Episode Six

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Episode Six

Joe coaches Danzasmack at Omaha/8 with a combination of slides, hand replays from Danzasmack's Omaha session, and analysis with the help of an equity calculator. Watch Danzasmack progress as a mixed games stud!

tags: joe tall donk to stud other games danzasmack omaha/8 omaha hi/lo coaching session hand replayer ipod friendly mixed games mix games

This Series: From a Donk to a Stud

Joe Tall teaches other games each week through an engaging PowerPoint presentation. Stud Hi, O8, Stud 8 and Razz. Ever get bored with Hold'em and wondered why the Big Game in Bobby's room is always mixed? Yeah, we did too. Watch Joe equip you with the tools to hold your own.

Previous Video: Episode Five | Next Video: Episode Seven

Subscribe to Subscribe to this Series Subscribe to this series



Comments for Episode Six

BostonBen
Deuce High
38 posts
Joined 01/08

Great Video, really made some huge leaks blatently obvious. I love the conversation after the ending you forgot to cut, it gives a little insight into all the thought u guys put into this. You sound like a great coach, I wish I could afford ya lol. Well Im rambling but thatnks alot for the great work guys

Posted Feb 9, 2008 2:41pm

Ulkis
Pair of Deuces
248 posts
Joined 10/07

Great video again. Could someone clarify/give cliff notes what are these pointers from Gergery referred to in the middle of the video and also right in the end?

(also, apologies for being such a moron/pest last Sunday, I have felt really ashamed all week, don't usually drink that many beers...from now on, on topic only)

Posted Feb 9, 2008 3:07pm

Joe Tall
Founder
Quad Deuces
1537 posts
Joined 11/06

Great Video, really made some huge leaks blatently obvious. I love the conversation after the ending you forgot to cut, it gives a little insight into all the thought u guys put into this. You sound like a great coach, I wish I could afford ya lol. Well Im rambling but thatnks alot for the great work guys



OPPS! I thought I tried to edit that out, sorry for the F-bombs. But, yeah, there are a lot of convos from behind the scenes for our production. This actually goes on for another 8m or so as I'm saving things and stuff. I guess I "missed" when I edited.

I should keep it, yes? We can cut out an upload a new version at the sign off point.

Posted Feb 9, 2008 3:45pm

Joe Tall
Founder
Quad Deuces
1537 posts
Joined 11/06

Great video again. Could someone clarify/give cliff notes what are these pointers from Gergery referred to in the middle of the video and also right in the end?



Basically what Gergery said to me, as I was leaking HUGE w/trips, was be careful when flopping low trips on a board that has another low. As there is a low draw, so the pots are often "cut in half" which doesnt make your equity so great. We are sooooo used to thinking we have a HUGE hand in Hold'em when we flop trips or a set, obv. We have to be very careful in O8 as the pots are split for low. This is why Ray Zee says, in Hi/Low Split, that a set of KK can often be 'strong' (pot equity wise) than a set of AA, since when a set of AA flops there will be a low draw out there often.

And Gergery said to watch your kickers when you make trips, the higher all three your kickers, the better your 'full house draw' as it's so easy to have a huge hands in O8. With 3 overcard kickers we have 9 outs to counterfeit a made full house. Like if you have A5T9 on a 554 flop, this is solid trips. (and a hand that Chuck recently played, btw.) The trips in the example that Chuck played is a tough spot for a Hold'em player. In my learning stage, I would never got away from it like Chuck did, but sure would have played the flop the same. Go back and look at the example, it's clear how dangerous this is for a Hold'em-Donk.

(also, apologies for being such a moron/pest last Sunday, I have felt really ashamed all week, don't usually drink that many beers...from now on, on topic only)



Hey, np, no worries. I have been VERY guilty of drunk-posting in the past! heh!

Posted Feb 9, 2008 3:57pm

Jeff W
Deuce High
18 posts
Joined 01/08

On the AAJc5c hand pre flop... what is the reason for checking this? The hand has a decent equity edge(conservatively at least 40% equity in a 3 way pot) and we have position on one of the players.

Posted Feb 10, 2008 6:09am

Joe Tall
Founder
Quad Deuces
1537 posts
Joined 11/06

On the AAJc5c hand pre flop... what is the reason for checking this? The hand has a decent equity edge(conservatively at least 40% equity in a 3 way pot) and we have position on one of the players.



