Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by sthief09 (Micro/Small Stakes)

File with all the ranges (overwrite or append to the conditions.txt file in PR folder):
http://rcpt.yousendit.com/716858310/0d3382ebf2ab6bca91107ac741d8ad3d

Configuration file with the model for this:
http://rcpt.yousendit.com/716858578/d2638e946ddee3ceda146eec97227baa

Thanks for the links.
Really love the way you break all this down into something that can be taken to the tables - no more leaking $ 2-barrelling fish on Axx (which is kind of dumb when you think about it but I couldn't help hoping they would fold 2nd pairs).

I do think that if we make the decision trees any more complicated than those you have here, then the chances of either a user input error or becoming too focused on a particular opponent strategy might dilute the usefulness of results. Or maybe I'm just too much of a noob at all this.

Good video Josh , 2nd half went into to much dept for my liking but i really enjoyed the first half showing how to compare differnt turn cards on differnt baords , you make poker-razor look easy to use but when i try i often get lost , i think it would be awesome if members could send you some hands and you showed how to use poker-razor to review those hands.

With the way the series seems to be going youl be using the tool to get into more long term theory dicussion (which is great) rather than showing the basics of what we can use this tool for when reviewing hands.

Thats just my thoughts

Very interesting video and great concept its just soooo tedious and boring getting through the whole number crunching thing. Maybe its just because I have ADD (i really do) lol

Good video Josh , 2nd half went into to much dept for my liking but i really enjoyed the first half showing how to compare differnt turn cards on differnt baords , you make poker-razor look easy to use but when i try i often get lost , i think it would be awesome if members could send you some hands and you showed how to use poker-razor to review those hands.

With the way the series seems to be going youl be using the tool to get into more long term theory dicussion (which is great) rather than showing the basics of what we can use this tool for when reviewing hands.

Thats just my thoughts

I just feel like the actual Pokerazor stuff is on the boring side. I'll always go through the actual modeling of the hand, and I think that should show you the basics of it. Once you start playing around with it, I think it's pretty intuitive. If you need help, please feel free to ask.

Personally, I think the more interesting stuff is the findings. I have some pretty surprising results in the episode that's out today. If you watch that, I'd like to hear what you think of the format.

Very interesting video and great concept its just soooo tedious and boring getting through the whole number crunching thing. Maybe its just because I have ADD (i really do) lol

The next one flows a bit better and involves less Pokerazor time, so I think it's more watchable.

I really like the series and i am learning a lot.
But today i wanted to download your files with ranges and configuration files but i get the message "This file has expired." Can you please post them again? Thanks

I really like the series and i am learning a lot.
But today i wanted to download your files with ranges and configuration files but i get the message "This file has expired." Can you please post them again? Thanks

here you go. this contains the configuration files and the conditions.txt file that contains all the ranges I set, for episodes 3 and 5:

http://www.yousendit.com/download/Y1RxSkhlYSt0TWwzZUE9PQ

here you go. this contains the configuration files and the conditions.txt file that contains all the ranges I set, for episodes 3 and 5:

http://www.yousendit.com/download/Y1RxSkhlYSt0TWwzZUE9PQ

Unfortunately they expired once again. Would you please repost them? Thanks!

+1

this must be what einstein felt like when they brought the first atomic clock down from the airplane in the relativity experiments...i know that's a dorky analogy but this + prof plotkin are like poker proofs! i dunno what it is but i just love seeing some of these scenarios detailed in such an easy to visualize manner. its obv that we should barrel the K turn on 773 if you think about ranges, but the ability to compare the relative frequencies with ease to show exactly why it is profitable is a great tool for teaching and learning.

Please re-post the link ty Sthief09

Please re-post the link ty Sthief09

http://software.deucescracked.com/razors_edge_nlhe.rar

this must be what einstein felt like when they brought the first atomic clock down from the airplane in the relativity experiments...i know that's a dorky analogy but this + prof plotkin are like poker proofs! i dunno what it is but i just love seeing some of these scenarios detailed in such an easy to visualize manner. its obv that we should barrel the K turn on 773 if you think about ranges, but the ability to compare the relative frequencies with ease to show exactly why it is profitable is a great tool for teaching and learning.

whoa, thanks Steve!

Hosting the files on DC's server now so it won't expire. Josh, feel free to email/PM/AIM me if you need more stuff hosted, it's easy for me to do.

Rob

Hosting the files on DC's server now so it won't expire. Josh, feel free to email/PM/AIM me if you need more stuff hosted, it's easy for me to do.

Rob

Sweet, thanks Rob.

nm