---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Gman (Micro/Small Stakes)

great stuff!

Time Link to 00:37:58

it's actually a theoretical mistake to bet bigger with better ranges

yes, we'd like to get called when we have 'it' but if our range is a static strength and our bet size increases, we just let our opponents make an easy fold

Time Link to 00:40:22

really like this example as a good spot for a value overbet

the psychology here is awesome, which you say. his hand is <A8 basically always and even though we have a million value combos, he can put us on a lot of bluffs and also focus on his hand's being face up as a reason to call

it's actually a theoretical mistake to bet bigger with better ranges

yes, we'd like to get called when we have 'it' but if our range is a static strength and our bet size increases, we just let our opponents make an easy fold

Agreed if we are looking at it from a purely theoretical perspective, which I think is rarely the best way of approaching our betsizing decisions in practice. I discussed this at length in the comments section of the previous video if you wanna check it out.

really like this example as a good spot for a value overbet

the psychology here is awesome, which you say. his hand is <A8 basically always and even though we have a million value combos, he can put us on a lot of bluffs and also focus on his hand's being face up as a reason to call

Thanks man, def one of my favorite spots as well

great stuff!

Thanks as always

Agreed if we are looking at it from a purely theoretical perspective, which I think is rarely the best way of approaching our betsizing decisions in practice. I discussed this at length in the comments section of the previous video if you wanna check it out.

ah, hadn't seen it yet, cool.

thanks for clarifying

Thanks for another good video Gman

+1

Good Video Gman........keep em coming.

These videos and your thought processes are all over the place and you keep losing your train of thought, getting back and forth. It can be very confusing and instead of talking about concrete things, you drift off a lot. ;/

Time Link to 00:35:41

About the size in a more general balanced gameplan in this dynamic: considering that on this flop i guess we are usually not fatsplaying our bigger hands and we are calling them besides weak qx , medium sv hands and some floats, don't u think betting slightly bigger on the turn (something like 170) when villain checks works better for the strongest part of our range(expecially considering the spr on the river that would give us a psb) and still does good for protection and still sets a decent price for bluffing?