21 Posts
Member since 08-19-2010
More posts by janlul79
It's my first orbit, villain is unknown.
Yes, our implied odds are better versus a nit because he has a tight opening range. It gets even better when you know he will go too far with his premium hands, and is likely to stack off. You s...
Full Tilt Poker $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em - 8 players -
over 1 year ago
Position Question
I guess I did too since there was no flop.
Anyway even against a tight short stack I think we can still at least set mine getting ~6:1 immediate and like 13:1 implied. ...
I'm definitely continuing here. A paired board is unlikely to hit him. I see him holding a lot of smaller pairs, and it looks like a weak attempt to make you fold overcards. I'm betting the turn...
Bottomset,
you say you check the QQ hand "because he has a high aggression factor, he folds to a lot of flop bets".
How does folding raise his AF? I thought it was not taken into acc...
I see. Another problem is that you are facing two unknowns. I think it's a bit dangerous to try a more sophisticated line without accurate info on their postflop tendencies.
The line you want to take came up in a DC video I watched last night.
The plan is to check for deception so we can get two streets of value from a worse hand right? It worked well in the v...
Because you 3bet pre, a 13/10 will have a hard time to continue unless he has AK,AQ,AJ I think. If you check to induce a bet, you don't know if he does it for value with his made hands, or becau...
I guess it's just a different approach. I prefer picking it up right there on the flop.
What do you mean with betting for balance? You would normally check your good hands there?
Why is there no value in betting? I think you have to bet here, you have the initiative and you can easily represent hitting the ace. They both look like bad setminers, holding something like 77...