Home → Poker Videos → Elephant Tamer → Episode Seven
A tour de force of the little and the small: BigBadBabar and pygmyhero bring you an excellent primer to microstakes Limit Hold'em. Biweekly.
Subscribe to this Series
BigBadBabar and PygmyHero return for your enjoyment. This week Pygmy plays while BigBadBabar sweats 2-tables of $2/4 LHE.
Posted 8 months ago
Mid Stakes,
60 min long
Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.
Home → Poker Videos → Elephant Tamer → Episode Seven
mikefut
1327 posts
Joined 03/08
Good stuff. Discussion on checking street aggression for evaluating thin flop peels is gold. It sounds like such a basic concept, yet is not something I do with any regularity and seemingly need to really start doing.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
mikefut
1327 posts
Joined 03/08
[timestamp got eaten when I edited: 20:39]
Is this DC's own Slide making an appearance?
Kind of a gross spot with KQo in a capped pot. Equity is not helped by the fact that any A has a gutterball and there is a FD on the board. With the pot so huge, I guess we have to peel but I hate our hand here.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
mikefut
1327 posts
Joined 03/08
A7s seems somewhat close against a lagtag's HJ opening range. What's the worst suited ace you 3bet here? I'm pretty sure I fold A7s as well, but A8s, A9s is starting to feel like a 3!.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Taoism
581 posts
Joined 10/09
Regarding the AJo hand, is there any merit to check/calling the turn? You have A high and a double gutter. I think you're 50/50 against a range of pairs and gutshots. Any pair that called the flop is calling again on the turn, and you have a blocker to the gutshots and the J
against flushes. A villain with a draw might also be willing to fire the turn but not the river so you can get to showdown against them for just 1 bet.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Then I think you're going to be pleasantly surprised by the number of guys who have non-zero aggression stats on the flop and turn and then ~0 on the river. There are other patterns, but that's probably one of the more prominent / easy to exploit ones.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Yep! But I believe it's actually SIide (capital "I").
I agree with you on the rest of the hand.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Yeah, I agree it's close. I would have popped ATs and probably folded lower. Not that A7s-A9s are the same hand, but I kind of feel like I should tend to play them the same a lot of the time (here, but not in all spots). When he has two big cards my side card is lower than either of his cards whether it's a 7 or 9, so I'm really only gaining significantly on a small portion of his PP range (when I pick up a second OC to his hand).
That said there's definitely an argument for the 3! He tanked PF - I'm not sure if that should affect my decision (i.e., if he has a hand he needs to think about it's because he's making a r/f decision, not because he's considering LRR-ing a monster). Also, to be honest I'm not sure if I noticed at the time that UTG was sitting out and we were dealt 5 handed.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Yeah, I know what you're saying. But I do think he has some hands that peel once and fold here UI, which I don't want to give them a free shot at 6+ outs. Also there is now a BDFD that I want to charge.
Also we'd be barreling often here after 3-betting PF. I really have one of the weakest hands in my range (KJ being the other) - almost everything else I 3! here is just value betting him to death.
Lastly I agree that some people will not pull the trigger on the river - that's part of the reason I think this river is a x/f. But keep in mind that when you check the turn AND river you're showing more weakness than the line I took, which tends to embolden your opponent. In other words, I think there might be a greater chance you get barreled off when you check the turn than when I take the line I took.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
One thing I'd like to add to how I played this AJs hand:
The same villain 3-bet me here with 97s and then barreled off UI.
Incidentally, I held AJs in that hand as well. Please do not confuse either of these with the AJo hand I raised and folded to a cap! The name of this episode probably should have been changed to, 'how to get dealt AJ a lot.'
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
cetchmoh
1 posts
Joined 08/08
J4o - Second Pair. Why is this a fold?
Unraised pot, 3 handed. Isn't our equity way too high?
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BusinessGypsy
1753 posts
Joined 11/08
Good vid as always guys.
---
I agree. I was surprised you folded.
---
22 in the sb. One limper, we complete sb, bb checks, flop KK4 again and we x/f? Neither of you mention one word about this hand.
---
K
---
Hero 75o in BB, UTG opens, Flop 743rb, Hero x/r and we get 3-bet.
If we think villain is 3betting the flop with overs, should we call the river when he bets both big streets?
If we cap and lead, if we're raised on the turn we have equity to call and spike verses a probable overpair (and avoid folding to a FSDR), folding the river UI.
Do you think playing the hand in a way that has us fold is bad here considering his UTG open?
