Episode One

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Episode One

In the series premiere, sthief09 conducts a self-review, focusing on fundamental concepts such as preflop strategy, using position, and pot control.

tags: 2-tabling sthief09 nlhe ssnl small stakes no limit preflop play pot control bet sizing using position

This Series: Turning the Corner

Josh's highly-anticipated small-stakes No Limit guide. With all the widely available information on the internet, games are tougher than ever. This trickles all the way down to the small stakes and even micro-limit games. If you're not constantly improving, thousands of players who are will pass you right by, and as a result it's no longer good enough to be merely competent. Sthief09 moves from 50NL to 200NL, teaching you solid fundamentals, and showing you when it's correct to deviate from tight, straightfoward strategy. Whether you're a new player who wants to beat the small stakes games, or you're a veteran looking to increase your winrate and move up, this series will help you turn the corner on your poker game.

| Next Video: Episode Two

Subscribe to Subscribe to this series Subscribe to this series



Comments for Episode One

dildog
Set of Deuces
339 posts
Joined 01/08

nice.. this is what i need... i play 1/2 mostly and i am having a hard time moving up to 2/4... tho i have a 30k BR i just don't have enough skills to beat 2/4 consistently... i spew a lot of chips most of the time... need to get back to the basics and try to play good solid poker..

Posted Mar 7, 2008 3:17pm

rjpageuk
Deuce High
33 posts
Joined 02/08

Thanks for the video, really informative and very appropriate for my current situation.

Posted Mar 7, 2008 5:08pm

auswalk
Deuce High
8 posts
Joined 02/08

What time of day did you make this video? I would love to mind some tables with maniacs like this.

Posted Mar 7, 2008 7:42pm

Echelon
Deuce High
19 posts
Joined 01/08

solid content, bad vid quality (checked FLV and WMV version)

Posted Mar 8, 2008 11:52am

DeathDonkey
Founder
Quad Deuces
2183 posts
Joined 11/06

solid content, bad vid quality (checked FLV and WMV version)



I checked out the WMV version and it looks maybe a little less crystal clear visually than some videos but the audio quality was good. Can you be more specific about what quality issue you were seeing so Josh can be aware of it for future vids? I think one thing that might have caused a lower visual quality is that he is re-recording the table as he says at the beginning of the video, going over his own video and analyzing his own play after the fact, so you have an effect of like making a copy of a copy, degrading in visual quality.

-DeathDonkey

Posted Mar 8, 2008 11:24pm

Entity
Founder
Quad Deuces
2856 posts
Joined 11/06


I checked out the WMV version and it looks maybe a little less crystal clear visually than some videos but the audio quality was good. Can you be more specific about what quality issue you were seeing so Josh can be aware of it for future vids? I think one thing that might have caused a lower visual quality is that he is re-recording the table as he says at the beginning of the video, going over his own video and analyzing his own play after the fact, so you have an effect of like making a copy of a copy, degrading in visual quality.

-DeathDonkey



Yeah, we're aware of the bug that caused the problems with video clarity in this one though it's still quite visible if you set it to proper resolution (full size, 1600px wide). The bug shouldn't be an issue in the future from what I can tell, though.

Rob

Posted Mar 8, 2008 11:49pm

sthief09
Exec Producer
Set of Deuces
321 posts
Joined 07/07


I checked out the WMV version and it looks maybe a little less crystal clear visually than some videos but the audio quality was good. Can you be more specific about what quality issue you were seeing so Josh can be aware of it for future vids? I think one thing that might have caused a lower visual quality is that he is re-recording the table as he says at the beginning of the video, going over his own video and analyzing his own play after the fact, so you have an effect of like making a copy of a copy, degrading in visual quality.

-DeathDonkey

Yeah, we're aware of the bug that caused the problems with video clarity in this one though it's still quite visible if you set it to proper resolution (full size, 1600px wide). The bug shouldn't be an issue in the future from what I can tell, though.

Rob



yeah that's my bad. I recorded it in an awkward resolution

Posted Mar 9, 2008 6:19am

27offsuited
Deuce High
4 posts
Joined 03/08

Hi sthief09, can you please post your hud from FT + the theme you are using? Thanks.

