Stuffing the Penguin: Episode Six
Stuffing the Penguin: Episode Six
Coaching challenge Part 1/2. whitelime and pr1nnyraid each coach danzasmack at HU NLHE for 300 hands. Who can teach better? Loser has to perform karaoke.
tags: stuffing the penguin pr1nnyraid krantz whitelime danzasmack heads up hu nl no limit hold'em coaching challenge sweat session karaoke ipod friendly
This Series: whitelime vs. pr1nnyraid
Clash of the titans. whitelime and KRANTZ battle each other in a series of high-stakes, daring challenges designed to explore what it takes to move beyond solid winning TAG play into the mindset of an elite No-Limit player. Immerse yourself deep within their thought processes in whitelime's half, "Stuffing the Penguin," or KRANTZ's, "Lime Slicer."
Previous Video: Episode 2-4 Results | Next Video: Lime Slicer: Episode Six
Comments for Stuffing the Penguin: Episode Six
at 11:50... no wonder this site is called deuces cracked.. the deck was obv rigged with 2 'yellow' ducks there ;)
This was crazy coming from Jay's style to then play with emil - who has a very different approach to the game.
Thanks for letting me do this guys this was awesome.
This was crazy coming from Jay's style to then play with emil - who has a very different approach to the game.
Thanks for letting me do this guys this was awesome.
but it's always great to hear that to be successful in poker there is no one style.
at 11:50... no wonder this site is called deuces cracked.. the deck was obv rigged with 2 'yellow' ducks there ;)
Haha I know what happened, his card mod is a bit messed up and the little miniature cards that are used for the graphical hand history are the wrong suits.
-DeathDonkey
This was crazy coming from Jay's style to then play with emil - who has a very different approach to the game.
Thanks for letting me do this guys this was awesome.
but it's always great to hear that to be successful in poker there is no one style.
Exactly, that's why I was so blown away. So sick having these 2 guys making videos for this site.
fwiw, I think the person refusing action should give up the table
fwiw, I think the person refusing action should give up the table
Had i not been recording the table I would have gotten up, I agree.
I can't upload the m4v file on my iPod. It is telling me that the file cannot be played there. If you compare header of the file with another iPod videos even in text viewer, you can see a difference.
Same for me after testing, I'll talk to Entity about this, he'll know better than me.
Thanks for letting us know,
DeathDonkey
I can't upload the m4v file on my iPod. It is telling me that the file cannot be played there. If you compare header of the file with another iPod videos even in text viewer, you can see a difference.
I reproduced it and have a new version up right now. Can you check this one out and let me know if you have problems with it too? It plays on my work computer and my Mac so I think we're good to go now.
Rob
It is working now. Thank you, guys!
(Cross posted from lime slicer ep 6):
I thought both this and Krantz's half were very solid videos. I have a couple questions:
About 6m in Emil advocates checking behind the turn on a K7xJ board reasoning that we're probably only extracting 2 streets from this player. Would this change against a more aggressive, thinking player who is anticipating us to second barrel the J? I guess I'm asking if this is a good spot for a range merge against someone who expects us to be firing obvious bluff cards and which types of opponents we would be doing this against.
Also, around 40m in Emil mentions that he would expect players at higher stakes to show up with hands the first time they play back at aggresssion, but players at lower stakes may make the possibly more obvious decision to instead turn up their own aggression. This is a spot I find myself struggling with often- anticipating adjustments. Is there anything specific to look for when trying to decide whether a player is the type to sit back and wait for a hand or t oturn up their own aggression in response to ours? I find myself guessing a lot of the time (and often incorrectly).
Hopefully this is articulted well enough, thanks for any and all input
There's no correct answer. This is one of the biggest skills in becoming good at NLHE. Playing lots of hands, processing exactly what happens in each hand, determining frequencies for the future based on the type of player you played against, etc. etc.
Your thought process seems in the right place.