---
66 on right at 29:00. We open, the btn cc's, BB calls. We fold to a flop x/r from the BB (lagtaggy stats) on a A22 board after the btn folds to our cbet. The BB is getting 15:4 on a flop x/r here. Could you talk about this spot a bit more? How strong does our PP/hand need to be here before you continue?
---
K9cc on right 29:15.
Why are we calling the turn here planning to fold the river UI? This doesn't sound like a great plan to me here.
---
I like the turn semi-bluff with T8o.
gg
ciao
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
SIide
849 posts
Joined 12/08
I can confirm this. I find it interesting that from your table selecting you decided to sit at a table with a DC member on your left.
This confused me a bit as well. The way you two discussed it, it sounded as though you were calling hoping he checks the river back with A high which doesn't make sense with K high.
Maybe you were considering Ch/Calling the river unimproved thinking he would polarize his range to bluffs and good pairs? That seems a little out there though. Maybe you were hoping he would check back some worse missed draws as well and our hand would be good occasionally?
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BigBadBabar
2648 posts
Joined 03/07
agree, i definitely think a fold would be defensible here, and if we had a nice diamond in our hand i think we'd all be more happy calling, so it has to be pretty close
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BigBadBabar
2648 posts
Joined 03/07
it would really depend on the guy for me
there are some guys i always 3bet a5s+ vs here. vs an "unknown" lagtag i think a8s+ always would be reasonable, adding in more based on table dynamic, our image, if he's foldy post, etc
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BigBadBabar
2648 posts
Joined 03/07
i think because i double barrel often, and there are actually a fair number of worse hands than ours that have to call, that i'd prefer to put the bet in myself here. i also think checkcalling gives up some info about our type of hand, which i'm loath to do, esp oop
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BigBadBabar
2648 posts
Joined 03/07
for me, the fact that the hand is unraised means there's a very small pot that we are going to be trying to win, if we stay in, and we could very possibly face a bet on every street on a rapidly worsening board. we don't know if we're ahead or behind, if he's valuebetting or bluffing, and we get put into tons of really uncomfortable spots. in general when you are going to get put in tons of tough spots in a tiny pot, folding the flop is okay, imo. i guess even though it's a dry board i consider it somewhat akin to a RIO spot. there's also a guy left to act behind us.
also, our 'equity' is kind of a misleading term here. i'd consider it more of a wa/wb spot with emphasis on the wb. or, if it is wa, it's still going to be silly to call a bunch of bets. let me give a counterexample. suppose we had QQ here (misclick pf). he leads out. our equity might be very good but i don't think that means we should raise. does that make sense? it's not like we have a drawing hand or whatever. i'm not sure if i'm explaining it well. maybe pyg can chime in if my answer is unclear.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BigBadBabar
2648 posts
Joined 03/07
22 - i think leading the flop, or raising pf, are playable, or folding pf as well tbh. one can probably make the argument that if we're not stabbing more post that we should be folding more pre
KQo - i believe pyg and i discuss that some and we came down on different sides of the argument. pretty classic spot to be sure
75o - i tend to think if someone is capable of 3betting overs that they're capable of barreling off ui as well. i am not sure i want to cap and lead, call a turn raise, then cf a riv in a huge pot. we get a lot of expensive information and probably can hero fold with good certainty, but i'd rather uncertainly get to sd for a much cheaper price and keep a lot of bluffs in his range
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BigBadBabar
2648 posts
Joined 03/07
i think i speak for pyg when i say that who's on our right is more important than who's on our left
i'll let pyg chime in as well cuz he was seat selecting for this one
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
I do think raising would be reasonable here. I think in the vid I even kind of mentioned that I'd almost rather have 54 (smaller kicker) so I could feel 'better' about the fold.
I kind of made a compound decision here based on a lot of small factors:
-the pot is tiny
-I think this hand has RIO
-donker can have me crushed
-player behind me can have me crushed
-if I am currenly outkicking villain I will still get chopped by the river some non negligible and important % of the time
-I didn't think SB was the type of player who would donk a lot of airballs here
Lastly, there is something about this specific situation (i.e., this pot, this lineup of opponents, the bet timing, etc.) that I cannot quite articulate that made me feel uneasy. You can call it intuition or whatever, but I just didn't feel like my hand was good and I made a play based on that feeling.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Time stamp?
To answer generally, this isn't really a board I'm that excited about continuing on. You don't have nearly as much fold equity as on a K44 board (where I would like leading out more and would also bluff from time to time), which I think is important given the 3 hidden outs my opponent picked up on this flop.
