Sick video again from the Diesel.

I don't have access to it at work, but one hand I wanted to ask about:

We have KJ headsup vs. a BB defender. On the turn the board is 9xT9, and you said this is a good board to bet because 1) worse hands (Q8 or 7J or somethng) will call and 2) we usually won't get checkraised on this board.

My experience has been the opposite with regard to number 2. That is, this is exactly the type of board that defendants are checkraising me on the turn. I feel like, if I'm likely to be check-raised, betting is especially bad with a gutshot and two overs (because I SHOULDN'T fold, imo). Have I just been running bad, or does this advice maybe change as you move up in stakes?

No, vs. more aggro/tricky opponents I like a check on that turn. My bet there was very villain specific.

So, if villain 1) would peel flop and/or turn very light and 2) is very passive and unlikely to c/r, bet? But, if villain 1) would not peel as light and 2) is more aggro and might take a shot at us, check and re-evaluate? Coolio.

Do you disagree with me that this is the type of board that bad LAGs might take shots at us on? Thanks.

Awesome vid once again!

btw Natto is a horrible japanese breakfast food. It is fermented soy beans that smell like ass.

You dont wanna mistake that for peanut butter.

:P

Hi

once again a very nice video - very informative!

But I have a question to the penultimate hand where you had 99 in the big blind on a 6QK board. You said you would fold to a flop raise but what would you do when he calls or raises the turn?