Poker Video: Misc/Other by bellatrix (Micro/Small Stakes)

Math Attacks: Episode Seventeen

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Math Attacks: Episode Seventeen by bellatrix

Bellatrix has moved onto finite pot games, and we talk about mixing in bluffs.

About Math Attacks Subscribe to

Bellatrix takes you on a journey through The Mathematics of Poker by Bill Chen and Jerrod Ankenman, breaking down each chapter one at at time. Warning - if you haven't figured it out by now, there will be math!

Tags

bellatrix math attacks powerpoint theory ipod friendly classroom

Video Details

  • Game: other
  • Stakes: Micro/Small Stakes
  • 42 minutes long
  • Posted 6 months ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Math Attacks: Episode Seventeen

TazUltimate

Avatar for TazUltimate

Production Manager
1279 posts
Joined 01/2008

MyKQ

Avatar for MyKQ

84 posts
Joined 03/2010

In most poker games, and as the number of bets and raises allowed increase, don't you think it probably ok to revert to the "no-fold" strategy after the 3rd bet/raise is made ?

As it is unlikely that someone would "reraise/fold" (region between x4* and x3 is probably very small or non-existant for most players ... except for the most Math-attacks-savys or total retards), therefore, it would be incorrect to have any re-reraise-bluffs (region between y4# and y3*). The opposite can also be said.
In most games, I think the same can be said for the previous bets (x3* / x2 and y3# / y2*).
At micro stakes, I'm not even sure that there should be a "raise-bluff" region as most players are total showdown monkeys and incapable of "bet-folding".

Posted 10 months ago

bellatrix

Avatar for bellatrix

787 posts
Joined 12/2007

In most poker games, and as the number of bets and raises allowed increase, don't you think it probably ok to revert to the "no-fold" strategy after the 3rd bet/raise is made ?

As it is unlikely that someone would "reraise/fold" (region between x4* and x3 is probably very small or non-existant for most players ... except for the most Math-attacks-savys or total retards), therefore, it would be incorrect to have any re-reraise-bluffs (region between y4# and y3*). The opposite can also be said.
In most games, I think the same can be said for the previous bets (x3* / x2 and y3# / y2*).
At micro stakes, I'm not even sure that there should be a "raise-bluff" region as most players are total showdown monkeys and incapable of "bet-folding".



Emphatic YES. As you see in the value chapter next, you notice that we just get rid of those regions, because they are basically value-indifferent. They definitely provide very little profit, which we can certainly let go, because nobody plays optimally like that.

I just wanted to point out, that even in the theoretical realm it reraise/fold region is very small (I don't have the numbers in my head, but it was very small <1/20th). So the actual frequency of this happening is gonna be small.

Posted 10 months ago



HomePoker Videos → Math Attacks → Episode Seventeen