43 Posts
Member since 08-14-2008
More posts by phenom
Intuation based players are better at adjusting than theory based. Let's say villain on the BTN opens alot but plays really weak vs 3bets. There is no theory that says you should be 3betting 98o...
Ever flat the 4bet ? Because when we get called we are always againts AK/JJ+. By flatting we keep his A6o/K8o/T8o in or whatever he 4bet bluffs with. Or is the dead money we pick up so often so ...
phenom it rarely is great to 4b/fold 99. if you can't call, you could fold. it seems like the clear play here is to figure out if you have a lot of profitable 4b bluffs (JJ+/AKo is...
depends on the player. against some i would 4-bet/call AQ, TT and 99. against some I might 4b/fold AQ and KQ. against some i would call AQ or KQ suited, or 99-TT. i've always thought...
Not that owned. Why should we feel that owned?
Cause we would have done the donkey move of calling with a draw twice without odds and missing. Then fee...
One of the reasons that you called pre was that you would fold too much in this spot if you folded KQ. But can we counter that by 4betting more raher than calling ? Especially OOP. Maybe better ...
What is the logic behind in min raising in HIJ ? My standard is pot from UTG/HIJ. 3x from CO. 2x from BTN.
If we CR the flop and the turn is a 9 of diamonds is the turn bet-fold ?
How owned should we feel if we bet the river and he snap calls with Qx ?
yah, 4-bet/fold. it's too good to fold to the 3-bet but too weak to call. I don't think calling and "playing poker" is a very good idea against a competent player on the button.