Episode Four

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Episode Four

Dan showcases some interesting hands playing 10/20 with some of the ballers of fullring NL.

tags: replayer full ring nlhe dj sensei $2000nl $2knl ipod friendly

This Series: To Nit or not to Nit

DJ Sensei teaches you everything you need to know about full ring play in a 4 episode mini-series. Follow Dan from micro stakes all the way up through 2000NL.

Previous Video: Episode Three

Subscribe to Subscribe to this series Subscribe to this series



Comments for Episode Four

Gotcha
Deuce High
9 posts
Joined 03/08

the best FR videos on teh internet imo

Posted Mar 24, 2008 2:46pm

rusty trombone
Deuce High
99 posts
Joined 01/08

its not that interesting when you just show hands where you flop sets, boats and quads.

*sips haterade*

okay. there is some other stuff in here. maybe ill watch the entire video before talking shit next time!

i dont really understand why you sort of mock fyoudubby, saying he "thinks he is reading hands well", but at the same time pat yourself on the back for repping exactly what he thinks you have.

good vid.

Posted Mar 24, 2008 3:10pm

kondor101
Set of Deuces
477 posts
Joined 02/08

Well I liked it loads.

Sure we could have seen lots of hands where you miss your set, and your suited cons hit nothing. But what use would that be? What is more important, as we play like nits, is to know how to build the pot once we hit, how to defend against draws and how to use our image to represent hands we have not got.

Excellent.

Posted Mar 24, 2008 3:49pm

DJ Sensei
Exec Producer
Quad Deuces
1145 posts
Joined 10/07

its not that interesting when you just show hands where you flop sets, boats and quads.

*sips haterade*

okay. there is some other stuff in here. maybe ill watch the entire video before talking shit next time!

i dont really understand why you sort of mock fyoudubby, saying he "thinks he is reading hands well", but at the same time pat yourself on the back for repping exactly what he thinks you have.

good vid.



I wasn't really mocking him, I was mainly just noting that he chatted something like "nice set" which I think is silly and doesn't serve any good purpose (especially if you're wrong). Most of the reason I was able to make that move was that he was a solid regular who could (hopefully) make big laydowns with hands like KQ, AK, or AA there.

And yes I was definitely patting myself on the back for repping exactly what he thinks I have. Thats the point of a good bluff!

Posted Mar 24, 2008 4:48pm

Big Owl
Deuce High
62 posts
Joined 02/08

at 44:24 you play 78cc you give the impression that you think villain has AA yet you call his all-in as a 58 42 underdog. Is this really a good play?

Posted Mar 24, 2008 6:37pm

Ulkis
Set of Deuces
392 posts
Joined 10/07

I liked this video because each hand except the first one is a case study in its own right and am sure it will pay dividends to study not just the hands but also the underlying concepts at depth.

Posted Mar 24, 2008 6:40pm

kondor101
Set of Deuces
477 posts
Joined 02/08

you think villain has AA yet you call his all-in as a 58 42 underdog. Is this really a good play?



Its a no brainer from where I am sitting, he must be getting something like 3-1 pot odds by the time the all in happens.

Posted Mar 24, 2008 7:20pm

DJ Sensei
Exec Producer
Quad Deuces
1145 posts
Joined 10/07

at 44:24 you play 78cc you give the impression that you think villain has AA yet you call his all-in as a 58 42 underdog. Is this really a good play?



I don't know he has AA, but I know that I've got great equity against most anything (47/53 against AA with no club, 43/57 against AA with a club, probably similar against just about any one-pair hand) and my bet-3bet line may often get him to fold a top pair or overpair hand, since I was in the BB and could have any 2. Also, I'd play any 2-pair or set the same way, so if you're familiar with G-bucks, then I'm actually a favorite overall range-wise.

Board: Tc 6h 2c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 29.615% 29.62% 00.00% 12314 0.00 { AcAd }
Hand 1: 70.385% 70.38% 00.00% 29266 0.00 { TT, 66, 22, T6s, T2s, 9c8c, 9c7c, 8c7c, 62s, 5c4c, 5c3c, 4c3c, T6o, T2o, 62o }

So AA isn't looking so good now, eh? The main point I was trying to make is that you should generally be more cautious with your big pairs postflop when you go for a limp-reraise and whiff. I had another hand set to go in the video but the converter didn't work for it. I think it also shows that concept pretty well:

