the majority of the time for metagame/balancing. However, is this raise amount ever dependent on the players in the BB? I would think that for 2 thinking TAG's in the blinds, this should be fine. One, because they're more willing to play back at you and this allows you to call resteals more liberally since you're effectively deeper now in position. And two, minraising as opposed to a 3.5x raise allows them to fold about the same range of hands.
However, with opponents who defend too liberally/are stations/don't play back much/generally suck at poker, aren't you happy to raise more and build a bigger pot in position against them? I know this is rarely the case at higher stakes, but opening to 3.5x or 4x would seem optimal vs. say a weak-tight-nitty SB and a loose-passive-fish BB.
Game Selection - You've mentioned a couple times about using "Avg. Pot Size" as the main criteria to game select for a level. For me, I've always seemed to look primarily at "Avg. Players to Flop". I mean at 1/2 and lower, you can probably always sit at a table with this number at least over 30%. However at 2/4 and higher, this seems almost impossible to do. Can you explain your experiences with your game selection metric as opposed to mine with regards to the various stakes?
Sry, one more thing. Regardless of your openraise sizing for the CO or button, what becomes your 4-bet range now? I know it will be very dependent on the player who 3-bets, whether he's a blind or OTB, etc. But compare if you raised in the HJ and the BB 3-bets, as opposed to if you open OTB and the same BB 3-bets. I seem to almost always be flat-calling my entire range I want to continue with in these steal/resteal spots but don't particularly like it since I feel I should be 4-betting here but am not very confident which hands to do it. For example, I've experimented with smooth-calling AK here like 100% of the time lately.
I guess that's all for now. :-)
Posted 9 months ago
FoxwoodsFiend
Exec Producerpoint me to the time stamp of the hand and i'll take a look at it
Posted 9 months ago
beachbum
The hand begins at 37:50. You flop the nuts.
Posted 9 months ago
FoxwoodsFiend
Exec Produceryeah just rewatched it. as i said in the video, i think i misplayd the hand. i don't mind the slowplay precisely because if the board double pairs i can safely fold and he's never folding the river anyway. my bet sizing i did for metagame on the flop although obviously a bigger bet makes it easier to get stacks in obviously. on the river i have an easy raise all-in and just had a brain-fart
Posted 9 months ago
FoxwoodsFiend
Exec Producerre: minaising on the button, i'm comfortable doing it to just about anybody. i'm willing to forgo building big pots in position because a) i like having deep-stacks which gives me more room to maneuver in the marginal non-nut situations i often find myself in and b) because my range is weaker otb i'm more ften than not going to have bajunky garbage so i would rather be able to steal as cheaply as possible in such situations even if it makes it harder to stack my opponents in the rare situations i actually flop top pair or better.
Posted 9 months ago
lrence
awesome awesome awesome. as a learning fish who thinks he can swim, these videos instantly make me look down under to how deep the waters really are. does that make sense?
when i try to explain why i am so reeled in by multi-level thinking poker and how much there really is to know about the game (to bystanders who I cannot see this), this series is just another GREAT example and how I know I'm in for the long haul.
so simply, i just wanted to say, because this series just makes me want to keep going and going, I can say I'm sure it's inspirational not only to me, but many.
thanks for the great work.
Posted 8 months ago
maco144
Finally got around to watching this one - one of the best on the site, awesome stuff.
Posted 8 months ago
drexah
usually not one to praise lightly or often but your videos really do deserve some serious attention. great series and especially this one, great video.
Posted 5 months ago