Poker Video: MTT/SNG by Ansky (High Stakes)

WSOP 2011 Review: Episode Five

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

WSOP 2011 Review: Episode Five by Ansky

Next on the WSOP block, Ansky, complete with hands from the main event and appearances from Durrrrrrr and Daniel Negreanu.

About WSOP 2011 Review Subscribe to

DC Producers from all backgrounds review their play at the 2011 WSOP including big tournaments, big hands, and bad beats.

Tags

wsop 2011 review ipod friendly high stakes wsop mtt ansky

Video Details

  • Game: mttsng
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 62 minutes long
  • Posted 5 months ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for WSOP 2011 Review: Episode Five

DiggerTheDog

Avatar for DiggerTheDog

697 posts
Joined 09/2008

thanks dani - made my week seeing this..........was posted now I get to watch!
sick.

Posted 9 months ago

a blind hippo

Avatar for a blind hippo

203 posts
Joined 10/2010

was some good discussion bout this hand on twoplustwo, like your analysis in the video!

Posted 9 months ago

DiggerTheDog

Avatar for DiggerTheDog

697 posts
Joined 09/2008

Re: patti and the 'karma' comment.

I thought of the 2M2M reunion vid of PA vs Krantz - when Brian was asked - what do I think about people who think Karma is serious ( or words to that effect)? They're f'ing retarded.

Posted 9 months ago

beepokerking

Avatar for beepokerking

13 posts
Joined 07/2010

Liked the video good work. For the video series i'd like to see you crush 5/10 6max on stars please

Posted 9 months ago

oneillsurfer03

Avatar for oneillsurfer03

1414 posts
Joined 07/2008

dani ty for vid . But i also spent the summer in Vegas and have a ridiculous story about a dealer. plyn 2/5 at Venetian. I'm playing on relatively short money bc of my ftp roll being gone. so got like 8k roll. I'm sitting with 1.2k. so to reduce variance i ask about doing business in a hand. IN a previous hand I got in an argument with a dealer bc he declared my hand dead bc he didnt know i was still in the hand for a ridiculous reason so i am giving him hell.

So a few hands later same dealer i get AA aipf vs a dealer that also plays at the casino. The other dealer/player has QQ and i say hey dealer wait dont put out the flop we are making a deal. Now i have done this in bigger pots multilple times at the venetian all summer, made deals etc. The dealer for some reason says no you cant and make I him hold on while we discuss deal . So the player and i agree he takes back 200 i get 1k and while this is happening the dealer deals without us tellin him to and it comes Q high and the other guy goes back on the deal.

The floor rules that the deal wasn't official before the board ran out and he ships the whole Pot w/ top set. Fucking ridiculous. I still kept playing there and i win a1.8k pot with same dealer about a week later and make about 2.4k in his shift at our table and refused to tip him one dollar and continued to berate him. I literally look at him at one say i promise to not tip you any time you deal for me the rest of summer. I mean bc he doesn't understand ppl can do business if they so choose costs me 1.2k. awesome

Posted 9 months ago

jaimestaples

Avatar for jaimestaples

1398 posts
Joined 08/2010

Time Link to 00:21:47

Love it so far ansky!
Was your standard 850 in the six max or did it vary from utg to sb? How do you feel about varying open sizes online in full ring as well as six max tourneys, and how would stack depth change that strategy from level to level? I was kind of thinking about it like ex. 2.5x utg and 2x otb. But as stacks get shorter and shorter i would think you want it as small as possible from utg with even a semi reasonable range. Its something im trying to figure out in my head for sure, i think early it makes sence but not so much post antes. Thoughts would be much appreciated.

Posted 9 months ago

Ansky

Avatar for Ansky

347 posts
Joined 08/2009

I'd try to not have rigid guidelines. Some tables you just want to be able to raise more, or less, based on other stacks, how people play, ante size, etc.

