11 Posts
Member since 08-14-2012
More posts by fetsidaj1
Well, I think it's not possible to 3bet this hand preflop for value simply because if you are 3betting for value, you are 3betting against his calling range(not opening range).
I gue...
If you think he is capable of stacking off with FDs, worse TPs, then I like 3betting the flop.
As a default, I prefer calling the flop, though.
Betting looks pretty good, it is clearly for value, this guy can call with many TPs(even though some of them have decent pot equity against QQ), draws, overs etc.
If he shoves, ...
If he keeps 4betting you, then 3betting and in turn 5betting with higher frequency seems reasonable to me.
You ought to avoid 3betting hands that have good postflop equity and simult...
I thought it was 100bbs deep..
200BB I am not really sure what to do.
If villain squeezes a lot, I think 4bet preflop makes a lot of sense.
Vast majority of regs have depolarized squeezing range and 99 is not really good hand against that range even th...
I think i'd fold vs a 34/6, unless we've seen him do this with TP before. Our range looks strong and I cant see this guy shoving AJ for value/
Well, bu...
I don't really like jamming the flop.
I expect his c/r range to be very strong = you don't have a lot of fold equity + you are deep, IP and with decent draw and therefore calling the...
I prefer to check behind the flop simply because it's not possible to c-bet this flop for value against 18/13 reg calling from the bb.
His calling range on the flop will probably con...