iPOKErU
105 posts
Joined 01/2009
28:00, when you fill up your AT on the turn.
When I was looking at it, putting myself in somebody elses shoes, it seemed so so so obvous that you either filled up or didnt bet the nutstraight on the flop.
I somehow feel like checking there to have somebody else improve is better than betting out, but only since there is no low possible. If there was a low possible imo it is better to bet, to charge lowdraws.
What do you think?
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
danzasmack
Founder
1823 posts
Joined 02/2007
Definitely has merit now that I think about it. Not even really on that level just take it one level down - if anyone had anything they would have bet. Now I can't lose the hand. But I also can't win much on it.
Checking has to be better there, especially considering the button would have bet any FD/SD in that spot.
Nice pick up!
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
liquid_quik
2064 posts
Joined 09/2008
danzasmack
Founder
1823 posts
Joined 02/2007
Raist0000
168 posts
Joined 07/2007
danzasmack
Founder
1823 posts
Joined 02/2007
this is a good preflop call? Your hand is terrible I think...
I think getting 7-1 w/set value w/JJ is probably close to bad. KK is 100% call as is QQ. JJ is close but good enough i think. I'm folding all small PPs obv.
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Schweig
Coach
980 posts
Joined 10/2008
The hand with ATTx on ATK5, you forgot to add your additional fullhouse outs on the turn.
I saw some pre-flop open folds that I wasn't unsure whether they were standard or whether you just missed them from doing the video:
AK65 single suited (to ace I think) in CO.
KJ34 double suited in CO.
9543 double suited in CO.
Short-handed LO8 is one of my weakest games, mostly because of not knowing exactly how much to open up (obviously table dynamics are important but any general feedback on these specific hands would be appreciated).
Posted about 2 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote