18orbetter
71 posts
Joined 07/2010
One of the best vids I've ever seen online (at least for me at the moment). I guess I'm in the state of play where I play kind of ok exploitatively but don't think hard enough in my own range, and until now I didn't fully understand it, so thanks guys, awesome episode, keep it up!
One thing I may be interested in (in the thread or even future videos maybe) is the 'how' of these procedures. So e.g. when you have a certain scenario and a certain board, how can you analytically/mathematically decide what or how you should play in that situation?
Thanks a lot once again, great series so far.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
gonores
15 posts
Joined 01/2009
One thing I may be interested in (in the thread or even future videos maybe) is the 'how' of these procedures. So e.g. when you have a certain scenario and a certain board, how can you analytically/mathematically decide what or how you should play in that situation?
I'm actually trying to make arrangements to make a series on exactly this (with someone who knows GTO framework better than me). I can't promise it will come to fruition, because it seems like a huge undertaking, but I do think this is really important, and I'd like to create something down that pathway.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
JacksonTran
48 posts
Joined 02/2008
18orbetter
71 posts
Joined 07/2010
dmyers1166
9 posts
Joined 07/2009
I'm always thinking about this stuff away from the table so it's very helpful to hear the thoughts of fellow mid-high limit live players. This is a fantastic vid. Thanks guys.
+1000, exactly what I do away from the table. Really great concept for future consideration.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
aaahshoveit
697 posts
Joined 09/2008
Time Link to 00:13:20
Hi, I was just wondering, you guys said you'd fold 77 here but would you not peel the flop in an attempt to spike a 7 given that there should be good implied odds there if we do hit since our opponents range is so strong or do you think overall, given the large number of times we don't improve and the few times we hit but our opponent checks back the turn or has a better set or rivers us, that it's probably a losing play?
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
DeathDonkey
5229 posts
Joined 11/2006
I don't think we are getting nearly the right price to just try and hit a 22:1 shot, also he can re-suck sometimes or have us dead on the flop non zero, so its not like its pure +implied odds
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
aaahshoveit
697 posts
Joined 09/2008
pasita
389 posts
Joined 09/2009
More of this, please.
If I'd change something, stick to one scenario with different flops for a while, or create a flop and look at it in different scenarios (like you did with the first action flop).
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
JaneTheHot
129 posts
Joined 07/2007
Time Link to 00:36:31
I am not sure if 44 is a good call on such board. Especially since you said you would call on flop and turn and then decide on the riv. I feel like we are creating a horrible situation for ourselves. The board will almost always be unfavorable in terms of what can and what actually did hit on both the turn and river.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
UusAlgus
11 posts
Joined 06/2011