(25/50nl)
Seat 1: luggy ($850.00 in chips)
Seat 2: FlamingCarro ($2,970.00 in chips)
Seat 3: DJMicScrew ($6,101.05 in chips)
Seat 4: redrockets55 ($985.00 in chips)
Seat 5: Ajax22 ($4,710.00 in chips)
Seat 6: OwNd ($2,507.00 in chips)
Seat 7: Kurtis Blow ($5,000.00 in chips)
Seat 8: RedSoxIn08 ($680.00 in chips)
Seat 9: DoctorDoom ($5,100.00 in chips)
Seat 10: biplomat ($3,463.00 in chips)
OwNd: posts small blind $25
Kurtis Blow: posts big blind $50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to DoctorDoom [Ah Ad]
RedSoxIn08: folds
DoctorDoom: calls $50.00
biplomat: folds
luggy: folds
FlamingCarro: folds
DJMicScrew: calls $50.00
redrockets55: folds
Ajax22: folds
OwNd: calls $25.00
Kurtis Blow: checks
*** FLOP *** [Td 8c 9d]
OwNd: bets $150.00
Kurtis Blow: calls $150.00
DoctorDoom: calls $150.00
DJMicScrew: calls $150.00
*** TURN *** [Td 8c 9d] [Ks]
OwNd: checks
Kurtis Blow: checks
DoctorDoom: checks
DJMicScrew: checks
*** RIVER *** [Td 8c 9d Ks] [Ac]
OwNd: checks
Kurtis Blow: checks
DoctorDoom: bets $500.00
DJMicScrew: folds
OwNd: calls $500.00
Kurtis Blow: folds
*** SHOW DOWN ***
DoctorDoom: shows [Ah Ad] (Three of a Kind, Aces)
OwNd: mucks hand
DoctorDoom collected $1,795.00 from pot

Posted Mar 24, 2008 8:12pm

Big Owl
Deuce High
62 posts
Joined 02/08

I understood your main point about playing AA. I guess I just got confused about your talking about his AA hand before the hand started and was only using AA as his range against us. Thanks for the explanation. I thought the video itself was great. I would have loved this series 6 months ago. Now that I joined DC I have been only playing 6 max, as almost everything seemed more geared to that. As an aside I want to say to you guys that the site is fantastic. Almost every video has good clear content and a purpose for being on the site , other than take up space. I sincerely believ that this is the best coaching/forum site on the net.

Posted Mar 24, 2008 9:05pm

DJ Sensei
Exec Producer
Quad Deuces
1145 posts
Joined 10/07

Glad to have you on board! We'll be coming out with a lot more great 6-max material pretty soon, so keep your eyes peeled.

Posted Mar 24, 2008 11:44pm

lexxy
Deuce High
4 posts
Joined 02/08

I play full ring, I think this series is great and it has really helped me a lot. I've watched and re-watched basically every hand and analyzed them all as best as I can. I think I got a lot out of it due to the easy to understand format. More full ring please :)

Posted Mar 26, 2008 1:34am

gpfs7
Deuce High
85 posts
Joined 03/08

do you have a hud download available for your pokerstars full ring game?

Posted Mar 27, 2008 7:53pm

DJ Sensei
Exec Producer
Quad Deuces
1145 posts
Joined 10/07

Yes I just uploaded my Stars version, its located at http://www.senseipoker.com/?p=28 along with the FTP one. Follow the instructions and you should be good to go!

Posted Mar 27, 2008 9:46pm

SlimboKarvell
Deuce High
61 posts
Joined 01/08

Nice showing of! Now I know why I can't win; I don't flop enough sets or quads!

Posted Apr 2, 2008 11:12am

KillBill
Deuce High
15 posts
Joined 03/08

Thanks for the great series. I would love to see more full ring videos as well to gear up for more live play during the summer.
I have one question about the video: In the hand with 33 vs KJ (min 30) how would you play this postflop from the villain's perspective? Your limp/ call preflop screams pocket pair so with this low flop the check behind is probably good. When he hits the king on the turn and you check what would you do if you were him?

Posted Apr 18, 2008 2:05pm

DJ Sensei
Exec Producer
Quad Deuces
1145 posts
Joined 10/07

I'd probably bet the turn most of the time, but if the villain was very straightforward and unlikely to give action I might check behind and try for one bet on the river. Once checkraised, I'd either fold or call depending on the villain's aggression, and I'd rarely stack off the river unless he was a maniac bluffer.

Posted Apr 19, 2008 12:06am