Posted Mar 9, 2008 2:43pm

sthief09
Exec Producer
Set of Deuces
321 posts
Joined 07/07

Hi sthief09, can you please post your hud from FT + the theme you are using? Thanks.




www.sthief09.com. I think that should all be up there

Posted Mar 9, 2008 11:58pm

123motion
Deuce High
5 posts
Joined 03/08

a few comments/questions. very good video overall.
first the J8 hand vs mclovin is nasty, just nasty. definitely had me smiling for a while :)

a few hands i had questions on though.
first, what's the deal with the openshove from the SB w/ K9o vs the shortstack? i can't figure this one out at all... it happens pretty quickly and you don't comment on it at all.

second, you CO open 66 and see KJ7twotone vs the 15/12 BB. i didn't quite get your reasons for betting the flop instead of checking it back. wouldn't checking back be the standard play here, or is this flop too wet for that?

third (and most importantly)
the 3bet with KQo vs the 19/17. isn't KQo usually a bad 3betting hand, b/c we're trying to 3bet a polarized range - just premium hands and speculative hands. why is 3betting a more marginal hand like KQo better than flatting here?

thanks a lot for your time

Posted Mar 10, 2008 1:30am

27offsuited
Deuce High
4 posts
Joined 03/08

Thanks sthief.

Posted Mar 10, 2008 3:02am

sthief09
Exec Producer
Set of Deuces
321 posts
Joined 07/07

a few comments/questions. very good video overall.
first the J8 hand vs mclovin is nasty, just nasty. definitely had me smiling for a while :)

a few hands i had questions on though.
first, what's the deal with the openshove from the SB w/ K9o vs the shortstack? i can't figure this one out at all... it happens pretty quickly and you don't comment on it at all.

second, you CO open 66 and see KJ7twotone vs the 15/12 BB. i didn't quite get your reasons for betting the flop instead of checking it back. wouldn't checking back be the standard play here, or is this flop too wet for that?

third (and most importantly)
the 3bet with KQo vs the 19/17. isn't KQo usually a bad 3betting hand, b/c we're trying to 3bet a polarized range - just premium hands and speculative hands. why is 3betting a more marginal hand like KQo better than flatting here?

thanks a lot for your time




1. yeah, I meant to point that one out but I guess I didn't see it while I was talking. that was a mistake. I wasn't used to the stakes and thought he had a much shorter stack than he had. IIRC he had $10 and it just didn't register that it's 20 BB for whatever reason.

2. my hand itself doesn't have much value. I don't remember this hand and how passive the BB is. if he's very passive, then I can see checking it down. but vs. someone capabe of betting draws on the turn where I can't call, my hand has little value when I check. so I c-bet basically has a bluff, hoping that he'd have a pocket pair below JJ, which I think makes up a very large part of a 15/12's range calling the BB. Pocket pairs and premium unpaired cards like AQ and KQs. I think he folds just about everything else.

3. no, I think that's kind of an old school misconception. first, look at the player. 17 PFR is pretty high, and 19 VPIP is pretty low. so it means he's the type to raise a lot but not call much. so I can expect to pick up the pot a lot. but say I'm wrong, and he calls 3-bets with a wide range. KQ is a very strong hand vs. that range. he'll be forced to float some flops and play back at me, so if I flop top pair I feel very confident with my hand. the type of player I'd be more comfortable callign the KQ against would be a 16/13 type. he's raising a tight range, so 3-betting light in general is not profitable, and KQ is an especially bad hand to 3-bet with since he's only calling better hands.

but think about how this changes as his raising range gets looser. but for someone on the other end like a 30/24, he's either going to call with only good hands, and I'm turning a profit just by 3-betting (since he's raising so many 52s and T7o), or he's going to start defending his raises, and my hand becomes a monster. (the exception is if he 4-bets a lot. then I don't want to 3-bet hands with value that can't get it in because I won't get to see a flop)

Posted Mar 11, 2008 2:54pm

123motion
Deuce High
5 posts
Joined 03/08

thanks, that's making a lot more sense now.

Posted Mar 12, 2008 3:26pm

LOL_CARDRUNNERS
Deuce High
53 posts
Joined 03/08

haha first time ive ever seen myself in a video. just to let you know, im not a nit like you kept saying i was :] and that J8 was hilarious. also if anyone plays 50nl regularly then follow niitikitktit or whatever his name is around because he is soooooooooo bad.

