NoWayFolding
3807 posts
Joined 03/2008
River bet size is awful. Gets him to induce lots of stuff like 65, 4x, doesnt get value from Qx and 2nd pocket pairs.
He doesnt have a 3 in his range so he is repping FH here. Id call and expect to see pocket pair turned into bluff often enough. He is basically repping <12combos.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Allermand_DK
794 posts
Joined 11/2008
Vil's raise river %, WWSF %, Agfq river would be something, to take into account whether to fold or call imo.
You're getting about 2:1 on a call OTR, so the question to ask youself: Is Villian having 2/3 value combos and 1/3 bluffs vs. you hand? In other words are you beating 33% or more of Vil's range OTR --> call
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
terp
1996 posts
Joined 01/2008
I think that is really terrible so I expect most regs to think so.
stomping out projection is one of the biggest hurdles uNL players have to clear, imo, before they start really crushing and moving up
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Allermand_DK
794 posts
Joined 11/2008
Vil's raise river %, WWSF %, Agfq river would be something, to take into account whether to fold or call imo.
You're getting about 2:1 on a call OTR, so the question to ask youself: Is Villian having 2/3 value combos and 1/3 bluffs vs. you hand? In other words are you beating 33% or more of Vil's range OTR --> call
This is how I understand balance, is this the proper way to wiev balance terp? Maybe a bit off topic sorry..
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
terp
1996 posts
Joined 01/2008
Allermand_DK
794 posts
Joined 11/2008
that's just pot odds, sir 
Okay sir
guess what I was asking: Can I use this question by reframe it as: Is this distribution 33% bluff and 67% value likely to be accurate for this Vil's range? (100% balanced) In other words use this method to estimated how balanced this Vil is?
Thanks..
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Adriano85
898 posts
Joined 02/2012
Okay sir
guess what I was asking: Can I use this question by reframe it as: Is this distribution 33% bluff and 67% value likely to be accurate for this Vil's range? (100% balanced) In other words use this method to estimated how balanced this Vil is?
Thanks..
Good question. Although I think it's impossible to have 66% value and 33% bluff in your range in every single hand you play. I think you should use this distribution over a total of a large sample and not in every single hand because it's just impossible. Is that correct??
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Allermand_DK
794 posts
Joined 11/2008
Adriano85
898 posts
Joined 02/2012
I was referring to Villians range ;-)
, IMO it's all we need to know in order to call profitable, but when we raise or bet we have to think about balance I in our range..
I know, I was talking about villains range. It doesnt matter if its our range or villains. It's just not possible to have this distribution on every board.
Posted 11 months ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
djdoodoo
65 posts
Joined 05/2010