91 Posts
Member since 04-03-2007
More posts by kpr16
Well if I some how had unpaired high cards, I probably would have bet them as a bluff, and/or not made it to the river ![]()
So yes, kr b...
Yeah definitely too thin for value, with most 6-max ranges and this sequences imo. And I'd rather bluff QJ, J9, 97s? After checking, I do think 55 is a hand that you could consider a bluff kr ...
Personally, I'd fold the flop, even vs TLW. I'm just not seeing enough residual value, and the turn is going to be mashed by hands worse than the K, 100 percent I think. Meaning, it's unlikely...
I think this has to be a bet absent some read that villain slow-plays a lot OOP. It's CO/BTN, so there should be some light peeling with overs to 2nd pair, and 9x is somewhat vulnerable to over...
Welcome. Know I've seen the name around. Enjoyed reading your story.
-kpr
Maybe betting weaker kicker K's is fine. As for calling, depends on how many hands we have checked turn, so I haven't really made up my mind. Can rarely be that bad to call total bricks or boa...
Tough mental exercise when I let go of all the bias I have about how hands should play, so consider this a stream of consciousness.
It seems to me that there's decent amount of value ...
Not what I said. It does matter, but that doesn't make the excercise pointless.
Exactly. Just because a complete answer is not entirely knowable in so...
Folding according to alpha only would be wrong as villain has several streets to bluff/value bet, so yes, BB has to fold more than alpha (directly) suggests. I was wondering if you'v...
Hmm... not sure how to look at this. From BB's point of view, what would make calling down by alpha (i.e. taking a GTO approach to bluff catching I assume?) a bad idea? Could you gi...