Posted 9 months ago

jaimestaples

Avatar for jaimestaples

1398 posts
Joined 08/2010

I'd try to not have rigid guidelines. Some tables you just want to be able to raise more, or less, based on other stacks, how people play, ante size, etc.


More or less situational like everything else in mtt's i guess haha Smile. Thanks for the content ansky, I love your stuff and would love more but i understand that your a busy man.

Posted 9 months ago

DiggerTheDog

Avatar for DiggerTheDog

697 posts
Joined 09/2008

+1
any stuff from you is great Ansky.
PLO/ HSNL 6M/HU - whatever imo

Posted 9 months ago

betgo

Avatar for betgo

23 posts
Joined 11/2010

Seems like this is an error that this is listed under micro/small stakes.

Posted 4 months ago

xhgrising

Avatar for xhgrising

41 posts
Joined 03/2008

Time Link to 00:40:00

I think suitedness adds a pretty significant amount of value to your rundown hands in multiway pots, because the times you flop the nuts and get it in vs. the same hand, you're almost always going to have backdoor flushdraw freerolls in big pots. Even vs. other hands you get it in against on boards where you have the nuts, like nut flush draws or sets+flush draws, you'll have blockers a pretty high percentage of the time, or even end up dominating a combo draw when you flop a T-high flush draw and a straight. Obviously not huge considerations, I just think T865ds is like vastly more playable there than T865r obviously, so being double-suited is hardly irrelevant.

Posted 4 months ago

Ansky

Avatar for Ansky

347 posts
Joined 08/2009

I think suitedness adds a pretty significant amount of value to your rundown hands in multiway pots, because the times you flop the nuts and get it in vs. the same hand, you're almost always going to have backdoor flushdraw freerolls in big pots. Even vs. other hands you get it in against on boards where you have the nuts, like nut flush draws or sets+flush draws, you'll have blockers a pretty high percentage of the time, or even end up dominating a combo draw when you flop a T-high flush draw and a straight. Obviously not huge considerations, I just think T865ds is like vastly more playable there than T865r obviously, so being double-suited is hardly irrelevant.



I mean you are right, equity is equity, and it's always better to have the chance to have a live FD, or to block your opponents outs when he has a higher draw. I am just saying though, in a 3b pot flopping a gutter and fd is worth something when it is hu or 3 way, but 6 way in a single raised pot, it is worth basically nothing.

Posted 4 months ago

xhgrising

Avatar for xhgrising

41 posts
Joined 03/2008

I mean you are right, equity is equity, and it's always better to have the chance to have a live FD, or to block your opponents outs when he has a higher draw. I am just saying though, in a 3b pot flopping a gutter and fd is worth something when it is hu or 3 way, but 6 way in a single raised pot, it is worth basically nothing.



Well yeah, obviously your marginal flops are going to go down in value 6-ways, but that's going to be the case with lots of hands you'd play there. You're really not going to get a ton of money in good without the nuts anyway, though. I know that your point is that low flush draws suck 6 ways and you're going to have to fold tons of flops so it's super marginal. I guess what I'm really asking is: there's a pretty big difference between T865ds and T865r there, right? Or are our suits worth so little that it's irrelevant?

Posted 4 months ago

Ansky

Avatar for Ansky

347 posts
Joined 08/2009

Well yeah, obviously your marginal flops are going to go down in value 6-ways, but that's going to be the case with lots of hands you'd play there. You're really not going to get a ton of money in good without the nuts anyway, though. I know that your point is that low flush draws suck 6 ways and you're going to have to fold tons of flops so it's super marginal. I guess what I'm really asking is: there's a pretty big difference between T865ds and T865r there, right? Or are our suits worth so little that it's irrelevant?




Well, this is certainly not the metric by which everything ought to be judged, but intuitively if I had the option of calling or folding with both, and not 3betting, I'd call the DS and fold the SS.

Posted 4 months ago



HomePoker Videos → WSOP 2011 Review → Episode Five