24 Posts
Member since 04-18-2008
More posts by stackedu
the rake is the same, but the rakeback is different. Im pretty sure unless ur at least supernova FTP is much better in terms of rakeback. Even at supernova playing HU i think FTP is still bett...
personally id usally just call the flop and see how he plays the turn. If he checks the turn id prabably shove, and if he fires the turn id fold.
i dont know about 50nl but 100 and 200 NL are about the same on both sites.
At 100 Id play on FTP because of the rakeback since the stars FPP program sucks for HU.
I dont like calling 3-bets with small pairs only 100bb deep and i would check the turn.
I left UB because everytime i opened more then 3 tables it would freeze.
I haven't played on UB in a few months but cashouts were always fast for me using Epassport, Moneygram, and checks. There are alot more HU games on FTP then UB I know that for sure.
I think its because no regulars play 50nl HU because the rake is so high. 100nl you get a ton of regulars playing HU so they each sit at 2-4 tables
I have HEM version 1.06.03h and I cannot find the 2nd barrel or fold to 2nd barrel stat.
On my other computer which has a much older version of HEM on it I have those stats. Are t...