This was very intructive.

When you talked about the river bet size /stack opponent and when we miss value was an excellent point which I will incorporate in my play of course.

Loved all others informations too, thanks

Messiah, I have also incorporated the Won $ WSF stat on my hud. I am still experimenting, but I think it gives good insight on how a person plays post flop. I personally have about a 44% W$WSF and am more agressive when I see there are orphaned pots. A typical set miner or big hand player is < 30%. Right now I feel if anyone is below 35% I believe them more post flop. Above 40% I am going to test them. Wonder if you ever used it or had opinions?

Funny you should bring this up. I honestly believe this is the #1 statistic players need to use when evaluating their own game. I use this 100% of the time with my students during our session reviews and when we talk about how they can begin improving their games. I also love the aspect of looking at WWSF from the position tab in Pokertracker.

I am not sure what to think of your analysis regarding using it in a HUD as a tool for decision making vs. opponents. The thing is, it takes a fairly large amount of hands to converge (player X could be running good and have 48+ % wwsf for a few K hands, and vise versa which all depends on sample sizes). I disagree that a "typical setminer" has a 30% WWSF. In my experience most "average TAGS" or I would say a typical/average 2+2er has a range of 35-39% over large samples. Just because a player is <35% does not necessarily equate to the fact that we should believe them more, it is more likely that said player just struggles postflop (especially on the turn and river).

Messiah you define supalag sir. Was a solid video, talking about the different stats was a good refresher. Although nothing too exciting came up, two hands I noticed are:

(19:05) T9s: Squeezing is cool. Squeezing a 12/5/1 shortstack? Not so much :P Postflop I think you missed value by not at least attempting to give villain some rope to donk off his stack(or improve his hand) by checking once out of position. He only has a PSB left and leading 2/3 pretty much eliminates the chance he shoves with air. Checking enables him to shove the hands he's calling your lead with and also his likely range(AK/AQ/KQ broadways) considering the flat call preflop.

(12:37) T8s: It might be close, but it seems pretty -ev to give up on the $5 pot w/ 2nd pair when villain has $7 behind and likely didn't hit the flop. I'd be inclined to just shove the flop- of course cry when he has Qx but profit when he likely folds(or shows up with) a worse hand.

Messiah you define supalag sir. Was a solid video, talking about the different stats was a good refresher. Although nothing too exciting came up, two hands I noticed are:

(19:05) T9s: Squeezing is cool. Squeezing a 12/5/1 shortstack? Not so much :P Postflop I think you missed value by not at least attempting to give villain some rope to donk off his stack(or improve his hand) by checking once out of position. He only has a PSB left and leading 2/3 pretty much eliminates the chance he shoves with air. Checking enables him to shove the hands he's calling your lead with and also his likely range(AK/AQ/KQ broadways) considering the flat call preflop.

Thank you for your kind words sir!

Yes, I agree that the better line may have been to check flop here, at the time I was think he would shove any pair (even lower than the paired 9s with that short of a stack which comprises of the majority % of his range - I think he shoves AK pre)

Flop - Turn - River aggression ?

Also explain more about the pokertracker stats Won$WSF%

Great video.

I have aggr. FACTOR by street in my HUD; do you think bet river % is better than river aggr factor in determening thin value/bluffing ranges at the river ?

The cold call % part is genious: but it will be obsolite when Pokertracker 3 comes with HUD on 3-bets.

So sad, i used to look forward to the pokertracker 3 release; after getting this info i am not looking forward anymore :)

i'd like to hear a little more on why you felt you had fold equity in the 3bet pot blind versus blind hand when you flop FD against opponents Top 2 pair. as opposed to when you flopped FD against the calling station. in both cases you felt villain had a piece of the flop.

thanks & great video...