Jeff, I ran a somewhat conservative simulation in the video and it came out to ~39%.

Against two totally random hands I get 46%, that's the best you can get.

Now lets work at a realistic "worst":

Hand Pot equity
AAJc5c 32.71%
As2s87 35.73%
KQ34 31.56%

Now against a suited Ace w/a 2 and a PLO hand:
AAJc5c 33.71%
As2s** 39.85%
KhQhJT 26.44%

One more, w/a sutied Ace w/a 3 and just a KQ:
AAJc5c 36.44%
As3s** 38.44%
KhQh** 25.12%

I'm not sure where you are getting your equity calc from. We dont have a suited Ace, we have a trap-low A5 and really only have a high only hand OOP. Check, play a small pot on a good flop is our best action.

It's not going to take much, like a suited A5s or any A2,A3 to make this a raise as we talk about in the video. AAJc5c, just doesnt have the mustard. Off the top of my head, this hand is about equal to pocket 7s in Hold'em in this situation, cold-equity-wise. I think if you ran some sims, w/77 vs some random hands you'll find about 46% equity, and once you toss in an overcard combo, or suitedness to the other hand your equity will avg about 37% range.

It's close, yes. Just like having 77 here would be close and I'd rather see a flop in a smaller pot w/77 in Limit Holdem.

Posted Feb 10, 2008 7:44am

Jeff W
Deuce High
18 posts
Joined 01/08

I'm not sure where you are getting your equity calc from.



I ran some ranges on PPT:

Omaha Hi/Lo Simulation
398,290 trials
AdJc5cAh 39.33%
A2** 34.03%
Top 50% 26.64%

Omaha Hi/Lo Simulation
398,431 trials
AdJc5cAh 40.64%
Top 20% 32.95%
Top 95% 26.40%

I ran several sims with variations (it doesn't matter a whole lot whether SB plays anywhere 50->95% of hands) and end up with 39-42% equity for our hand. This is also including uber hands(AA2*, etc) in both their ranges that we can eliminate based on their limps. I would certainly raise 77 in holdem here as well--again we have ~40% equity from my calcs:

Hand 0: 26% { 99-22, ATs-A2s, KJs-K2s, Q2s+, J2s+, T2s+, 92s+, 82s+, 72s+, 62s+, 52s+, 42s+, 32s, ATo-A2o, KJo-K2o, Q5o+, J6o+, T6o+, 96o+, 86o+, 76o }
Hand 1: 33% { 88-22, A9s-A2s, K9s-K8s, QTs-Q8s, J8s+, T8s+, 98s, 87s, 76s, KTo, QTo+, JTo }
Hand 2: 41% (77)

Those are just generic LHE limping ranges I threw together. Again, doesn't change much even if you alter the ranges substantially so the sims are fairly robust.

Posted Feb 10, 2008 9:23am

Joe Tall
Founder
Quad Deuces
1537 posts
Joined 11/06

I found 46% to be the highest, you have 40.6% here. But we are getting nitty with hot/cold equity.

For Hold'em, I was sure 77 was compareable, yes, and 77 is completely debatable, and I feel there will be times I raise it and times I don't. I would need good reads and surely I would raise after on limper and a SB completion.

I can say, there can be times I'd raise AAJc5c but for the purpose of the example, this wasn't one of them. It's pure variance decision as I feel you are around 37%, OOP on avg, which is neutral EV. It comes down to how you want to play postflop and a small pot is going to force your opponents to make mistakes in a split game on a favorable flop for you. Especially with a hand that plays just better than mediocre in mostly one direction in O8. This is theory of poker, I'd rather have my opponents make the mistakes postflop in a small pot.

Posted Feb 10, 2008 10:31am

DonkeyOnTilt
Deuce High
21 posts
Joined 04/08

Ipod version is busto. Paging Rob!

Posted Jul 3, 2008 1:10am

Ebinsugewa
Deuce High
5 posts
Joined 01/08

The extra minute and a half is f***ing brilliant.

Posted Jul 10, 2008 7:03am

Entity
Founder
Quad Deuces
2044 posts
Joined 11/06

Ipod version is busto. Paging Rob!


I don't have my iPod on me right now, but I just reproduced it and uploaded it and it seems to play back now. Let me know if there are still issues.

Rob

Posted Jul 10, 2008 7:28am