Posted Mar 16, 2008 10:40am

sthief09
Exec Producer
Set of Deuces
321 posts
Joined 07/07

haha first time ive ever seen myself in a video. just to let you know, im not a nit like you kept saying i was :] and that J8 was hilarious. also if anyone plays 50nl regularly then follow niitikitktit or whatever his name is around because he is soooooooooo bad.



yeah, my first 100+ hands on you, you must've been cold decked pretty bad (10/7) but that's usually enough for me to assume someone's a nit preflop. based on the way you adjusted, I definitely started to realize that as the session went on. you played very well

Posted Mar 16, 2008 2:20pm

grebgokz
Deuce High
28 posts
Joined 02/08

Great vid.

Totally irelevant but I still think you should put a warning sign on the nikitikita guy. I accually made a player search on the guy and found out that he was 9 tabling 6-max on NL50. So I sat down at 4 of his tables and got completely different stats on him. VPiP/PFR/TA 20/16/3 over a 500 hands sample. Wich seems more standard solid TAG to me then the LAGTard maniac you played against. Guess he was on mega tilt or someone had his account hijacked or something.

This was a bit of topic but still an intresting note I felt.

Posted Mar 24, 2008 1:12pm

gurgey
Deuce High
1 post
Joined 04/08

for some reason i can't sync this video to my ipod. something about wrong encoding. is there a "proper" mp4 encoded version available anywhere?

Posted Apr 2, 2008 10:51am

Entity
Founder
Quad Deuces
2856 posts
Joined 11/06

for some reason i can't sync this video to my ipod. something about wrong encoding. is there a "proper" mp4 encoded version available anywhere?



We don't provide Ipod versions for 2-tabling and 4-tabling videos. The MP4 version that is provided is for Mac users/PC users, and you can convert the WMV to an Ipod version on your own if you want, but we've found that 2-tabling and 4-tabling versions look sub-par on Ipods and so we haven't provided them.

Rob

Posted Apr 2, 2008 4:40pm

ivfilms
Deuce High
1 post
Joined 04/08

Hi, I am pretty new to poker. In this video why do you say you make bad folds when you have position on Mclovin (he was 59/16) because you are both deep stacked. You have seemingly bad hands (like 10 8 offsuit and 7 8 offsuit) and you say you made a mistake in folding because you should have raised with these hands to isolate the deepstacked player. Why do you need to raise with those types of hands vs deep stacks? Because of implied odds?

Posted Apr 4, 2008 12:09am

c7h7e
Deuce High
19 posts
Joined 04/08

really good videos, wish we had some 6max Omaha PL Hi & 8.

Posted Apr 4, 2008 3:52am

negtv capability
Deuce High
9 posts
Joined 04/08

New to DC. Even though I exclusively play full ring, I found this video useful, because I recognize the need to isolate players with too high VPIP and/ or too high fold to CB %. I believe you called this your bread and butter. Those are probably the two most important stats I should be looking at when deciding to isolate then? Does it matter much what their cold call % is? I would assume that if their VPIP was high, I'd like a high cc% also. Maybe a low cc% would be okay also, because if they fold I don't mind, but I guess I'd rather they call, then fold the flop to my CB. I think I remember seeing an isolation play with T7s from LP, would you recommend this at full ring vs. 1 limper who had say a VPIP of 20 plus and a CB fold of 70% plus?

Posted Apr 20, 2008 6:29am

negtv capability
Deuce High
9 posts
Joined 04/08

apologies. I tried to edit the above after realizing that I got your video, which I did watch believe it or not, mixed up w/ bottomset's FR100 video, but was too late I guess.

Posted Apr 20, 2008 7:41am

VLV
Deuce High
2 posts
Joined 01/08

I hope you still read this thread once in a while.


There was a hand where McLovin had KJ and Nikitiki had AK, I don't remember the exact action but the board was KJ88 and on the turn the pot was $50 I beleive. McLovin bet $15 with effective stacks of $30. You said it was a good bet size whether you had a strong hand or were bluffing since it commited Nikitiki to his stack while allowing McLoving to get a feel of Nikitiki's holdings. So are you saying that McLovin should fold a hand that he was bluffing with if Nikitiki pushed? McLovin would have to put in $15 into a $95 pot. Assuming its not complete bluff and you have at lease some piece, wouldn't that be an easy call?

Posted Jul 3, 2008 9:29am