A lot of the other stuff I would say I probably already said in the J4 hand - small pot, RIO, etc.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
To be honest I don't really have much to add to what I said in the video - small pot, villain who I think is playing straightforwardly and passively. There are a not insubstantial number of players who I would NOT give up against here, but this guy is not one of them.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Time stamp so I can review and see what stats were available to me at the time? Edited to add: nevermind - I found it while reviewing another hand
I didn't really get to finish this thought because of the hand on the other table and the tech problems on BBB's end. I did mention overcards but I didn't mean to imply that was ALL I felt he could have here. Villain had aggressive looking stats, and had seemed aggressive to that point, so I felt he could have some better hands and some worse hands.
Against that range and in the absence of more/better information I am pretty inclined to showdown with a hand like TP and because the board came good for us.
I would not take a line that involved folding without a decent read and/or the board coming pretty ugly.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
In all of these situations I think where I differ from the lines your post suggests/implies is that I made opponent and situation specific adjustments based on what information I did and did not have at the time.
In this case I just don't think I'm getting bluff check/raised here almost ever. I have seen no hands leading me to believe villain is capable of that type of play, have no past history indicating he would target me with such a play, and it doesn't jive with his stats.
If you are reading the situation differently I would be interested to hear what factors are leading you to that conclusion.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
I think some of the comments on this hand are being influenced by the fact that I was shown ace high. I felt he would check back a LOT of hands on the river, better and worse. Because of this I felt I could fold the river in good conscience if he bet, but also realize my K high showdown equity against some of his range - remember he opened the button so he has a lot of non-SD-able hands here that might give up.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Let's just all be honest about this hand - I owned.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
I think it just sounded that way because villain showed ace high and then we moved on to another hand.
Nope, I agree with you - that's too optimistic.
Yep.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
To be honest, it sounds like you took a little bit of offense to the fact that I sat at 'your' table. You shouldn't - it's nothing personal. Just off the top of my head I have knowingly played against the following DC members, all of whom I have a lot of respect for:
BigBadBabar
fnupple
HLS2k6
OnTheRail15
I know I've also sat with many other DC members. And I'm sure I've sat with many others who I didn't know were/are DC members. From a practical standpoint I cannot feasibly avoid all DC members (or even all the ones I know of).
Additionally, being a DC member does not confer the ability to play good poker. I realize you might take umbrage at this, but I had never played with you before and I do NOT have to assume you will play well before sitting with you. Again, this is nothing personal - I certainly had no expectation that you would be bad and you seemed to play fine for the few hands I saw. I'm just saying that I do not tend to make assumptions about DC members or regs - I prefer to play against them and form my own opinion. Many regs (even those that beat the game) are decent but still play in ways that I consider exploitable. And I'm sure they feel the same way about me.
I hope you can understand my attitude and find it fair and logical. I cannot emphasize enough that this has nothing to do with you. If I can get a good seat that has the unfortunate side-effect of giving up position to a good player I cannot think of anyone (the good player) who would stop me from sitting. In fact the only way I would not sit is if I could find an even better spot elsewhere.
Which leads me to my last point - as BBB pointed out, if I'm sitting to the immediate left of a fish and you're to my left, I'm not the one with a bad seat - you are.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
SIide
849 posts
Joined 12/08
No offense taken at all. The comment was just more poking a little bit of fun at the fact that you manage to sit down in 2-3 of tougher $2-$4 games that exist on stars (on average) while "game selecting" during the video.
This is not a knock on your game selecting abilities, I know it can be difficult trying to find good games at a level your not familiar with where you are more forced into the "sit and see" approach.
This is very true. I think you actually replaced the fish I was targeting when you sat down. If you watch the video, you'll notice I quit the table slightly before you do.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Yeah, that's all fair - I'll admit that I was a bit surprised the games I ended up in weren't better. Even though it's near the end of the year and many regs are grinding, when I have been playing I've regularly been finding games I consider pretty phenomenal. Certainly much better than the games in this video.
And of course you're right - I mean, it's evident from how few hands I had on everyone I sat with throughout that I don't know most of the regs in the game. At most I recognize people's names just from what I know/remember/have heard from other people.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
You know, I was thinking about this a bit more the other day. If I can get a good seat to the left of a fish I think the only player having a seat to my left that should make me get up is Entity. I'm just guessing because he's the person who's thought most about my game (besides me I hope), but also because, WTF AM I DOING AT A PLO TABLE!?!?
