Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Gman (Mid Stakes)

Real Life: Mid Stakes HUNL Grinder: Episode Four

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Real Life: Mid Stakes HUNL Grinder: Episode Four by Gman

Gman and his student Tony talk shop in the HEM hand replayer. They review various HH from Tony's recent play.

About Real Life: Mid Stakes HUNL Grinder Subscribe to

Gman and protégé get paired up to go heads up. Follow them on their quest through the mid-stakes.

Tags

gman real life mshu grinder hh review hand replayer ipod friendly

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 66 minutes long
  • Posted over 2 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Real Life: Mid Stakes HUNL Grinder: Episode Four

inavacuum

Avatar for inavacuum

907 posts
Joined 04/2008

I think you'll find it's Celtic who are shite.

/hijack.

Posted over 2 years ago

danndann1

Avatar for danndann1

297 posts
Joined 05/2008

Time Link to 00:24:53

do you think checking turn to show weaknesss and to let him bluff his floats or even turn his medium pps into a bluff has any merit in the spot?

Posted over 2 years ago

HypoxiaDC

Avatar for HypoxiaDC

383 posts
Joined 01/2009

Review of hand histories in this format is very very useful. Thank you to Tony for a well considered selection of hands. Gman, I think you pitched the level of analysis just right for your intended audience (on the basis that my level of understanding is a decent approximation of average for this level) ie not too deep or too superficial.

More like this please.

Hypoxia

Posted over 2 years ago

andymckenzie

Avatar for andymckenzie

31 posts
Joined 09/2008

do you think checking turn to show weaknesss and to let him bluff his floats or even turn his medium pps into a bluff has any merit in the spot?



My take on this is yes it has merit, but only if you have a pretty clear read that he is floating a tonne. To expect him to turn medium pps into a bluff would require an even more specific read. Against this player I had the opposite read - I didn't expect him to be floating almost ever here and I'd expect him to try and take showdown with a pocket pair. Again I think it would take some fairly unusual circumstances for the turn not to be a bet.

Posted over 2 years ago

Gman

Avatar for Gman

278 posts
Joined 10/2008

do you think checking turn to show weaknesss and to let him bluff his floats or even turn his medium pps into a bluff has any merit in the spot?



As I mentioned, if we suspect he floated on this texture or was going to turn a made hand into a bluff or incorrectly bet it for whatever reason, both of which are unlikely from most reasonable opponents, then yes checking would be best.

Posted over 2 years ago

dispatch3d

Avatar for dispatch3d

61 posts
Joined 12/2007

that hand with 45o on AJ2r, should that be raised preflop against a guy who flats 60% of raises and check calls 90% of flops?

Posted over 2 years ago

dispatch3d

Avatar for dispatch3d

61 posts
Joined 12/2007

trentcroad

Avatar for trentcroad

13 posts
Joined 10/2008

NoWayFolding

Avatar for NoWayFolding

3603 posts
Joined 03/2008

Time Link to 00:14:46

Seems like this would be an absolutely awesome spot to bet turn to induce a c/r.

Posted over 2 years ago

andymckenzie

Avatar for andymckenzie

31 posts
Joined 09/2008

that hand with 45o on AJ2r, should that be raised preflop against a guy who flats 60% of raises and check calls 90% of flops?



Yeah good point, we talked in the first episode about how vs this player I like to tighten up preflop to make my life easier. Obviously another viable counter strategy is betting the turn with a higher frequency although this spot was not ideal.

Posted over 2 years ago

andymckenzie

Avatar for andymckenzie

31 posts
Joined 09/2008

what do you think of blockbetting like $40-$50?



The reason I don't like doing this is because when they raise I end up levelling myself into calling too often thinking the small bet size has induced a bluff raise. If you don't have that issue with introducing another variable then I guess good if you think he will call a lot more often with his 1 pair hands.

Posted over 2 years ago

Gman

Avatar for Gman

278 posts
Joined 10/2008

what do you think of blockbetting like $40-$50?



Unless your opponent plays uberpredictably, not really a fan of this or block betting in general. But this is mostly a function of me rarely playing players who are uberpredictable.

Posted over 2 years ago

Gman

Avatar for Gman

278 posts
Joined 10/2008

Gman

Avatar for Gman

278 posts
Joined 10/2008

Seems like this would be an absolutely awesome spot to bet turn to induce a c/r.



I'm lost. Are you talking about betting 3rd pair no kicker to induce a turn c/r on that texture? If so, that is beyond spewy.

Posted over 2 years ago

PureEnergy8

Avatar for PureEnergy8

30 posts
Joined 07/2008

I think you'll find it's Celtic who are shite.

/hijack.


Confirmed 2-1 to the mighty gers with half a team missing Smile

Posted over 2 years ago

simpleasspie

Avatar for simpleasspie

404 posts
Joined 05/2009

The first hand you talked about was Q2 of spades on a 872, you had a flushdraw: you said the best play on the turn if you bet/call the flop would be to call again - i have a question bout that: by ch/r the flop opponent represents a narrow value range, thout any dynamic of course, 9combos of sets + 3 combos of 87 and probably some amount of good 8x - not sure how much though; so id think the best play on the turn is to shove (not on every card obv., but on the blanks kinda) whether you have Q2 of spades, 66, or you take the same line on the flop with nines and the turn is a K - youre often ahead and villain probably is not gonna fire 3rd barrel so you just give him up his pot-equity

Posted over 2 years ago



HomePoker Videos → Real Life: Mid Stakes HUNL Grinder → Episode Four