---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by WiltOnTilt (Mid Stakes)

Awesome video, my questions pretty much revolved around the 3betting style, thanks heaps for putting so much effort into answering everyones questions, loved the video, loved your explanations, keep it up, lets see more

cheers

Great video...can't wait to see some more. I like the in-game commentary to see exactly what your thinking and why.

WoT, re:

"adjusting for him" that I try to tell my students not to do

perhaps you could expand on this a little? Is just basically another way of phrasing “keep doing x until your opponent gives you a reason not too”?

If so, do you think there is any tension between this idea and the idea that we should be trying to stay one step ahead of our opponent, by anticipating when we think our opponent is going to adjust and adjusting our play to make our opponent's adjustment incorrect”? (i.e. before he has given us a reason not to)

WoT, re:

perhaps you could expand on this a little? Is just basically another way of phrasing “keep doing x until your opponent gives you a reason not too”?

If so, do you think there is any tension between this idea and the idea that we should be trying to stay one step ahead of our opponent, by anticipating when we think our opponent is going to adjust and adjusting our play to make our opponent's adjustment incorrect”? (i.e. before he has given us a reason not to)

yes it's just another way of saying “keep doing x until your opponent gives you a reason not too”.

I hear what you're saying about always trying to be one step ahead, it's hard to reconcile the two ideas... there are some spots where you must try to do that (like the 5bet all in with KQ when i thought he was 4betting me light) and other spots where you simply shouldn't -- like "i've been cbetting him 90% and he's been folding... i better not cbet this time because he might play back!"

it's sort of hard to quantify... but i guess the best way i can describe it is if you're getting away with exploiting him in a certain way, keep exploiting until they show you that they can play back... once they do "play back" then decide if they are doing it out of frustration or if they were just trying to wait for a hand.

make sense?

Aaron

well done, padawan

WoT,
I have no idea who that guy was, have no connection to stox poker, and was not getting coached during the video
-rum

make sense?

Yes, ty.

And more HU vids plz!

Great vid. I love your analysis, and really appreciate the real time thought process tbh. It would be pretty sweet to have your real time commentary, but have you go back and record additional comments / pauses / elaboration post production. That way we get not only the time constraints and real / accurate thoughts - but also get to hear you after the fact (obv) correcting spots that perhaps you discussed or didn't fully cover.

I think you were giving your first op too much credit.. he just fast played aces twice, i don't think he'd think you think he was bluffing or anything like that, just raised and hoped for a call

More Wilt On Tilt HU please!

Time Link to 00:46:11

With the AA, wouldn't an overriding factor be that he flat-called the 4-bet OOP with T7s the hand before? If you consider that your read on his 3-bet range is polarized to monsters and suited connector type hands based on his earlier flats with AJ and TT and he has shown a willingness to call his suited connectors OOP, then I think that not 4-betting AA is a big mistake.

His range might even lean a little more toward the monsters which you would be ecstatic to play for stacks for since he just showed a mediocre hand OOP. Also since you showed Q3 as a 4-bet, he would be hard-pressed to not go with the bottom of his "monsters" range such as AQ and JJ

Time Link to 00:46:36

Ugh! To follow-up my prior thread, I just saw that he had AK. I am just starting with HUNL and have no doubt that you could crush me Wilt, but I am very good at the psychology in these spots and I am certain that this is a spot for a 4-bet.