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Entity
Founder
5991 posts
Joined 11/06
I actually LOL'd.
Nice thoughts on seat selection, though.
Rob
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Boomer
1356 posts
Joined 06/07
Yes but if you're out of position on Rob you can check raise him on the river followed by a lap of the room
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
motienko
1853 posts
Joined 03/08
Hi Guys,
If the BB would have called this turn raise, Would you bet most rivers or give up on some? I would think a 4 or a 7 might be bad cards to bet since Ace high and K highs would call but a J could be good if the villian has 22,33,55,66. I suppose I would barrell pretty much any other card.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
I think you're spot on here. On the river there'd be 8 BB in the pot so there's a lot of incentive for me to fire the last shell even on baby cards. Yeah his A/K high might call, but I'm repping a pair/bigger hand and they would all vbet on those blanks.
Posted 8 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Rockyhill
5 posts
Joined 09/09
Raise?
We can expect to fold out <mpgk and he gets here with his whole pair range plus a lot of bluffs. We could easily be inducing.
edit: I edited and my time link disappeared. Talking about 4:44, the AJ hand that we 3bet pre from the sb that went b/c b/c c/c on QT8xx
Posted 4 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
I'm not sure I understand your comment here. Are you suggesting we should turn AJ into a bluff and x/r the river after having the lead the whole hand? If so, I'll say that I don't like it.
My line looks super weird so I'd expect to be called often. Also, I said I thought his bet was a value bet (which is why I wanted to fold), NOT a bluff, so that means when he bets and I x/r his range is on the stronger side. But even if I'm wrong about this and he has a bluff I gain NOTHING by raising since he folds worse (it'd be better to call in that spot).
The play would hinge on getting him to fold a lot of pairs (which I think is what you're saying), but again - I just don't think it's going to happen.
Posted 4 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
joethrock
37 posts
Joined 04/10
you guys were getting distracted a little bit and it seems that you had started to miss some of the action on the left table. The hand that you opened AdJd and got 3b by 901ismycode and then capped by w@iting room it appears you failed to realize that 901ismycode is 3betting you w/ 97s which i think is very note worthy and the cap was AQo. Now since waiting room has 3b or capped in 3 pots you have been in i think you should have just noticed that he 3b slide w/ A9s mp vs co and slide led turn w/ tpgk and flush draw instead of c/r. I also would have called on the right hand table and prob. lost a ton of the time, but this player seems weird to me.
I also notice that your style of play seems strange in that you almost never call raises in pos. w/ strong hands. I see some pots were you are debating on 3b and then you fold. Is it illegal for you to ever call?
Posted 3 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
BigBadBabar
2648 posts
Joined 03/07
i think you raise some good points about a lot of the stuff that was going on. the 3bet with 97s is definitely noteworthy, and the guy leading the turn instead of checkraising is also useful.
as far as calling a raise first in (coldcalling), that's not something that is considered very good of a play in limit holdem. it's much more viable in no limit, where if you flop a big hand with whatever you coldcalled (pocket pair, suited connector, etc), you have big implied odds and can potentially stack the opener if he has an overpair or flops tptk or something.
in limit holdem, implied odds go down, since you can't stack someone. making a hand and winning at showdown, or winning before showdown - those things go up in value. a problem with coldcalling a middle range of hands that don't seem instantly strong enough to 3bet (88, ATo, K9s, whatever), is that your opponents will generally figure out that that's the kind of hand you have, and they'll be able to play pretty well against you. so in general you want to be 3betting or folding next in after someone opens the pot. the 3betting is when you think you have about as strong a hand as him, or stronger, or you think you can make him fold postflop, or you want to knock out the guys behind and buy the button, etc etc.
Posted 3 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
PygmyHero
4234 posts
Joined 08/07
Hi there,
I tried to look a bit before and after the time stamp but I can't seem to locate the hand you're talking about. If you're satisfied with BBB's response we can leave it there. If you'd like to hear from me (which is certainly reasonable as I was driving) I'll try again - can you check the time stamp for me? ty
I assume the hand on the right you're talking about is where I fold a weak Ax? Basically I just don't see anything I'm beating - why would he raise A6/A7 there? And I doubt this player is bluffing. I don't really have much further justification - it was partly a game flow thing. I do NOT make a habit of folding TP, nor do I encourage that.
I'm interested in your last comment - could you cite some hands for me to take a look at and comment on?
Posted 3 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote